Suddenly the mhttpd odb inline editor is truncating the odb string entries to the actual length of the
stored string value, this causes db_get_record() explode with "structure mismatch" errors. (Not my
fault, You Honor! Honest!). For example, I see these errors from al_check() after changing
"/programs/foo/start command" - suddenly it cannot get the program_info record.
What a mess.
Actually, this is not a new mess, midas was always been rather brittle with db_get_record()
and db_open_record(), always unhappy if something goes wrong in odb, like a lost
entry in equipment statistics or an extra variable in equipment common, etc.
To patch it all up, I added a function db_get_record1() which knows the structure of the data
and can call db_check_record() to fix the odb structure and make db_get_record() happy.
Many places in midas now use it, making odb structure mismatches "self healing" in a way.
But when looking at uses of db_get_record(), I notices that in many places it can be trivially
replaced by one or two db_get_value(). I did change this in a couple of places in mhttpd.
This way of coding is more robust against unexpected contents in odb and is easier
to maintain going forward, when new odb entries must be added for new functionality.
Most uses of db_get_record() are now converted to db_get_record1(), except where it is
used in together with of db_open_record(). (which uses db_get_record() internally).
To fix the db_open_record() uses, I considered adding db_open_record1() which would
also know the data structure and automatically repair any mismatch, but I think instead of that,
I will switch them to use db_watch() (in conjunction with manual db_get_record()/get_record1()
and plain db_get_value()).
When adding automatic repair mechanism like this, one should beware of "update wars",
where two midas programs built against slightly different versions of midas would
each try to change odb in it's way, in an endless loop. (yes, it did happen, more than once).
One solution to this is to assign an "owner" to each data structure, the "consumers"
of the data have to deal with anything missing or unexpected. If they use db_get_value()
it should all be happy. (if the owner has to be reassigned, back to the wars again, until
everything is rebuilt against the same version of midas).
P.S. In languages lacking reflection, like C and C++, it is impossible to trivially implement
a mapping from a data structure to an external entity, such as db_get_record() to map C struct
into ODB. Many attempts have been made, i.e. ROOT CINT, all of them brittle, hard
to maintain, generally unsatisfactory. Java was the first mainstream language
to have reflection. Modern languages, such as Go, have reflection from day 1. Of course
all scripting languages, perl, python, javascript, always had reflection. The C++ language
standard will get reflections some day. Today one can easily do reflection in C++ using the Clang
compiler, the main reason for ROOT v6 switching from CINT to Clang.
K.O. |