> Hi,
>     I found that midas banks can be given an extra 32 bits of zeros when
> trying to keep to 32bit boundary on my x86_64. 
> 
> This can be fixed by changing (in midas.h)
> #define ALIGN8(x)  (((x)+7) & ~7)
> to
> #define ALIGN8(x)  (((x)+3) & ~3)
> 
> Is there any bad consequences doing this?

Yes. ALIGN8 means 'align to 8-byte boundary' (64-bit), and if you change that, you
break the code at various locations. Furthermore, 8-byte aligned access is faster
on x86_64 than 4-byte aligned access, so you will get a performance penalty. If
course if you have very many small banks, the zero padding can cause some
overhead, but in that case you could combine some data into a single bank.