> for (int i=0; i<array_of_10_elements.size(); i++)

becomes

for (size_t i=0; i<array.size(); i++)

but for a reverse loop, replacing "int" with "size_t" becomes a bug:

for (size_t i=array.size()-1; i>=0; i--)

explodes, last iteration should be with i set to 0, then i--
wraps it around a very big positive value and loop end condition
is still true (i>=0), the loop never ends. (why is there no GCC warning
that with "size_t i", "i>=0" is always true?

a kludge solution is:

for (size_t i=array.size()-1; ; i--) {
do_stuff(i, array[i]);
if (i==0) break;
}

if you do not need the index variable, you can use a reverse iterator (which is missing from a few 
container classes).

K.O.