> > BTW, how do I resize the ODB.

ODB cannot be resized "online". Everything has to stop, save content to odb.json, get rid of old ODB.SHM, ensure ODB shared memory is destroyed (SysV or POSIX shared memory), 
create new ODB with new size, load odb.json. Feel free to punch this into chatgpt > odbresize.cxx, commit, test, push.

> I remember we discussed this some time ago, and concluded that odbedit needs a resize flag.

ODB cannot be resized online. ODB API has ODB clients holding ODB handles which are pointers (offsets) into ODB shared memory.

> Has this even been done?
> I guess this is still not done and the issue is still open: https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/329/need-odbresize
> I guess if we touch this maybe the problem with the wrong size should be also fixed: https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/328/odbinit-s-1024mb-creates-odb-with-wrong

please contribute 14 distraction-free days to my patreon. thanks in advance!

K.O.

> small problem. build an experiment, start taking data, observe how ODB is never saved to disk because the "last client" never stops. as bonus, crash 
> the computer, observe how all changes to ODB are now lost. if mlogger is configured to save odb.json at the end of run, and to write ODB dumps at 
> begin and end of every data file, you can recover some of the lost 

The new behavior is not much worse than before. Assume 10 programs running happily for days, computer crashes, all ODB changes lost. 
So indeed a periodic flush without holding the lock might be best. Use a semaphore to prevent all programs flushing at the same time, or put
the flush only in the logger after an end of run.

Stefan

> 
> > small problem. build an experiment, start taking data, observe how ODB is never saved to disk because the "last client" never stops. as bonus, crash 
> > the computer, observe how all changes to ODB are now lost. if mlogger is configured to save odb.json at the end of run, and to write ODB dumps at 
> > begin and end of every data file, you can recover some of the lost 
> 
> The new behavior is not much worse than before. Assume 10 programs running happily for days, computer crashes, all ODB changes lost. 
> So indeed a periodic flush without holding the lock might be best. Use a semaphore to prevent all programs flushing at the same time, or put
> the flush only in the logger after an end of run.

are you sure? when/how often does "last midas program finishes" happen? it does not happen on a system crash, not on power loss, not on "shutdown -r now" 
(I am pretty sure). In the experiments you run, how often do you shut down all programs (and check that you did not forget one somehow)?

sanity check. dragon experiment, very active, .ODB.SHM timestamp is 1 second old. not-very-active agmini, today is June 13th, timestamp of .ODB.SHM is June 
2nd. inactive TACTIC, timestamp of .ODB.SHM is May 16th.

so yes, not great, but in the new scheme, ODB.SHM timestamps would probably be from 2021 or 2020.

my vote is to undo this change, it is dangerous because it causes odb to be saved to ODB.SHM never.

K.O.

> are you sure? when/how often does "last midas program finishes" happen? it does not happen on a system crash, not on power loss, not on "shutdown -r now" 
> (I am pretty sure). In the experiments you run, how often do you shut down all programs (and check that you did not forget one somehow)?

Indeed this is almost never the case, maybe once per months. On the other hand, we have a complete crash of the os maybe once a year. Most of the time the programs 
run continuously (we do not need odbedit), so our timestamp is typically one or two days old, so not good either.

> my vote is to undo this change, it is dangerous because it causes odb to be saved to ODB.SHM never.

My vote is to flush the odb either periodically or after each run.

Stefan 

> 
> > are you sure? when/how often does "last midas program finishes" happen? it does not happen on a system crash, not on power loss, not on "shutdown -r now" 
> > (I am pretty sure). In the experiments you run, how often do you shut down all programs (and check that you did not forget one somehow)?
> 
> Indeed this is almost never the case, maybe once per months. On the other hand, we have a complete crash of the os maybe once a year. Most of the time the programs 
> run continuously (we do not need odbedit), so our timestamp is typically one or two days old, so not good either.
> 
> > my vote is to undo this change, it is dangerous because it causes odb to be saved to ODB.SHM never.
> 
> My vote is to flush the odb either periodically or after each run.
> 

So we are in agreement.

RFE filed:
https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/367/odb-should-be-saved-to-disk-periodically

Dangerous change reverted:
60e4c44ad66346b89ba057391acf7a02890049be

K.O.

bash-3.2$ git diff
diff --git a/src/odb.cxx b/src/odb.cxx
index 0d3b88c2..d104ff28 100644
--- a/src/odb.cxx
+++ b/src/odb.cxx
@@ -2199,7 +2199,14 @@ INT db_close_database(HNDLE hDB)
       destroy_flag = (pheader->num_clients == 0);
 
       /* flush shared memory to disk */
-      if (destroy_flag)
+
+      /* if we save ODB to disk only after last client finishes, we will never save ODB to disk
+         in most experiments - none of them ever completely stop MIDAS in normal operation.
+         as result, all changes to ODB contents will be lost on system crash, power loss
+         or normal reboot. see https://daq00.triumf.ca/elog-midas/Midas/2539
+         K.O. June 2023. */
+
+      if (1 || destroy_flag)
          ss_shm_flush(pheader->name, pdb->shm_adr, pdb->shm_size, pdb->shm_handle);
 
       strlcpy(xname, pheader->name, sizeof(xname));

K.O.

> RFE filed:
> https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/367/odb-should-be-saved-to-disk-periodically

Implemented and closed: https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/367/odb-should-be-saved-to-disk-periodically

Stefan

> > RFE filed:
> > https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/367/odb-should-be-saved-to-disk-periodically
> 
> Implemented and closed: https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/367/odb-should-be-saved-to-disk-periodically
> 
> Stefan

Stefan's comments from the closed bug report:

Ok I implemented some periodic flushing. Here is what I did:

Created

/System/Flush/Flush period : TID_UINT32 /System/Flush/Last flush : TID_UINT32

which control the flushing to disk. The default value for “Flush period” is 60 seconds or one minute.

All clients call db_flush_database() through their cm_yield() function
db_flush_database() checks the “Last flush” and only flushes the ODB when the period has expired. This test is 
done inside the ODB semaphore so that we don’t get a race condigiton
If the period has expired, db_flush_database() calls ss_shm_flush()
ss_shm_flush() tries to allocate a buffer of the shared memory. If the allocation is not successful (out of 
memory), ss_shm_flush() writes directly to the binary file as before.
If the allocation is successful, ss_shm_flush() copies the share memory to a buffer and passes this buffer to a 
dedicated thread which writes the buffer to the binary file. This causes ss_shm_flush() to return immediately and 
not block the calling program during the disk write operation.
Added back the “if (destroy_flag) ss_shm_flush()” so that the ODB is flushed for sure before the shared memory 
gets deleted.
This means now that under normal circumstances, exiting programs like odbedit do NOT flush the ODB. This allows to 
call many “odbedit -c” in a row without the flush penalty. Nevertheless, the ODB then gets flushed by other 
clients latest 60 seconds (or whatever the flush period is) after odbedit exits.

Please note that ODB flushing has two purposes:

When all programs exit, we need a persistent storage for the ODB. In most experiments this only happens very 
seldom. Maybe at the end of a beam time period.
If the computer crashes, a recent version of the ODB is kept on disk to simplify recovery after the crash.
Since crashes are not so often (during production periods we have maybe one hardware failure every few years) the 
flushing of the ODB too often does not make sense and just consumes resources. Flushing does also not help from 
corrupted ODBs, since the binary image will also get corrupted. So the only reason for periodic flushes is to ease 
recovery after a total crash. I put the default to 60 seconds, but if people are really paranoid they can decrease 
it to 10 seconds or so. Or increase it to 600 seconds if their system does not crash every week and disks are 
slow.

I made a dedicated branch feature/periodic_odb_flush so people can test the new functionality. If there are no 
complaints within the next few days, I will merge that into develop.

Stefan

Recently I was trying to read sequencer scripts written by a previous student, and realized it would be easier to 
quickly read/skim sequencer code with some form of syntax highlighting. I've been using Visual Studio Code as my 
editor, so I made myself an extension for VS Code that provides basic syntax highlighting (with help from 
ChatGPT-3.5). It's good enough for my purposes, but is missing some features you'd expect for full language 
support. This got me wondering - does anything like this already exist, perhaps with more complete support?

If it doesn't already exist, and if there is interest, I could to publish mine 
to vscode's "Extension Marketplace" for easy installations (I'd also welcome contributions for 
more features). For now, I've installed it on my computer directly from the .vsix file, which I've put on my own 
github at https://github.com/maia-hw/midas-sequencer-support . There is also a readme with screenshot showing what scripts 
will look like with the highlighting

I like the idea of syntax highlighting, but your solution is just for one editor which not everybody
is using. It would be better if the editor built into mhttpd for MSL files would have the possibility.

I looked at highlighting in an HTML <textarea> tag, and found that we can do it with a 

<div contenteditable="true" style="font-family: monospace"> ... </div>

tag where we can change the color of individual words. If you translate your existing rules of syntax
highlighting into JavaScript, I'm happy to put that into the mhttpd sequencer editor. So I would need
a function which receives a MSL text, then replaces all keywords with some color tagging, like

ODBSET -> <span style="color:red">ODBSET</span>

Best,
Stefan

Another small user experience request:

When making a link in the odb (web interface) a nice browser window pop's up. There is however not scrolling possible in the window. As a result, you can not reach a odb key if it is nested to deeply. 

Trying to type out the Link target in the field only allows for 32 characters

context: we are setting up a bunch of Links in the History

> When making a link in the odb (web interface) a nice browser window pop's up. There is however not scrolling possible in the window. As a result, you can not reach a odb key if it is nested to deeply. 
> 
> Trying to type out the Link target in the field only allows for 32 characters

Thanks for reporting the bug with the pop-up not being able to scroll, I fixed that and committed the change.

I do however not understand the issue with 32 characters. The link NAME should not be more than 32 chars (which applies to all ODB keys). 
But if I try I can write more than 32 chars in the link target.

Stefan