> > I switched mhttpd to use the new javascript based run start and stop pages.
> 
> One initial complaint: the transition.html page doesn't seem to deal well with a frontend program using
> a deferred transition.
>

We now have a test frontend for deferred transitions, and this problem will likely be fixed.

> 
> I separately still think that the transition page should automatically go away after 5 seconds
>

This is a user-interface philosophy issue.

Instead of using personal preferences one should follow established design principles
(there is research done and books written about this).

I did not recently look at current recommendations for this type of interaction, but generally
one expects web pages to "do things" (such as switch to a different page) only when directed
by user input (press a button).

My personal opinion is that half the users will find 5 sec delay too slow, the other half will
find 5 sec too fast and the 3rd half will wonder "what happened, the web page flashed and disappeared,
did I miss something important, how do I get back to whatever is was?!?".

One idea is to implement the transition page as a implant on the state page - after the "start" page
you go back to the status page where you can see the progress of the transition. After the transition
completes, it's progress window "collapses" into a "success/failure" display with a link to the full
transition page to see any details of what happened. Any volunteers? (I would html-ize the status page first).

K.O.