> > > > Hi all,
> > > > for my experiment we ended up with the need of changing lot of parameters (~9000 values) in the ODB at once by the sequencer.
> > > > The very first solution was to use a sequencer function with a ton of ODBSET calls, however a more elegant solution may be to provide an "ODBLoad" command which mimics the "load" command of odbedit.
> > > > I already have a working modification to the sequencer for this, if you agree I will commit it to a dedicated brach.
> > > > Let me know if you think this is a good approach.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sounds like a good idea. I trust you are using the data in json format? Perhaps the command
> > > should be named "ODBLoadJSON" to be clear about this.
> > > 
> > > (JSON is preferred over .odb and .xml for many reasons (ask me))
> > 
> > What if some experiment keep some files in .xml format (ask me!). The routine should check for the extension and support all three formats.
> > 
> 
> Yes, hard to tell without seeing his full proposal, including the code. If it is load from file,
> sure we look at the file extension, I think the existing code already would do this and support all 3 formats.
> 
> But if he wants to load ODB data from a text literal or from a string,
> we might as well stick to json. I guess we could support the other formats, but I do not see anybody
> using anything other than json for new code like this.
> 
> ODBPasteJSON("/foo/bar/baz", '{"var1":1, "var2":"somestr"}');

I agree that if one would paste a string to the ODB, then JSON would be best.

But at MEG, we keep hundreds of XML files for configuration. Mostly historical, but that's how it is.

Stefan