ELOG Midas

Back Midas Rome Roody Rootana

Midas DAQ System, Page 120 of 136

Not logged in

Find | Login | Help

Full | Summary | Threaded | Show attachments

2711 Entries

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 119, 120, 121 ... 134, 135, 136 Next

Front end electronics broadcast data over ethernet, can midas read this in

Hi,
   the system I'm building will have data read into the frontend nodes
via ethernet (optic). Is this possible?>

I upgraded from 1.9.5 to the latest on SVN an it works fine

I tried again and could not reproduce the problem. Last time I was probably confused by some old mserver.exe executable I had lying around. I updated to the most recent version (3516) and did a C:\midas> nmake -f makefile.nt. Last time I was also confused about the low rate, but that was caused by a mserver.exe executable which was not compiled with optimization. For small event sizes (such as 10 bytes) there is a big difference between optimized and non-optimized code. So I got:

First Console wrote:

ID of event to produce: 1
Host to connect: localhost
Event size: 10
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.46 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.42 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.42 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.44 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.42 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.44 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.44 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.40 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.42 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.44 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.43 MB/sec
flush

and

Second Console wrote:

C:\midas\NT\bin>.\consume
ID of event to request: 1
Host to connect:
Get all events (0/1): 1
Receive via callback ([y]/n):
[consume.c:73:process_event] Serial number mismatch: Ser: 1169666, OldSer: 0, ID
: 1, size: 10
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.42 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.42 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   2.4 %, Rate: 0.35 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.50 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.41 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.40 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Received break. Aborting...

Actually sending remote and receiving local is a very common thing. Most experiments use that. They have a remote frontend, and the logger and analyzer work locally. If that would not work, all these experiments would have a problem. So I only can encourage you to try again, make sure to update and recompile the executables. Maybe delete any old *.SHM file. Maybe try on another PC or under Linux.

Denis Bilenko wrote:

1 & 3 - thanks for the fix and the explanation, as for 2 - I've tried consume and produce
and still has a problem

Acknowledged. I could reproduce it with the information you supplied, thank you very much. Also the data rate is slower than what I expect. I will investigate and fix this, but it could take some time.

1 & 3 - thanks for the fix and the explanation, as for 2 - I've tried consume and produce
and still has a problem:

Config: GET_ALL, event id = 1, event size = 10, Receive via callback,
OS = Windows XP SP2
I restart mserver manually from command-line every time (not using system service).
I start produce first, then I start consume.
In two cases of four starting 'consume' causes 'produce' to exit immediatelly.
Guess which two Smile

both local or both remote - works (i.e. non-zero rates in both consoles)
produce local, consume via rpc and vice versa - 'produce' exits with error

1. produce via rpc, consume locally

first console:

D:\denis\cmd\midas\current\06jan21-export\midas\NT\bin>produce.exe
ID of event to produce: 1
Host to connect: 127.0.0.1
Event size: 10
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.64 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.64 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.63 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.64 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.61 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.62 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.62 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.64 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.63 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.63 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.64 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.62 MB/sec

## Now I've started consume in the other console ##

[system.c:3570:send_tcp] send(socket=1900,size=8136) returned -1, errno: 0 (No error)
send_tcp() returned -1
[midas.c:9669:rpc_send_event] send_tcp() failed
rpc_send_event returned error 503, event_size 10

second console:

D:\denis\cmd\midas\current\06jan21-export\midas\NT\bin>consume.exe
ID of event to request: 1
Host to connect:
Get all events (0/1): 1
Receive via callback ([y]/n):
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 0
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 0
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 0
Received break. Aborting...

mserver's output:

D:\denis\cmd\midas\current\06jan21-export\midas\NT\bin\mserver.exe started interactively
[midas.c:2315:bm_validate_client_index] Invalid client index 0 in buffer 'SYSTEM'.
Client name 'Power Consumer', pid 1964 should be 3216

2. produce locally, consume via rpc

D:\denis\cmd\midas\current\06jan21-export\midas\NT\bin>produce.exe
ID of event to produce: 1
Host to connect:
Event size: 10
Client 'Producer' (PID 2584) on 'ODB' removed by cm_watchdog (idle 144.1s,TO 10s)
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.20 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.20 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.11 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.13 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.06 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.20 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 2.96 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.11 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.18 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.13 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.17 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.19 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.08 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 3.06 MB/sec

## Now I've started consume ##

[midas.c:2315:bm_validate_client_index] Invalid client index 0 in buffer 'SYSTEM'. Client name '', pid 0 should be 760

Second console:

D:\denis\cmd\midas\current\06jan21-export\midas\NT\bin>consume.exe
ID of event to request: 1
Host to connect: 127.0.0.1
Get all events (0/1): 1
Receive via callback ([y]/n):
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 0
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 0
Received break. Aborting...
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 0

mserver haven't said anything.

3. Both remote (just for comparison)

D:\denis\cmd\midas\current\06jan21-export\midas\NT\bin>produce.exe
ID of event to produce: 1
Host to connect: 127.0.0.1
Event size: 10
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.65 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.65 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.60 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.64 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.63 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.61 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.63 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.65 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.65 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.67 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.65 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.65 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.65 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
Level:  66.8 %, Rate: 0.66 MB/sec
flush
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec
Level:  66.8 %, Rate: 0.31 MB/sec
Level:  57.2 %, Rate: 0.15 MB/sec
Level:  57.3 %, Rate: 0.14 MB/sec
Level:  57.3 %, Rate: 0.15 MB/sec
Level:  57.3 %, Rate: 0.14 MB/sec
Level:  57.3 %, Rate: 0.14 MB/sec
Level:  57.3 %, Rate: 0.14 MB/sec
Received break. Aborting...
Received 2nd break. Hard abort.
[midas.c:1581:] cm_disconnect_experiment not called at end of program

Second console:

D:\denis\cmd\midas\current\06jan21-export\midas\NT\bin>consume.exe
ID of event to request: 1
Host to connect: 127.0.0.1
Get all events (0/1): 1
Receive via callback ([y]/n):
[consume.c:73:process_event] Serial number mismatch: Ser: 1397076, OldSer: 0, ID: 1, size: 10
Level:  37.1 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.15 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  95.4 %, Rate: 0.08 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  66.8 %, Rate: 0.14 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  66.8 %, Rate: 0.12 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  76.3 %, Rate: 0.12 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  95.4 %, Rate: 0.11 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  57.3 %, Rate: 0.15 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  66.8 %, Rate: 0.11 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  85.9 %, Rate: 0.11 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  95.5 %, Rate: 0.12 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:  57.4 %, Rate: 0.15 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   9.7 %, Rate: 0.15 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
[Producer] [midas.c:1581:] cm_disconnect_experiment not called at end of program
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.03 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Level:   0.0 %, Rate: 0.00 MB/sec, ser mismatches: 1
Received break. Aborting...

Denis Bilenko wrote:

1. Blocking calls to midas api aren't usable when client is connected through mserver. This is true at least for bm_receive_event, but seems to be a more general problem - midas application has call cm_yield within 10 seconds (or whatever timeout is set) to remain alive.
That not the case when RPC is not used.

The 10 seconds timeout you see comes from the RPC layer. If you call bm_receive_event and it blocks, then the client will consider a RPC timeout after 10 seconds. Has nothing to do with cm_yield(). Calling a blocking function via a sever connection is not a good idea anyhow, since this process then cannot respond on anything else, like run transitions. That's why I never used it and that's why I have not realized that behaviour. I did change it however such that bm_receive_event, if called without the ASYNC flag, disables the RPC timeout for this call and restores it afterwards. This is now in midas.c revision 3502. You can try this with midas/examples/lowlevel/produce and consume easily.

Denis Bilenko wrote:

2. On Windows, two processes on the same machine can send/receive events to each other only if they both use midas locally (through shared mem) or they both use midas via RPC (through mserver), but not if they use different ways.

I just tried again and it did work. I used produce/consume. If you enter just <return> for the host name, these programs connect locally. So I tried both producer locally, consumer remote, and vice versa, and both worked. I did however use consume with the callback functionality. I did not try your Python programs however. If you find out that produce/consume does work and your Python program don't, then adapt your Python programs to resemble produce/consume.

Denis Bilenko wrote:

3. Receiving/sending same events from the same process - was possible in 1.9.5-1, not so in the current version (revision 3501, mxml revision 45). Is this an intended behavior fix?

Yes. It was introduced in revision 3186 on July 28th, 2006. It fixed a problem that the buffer level was always shown as 100% full, even if there were no other clients registered. By ignoring the own process, the buffer level now correctly shows the "contents" of a buffer from 0..100%. It also gave a small speed improvement. If you want to send events to the own process, you have to do it from the calling level. Like if you call bm_send_event(), you call manually process_event or however your event receiving routine is called. This is also much faster than going through the buffer.

>    has anyone managed to get midas to work on a x86_64 processor. I followed the
> instructions for the 64-bit opteron but i am getting runtime error when trying
> the examples.


We run 64-bit MIDAS on RHEL4 with 64-bit ROOT and everything generally works,
except for compatibility problems with 32-bit MIDAS.

Everything should work if you ensure that on your 64-bit machine everything is
compiled 64-bit (including the mserver - we always forget to install the correct version
to /usr/local/bin). 32-bit MIDAS programs running on other machine
can talk to 64-bit MIDAS via the mserver.

The big problem is that 64-bit and 32-bit ODB turned out to be incompatible - several data
fields have different sizes - and we did not decide yet how to fix this. Any fix will involve
breaking the binary ODB for one of the two platforms (we could break both, just to be fair, heh!)

>  When running example/basic/odb_test I getting errors like
> [odb.c:6818:db_get_record] struct size mismatch for "/Alarms/Alarms/Demo ODB" (464 instead of 452)

Yes, data size mismatch errors indicates that you mixed 32-bit and 64-bit MIDAS. Recompile everyting
as 64-bit, remove all the dot-ODB files, remove all the shared memory segments (ipcrm),
then everything should work.

K.O.

Hi,
   has anyone managed to get midas to work on a x86_64 processor. I followed the
instructions for the 64-bit opteron but i am getting runtime error when trying
the examples.

 When running example/basic/odb_test I getting errors like

[odb.c:6818:db_get_record] struct size mismatch for "/Alarms/Alarms/Demo ODB"
(464 instead of 452)
[odb.c:6818:db_get_record] struct size mismatch for "/Alarms/Alarms/Demo ODB"
(464 instead of 452)
[midas.c:16576:al_check] Cannot get alarm record

Any ideas what is wrong?

Hello,

We've been using midas and have stumbled upon some inconsistent behaviour:
1. Blocking calls to midas api aren't usable when client is connected through
mserver. This is true at least for bm_receive_event, but seems to be a more
general problem - midas application has call cm_yield within 10 seconds (or
whatever timeout is set) to remain alive.
That not the case when RPC is not used.

2. On Windows, two processes on the same machine can send/receive events to
each other only if they both use midas locally (through shared mem) or they
both use midas via RPC (through mserver), but not if they use different ways.

3. Receiving/sending same events from the same process - was possible in
1.9.5-1, not so in the current version (revision 3501, mxml revision 45). Is this an intended behavior fix?
To explain how to reproduce bugs, I will use 2 helper programs evprint.py and
evsend.py - for receiving and sending events respectively. You don't need
them, just something to send and receive events. (These are part of pymidas, which will be
released to public any time soon, but is quite usable already).

They both accept
* --path option in "host/experiment" format (for cm_connect_experiment call)
* --log option which command them to trace all midas' calls to terminal

evprint.py have two ways of receiving events
1) via looping over bm_receive_event
2) via providing callback to bm_request_event and looping over cm_yield(400) call

Example of use:

first-console$ python evprint.py receive
second-console$ python evsend.py 123
[first console]
id=2007 mask=2007 serial=2007 time=1169372833 len=3 '123'

So,

1. Blocking calls to midas api aren't usable when client is connected through
mserver.

$ python evprint.py --log --path 127.0.0.1/online receive"
cm_connect_experiment('127.0.0.1', 'online', 'evprint.py', None)
bm_open_buffer('SYSTEM', 1048576, &c_long(2)) -> BM_CREATED
bm_request_event(2, -1, -1, 2, &c_long(0), None)
... wait for a couple of seconds ...
[midas.c:9348:rpc_call] rpc timeout, routine = "bm_receive_event"
[system.c:3570:send_tcp] send(socket=0,size=8) returned -1, errno: 88 (Socket 
operation on non-socket)
[midas.c:9326:rpc_call] send_tcp() failed

bm_receive_event(2, ...) -> RPC_TIMEOUT

bm_remove_event_request(2, 0) -> BM_INVALID_HANDLE
bm_close_buffer(2) -> BM_INVALID_HANDLE
cm_disconnect_experiment()

2. Missing events on windows
a) Both use midas locally - works

   1: python evprint.py receive
   2: python evsend.py 123
   1: id=2007 mask=2007 serial=2007 time=1169372833 len=3 '123'

b) Both use midas via RPC - works

   1: python evprint.py --path 127.0.0.1/ dispatch
   2: python evsend.py --path 127.0.0.1/ 123
   1: id=2007 mask=2007 serial=2007 time=1169373366 len=3 '123'

c) Receiver uses midas locally, sender uses mserver - doesn't work on windows

   1: python evprint.py dispatch
   2: python evsend.py --path 127.0.0.1/ 123
   1: (nothing printed)

d) The other way around - doesn't work on windows

   1: python evprint.py --path 127.0.0.1/ dispatch
   2: python evsend.py 123
   1: (nothing printed)

No such problem on linux.

3. Receiving/sending same events from the same process.
To reproduce this, just request events, send one and then try to receive
it � via cm_yield. I care for this, because I have a test in pymidas which
relies on this behavior.

hope this will help.

Shared memory problems

That sounds like you mix versions: You have an old executable (maybe your mlogger) which
has been linked against the old midas version, but you create the ODB with the new
odbedit or frontend. The new version complains if it finds an ODB from a previous version
(the error you reported first), but an old program does not have that version check, so
it finds a different binary ODB structure and crashes.

> Thanks for your help.  I tried again and it got me back to the initial problem I had.
>  The frontend will start, and the analyzer starts (complains about there not being a
> last.root, but other than that it's fine), and then when starting mlogger, I get:
> 
> [odb.c:860:db_validate_db] Warning: database corruption, first_free_key 0x0001A4
> 04
> [odb.c:3666:db_get_key] invalid key handle
> [midas.c:1970:cm_check_client] cannot delete client info
> [odb.c:3666:db_get_key] invalid key handle
> [midas.c:1970:cm_check_client] cannot delete client info
> [odb.c:3666:db_get_key] invalid key handle
> 
> 
> And it continues to shoot out error messages about invalid key handles until I kill
> it.  Then trying to start the frontend again fails until I remove the .ODB.SHM file. 
> Any other ideas?
> 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Just did a fresh install of MIDAS from the SVN repository under CentOS and
> > > everything compiles fine, but when I go to run the frontend (using dio), I get
> > > the following error message:
> > > 
> > > Connect to experiment ...[odb.c:868:db_open_database] Different database format:
> > >  Shared memory is 14, program is 2
> > > [midas.c:1763:cm_connect_experiment1] cannot open database
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any ideas on what the problem could be, or how to fix it?  
> > 
> > You have an old .ODB.SHM from a previous version in your directoy (note the '.' in
> > front, so you need a 'ls -alg' to see it). Delete that file and try again.

Shared memory problems

Thanks for your help.  I tried again and it got me back to the initial problem I had.
 The frontend will start, and the analyzer starts (complains about there not being a
last.root, but other than that it's fine), and then when starting mlogger, I get:

[odb.c:860:db_validate_db] Warning: database corruption, first_free_key 0x0001A4
04
[odb.c:3666:db_get_key] invalid key handle
[midas.c:1970:cm_check_client] cannot delete client info
[odb.c:3666:db_get_key] invalid key handle
[midas.c:1970:cm_check_client] cannot delete client info
[odb.c:3666:db_get_key] invalid key handle


And it continues to shoot out error messages about invalid key handles until I kill
it.  Then trying to start the frontend again fails until I remove the .ODB.SHM file. 
Any other ideas?

> > Hello,
> > 
> > Just did a fresh install of MIDAS from the SVN repository under CentOS and
> > everything compiles fine, but when I go to run the frontend (using dio), I get
> > the following error message:
> > 
> > Connect to experiment ...[odb.c:868:db_open_database] Different database format:
> >  Shared memory is 14, program is 2
> > [midas.c:1763:cm_connect_experiment1] cannot open database
> > 
> > 
> > Any ideas on what the problem could be, or how to fix it?  
> 
> You have an old .ODB.SHM from a previous version in your directoy (note the '.' in
> front, so you need a 'ls -alg' to see it). Delete that file and try again.

Shared memory problems

> Hello,
> 
> Just did a fresh install of MIDAS from the SVN repository under CentOS and
> everything compiles fine, but when I go to run the frontend (using dio), I get
> the following error message:
> 
> Connect to experiment ...[odb.c:868:db_open_database] Different database format:
>  Shared memory is 14, program is 2
> [midas.c:1763:cm_connect_experiment1] cannot open database
> 
> 
> Any ideas on what the problem could be, or how to fix it?  

You have an old .ODB.SHM from a previous version in your directoy (note the '.' in
front, so you need a 'ls -alg' to see it). Delete that file and try again.

Shared memory problems

Hello,

Just did a fresh install of MIDAS from the SVN repository under CentOS and
everything compiles fine, but when I go to run the frontend (using dio), I get
the following error message:

Connect to experiment ...[odb.c:868:db_open_database] Different database format:
 Shared memory is 14, program is 2
[midas.c:1763:cm_connect_experiment1] cannot open database


Any ideas on what the problem could be, or how to fix it?  


~Steve

Access to out_info from mana.c

I changed out_info into a global structure definition ANA_OUTPUT_INFO and put it into
midas.h, so it can be accessed easily from the user analyzer source code.

> Would it be relevant to transform out_info into a *non-static* variable of a type
> defined by a *named* struct?
> Currently,  programs that  try to access out_info cannot do it anymore; and they
> typically copy the struct definition from mana.c, which is not robust against future
> changes in mana.c.
> 
> If mana.c could be changed in the way described above, that would be great . 
> Otherwise, is it safe to patch it myself for local use?  or is there a better way of
> accessing out_info from mana.c?
> 
> As always, any help would be much appreciated :)
> 
> EOL
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Is it possible to access out_info (defined in mana.c) from another program?
> > 
> > In fact, out_info is now defined as an (anonymous) "static struct" in mana.c,
> > which it seems to me precludes any direct use in another program.  Is there an
> > indirect way of getting ahold of out_info?  or of the information it contains?
> > 
> > out_info used to be defined as a *non-static* struct, and the code I'm currently
> > modifying used to compile seamlessly: it now stops the compilation during
> > linking time, as out_info is now static and the program I have to compile
> > contains an "extern struct {} out_info".
> > 
> > Any help would be much appreciated!  I searched in vain in this forum for
> > details about out_info and I really need to access the information it contains!
> > 
> > EOL (a pure MIDAS novice)

317

05 Jan 2007

Eric-Olivier LE BIGOT

Suggestion

Access to out_info from mana.c

Would it be relevant to transform out_info into a *non-static* variable of a type
defined by a *named* struct?
Currently,  programs that  try to access out_info cannot do it anymore; and they
typically copy the struct definition from mana.c, which is not robust against future
changes in mana.c.

If mana.c could be changed in the way described above, that would be great . 
Otherwise, is it safe to patch it myself for local use?  or is there a better way of
accessing out_info from mana.c?

As always, any help would be much appreciated :)

EOL

> Hello,
> 
> Is it possible to access out_info (defined in mana.c) from another program?
> 
> In fact, out_info is now defined as an (anonymous) "static struct" in mana.c,
> which it seems to me precludes any direct use in another program.  Is there an
> indirect way of getting ahold of out_info?  or of the information it contains?
> 
> out_info used to be defined as a *non-static* struct, and the code I'm currently
> modifying used to compile seamlessly: it now stops the compilation during
> linking time, as out_info is now static and the program I have to compile
> contains an "extern struct {} out_info".
> 
> Any help would be much appreciated!  I searched in vain in this forum for
> details about out_info and I really need to access the information it contains!
> 
> EOL (a pure MIDAS novice)

316

27 Dec 2006

Eric-Olivier LE BIGOT

Forum

Access to out_info from mana.c

Hello,

Is it possible to access out_info (defined in mana.c) from another program?

In fact, out_info is now defined as an (anonymous) "static struct" in mana.c,
which it seems to me precludes any direct use in another program.  Is there an
indirect way of getting ahold of out_info?  or of the information it contains?

out_info used to be defined as a *non-static* struct, and the code I'm currently
modifying used to compile seamlessly: it now stops the compilation during
linking time, as out_info is now static and the program I have to compile
contains an "extern struct {} out_info".

Any help would be much appreciated!  I searched in vain in this forum for
details about out_info and I really need to access the information it contains!

EOL (a pure MIDAS novice)

Setup of Ortec ADC AD413A in MIDAS

We are new to MIDAS and try to setup a simple system with one ortec camac ADC
AD413A and the hytec1331 controler. Has anyone used this module in MIDAS we
would be grateful for the corresponding frontend.c etc. 

It would be very useful to have somewhere examples of files used by various
experiments in addition to the example files provided in the installation.

Best regards,
Hans

Build error with mana.c while using CERNLIB, svn 3366

Committed, thanks.

"make install" error on MacOS 10.4.7, svn 3366

> While executing "make install" under MacOS 10.4.7, you may encounter errors about "dio". It is the 
> problem of "Makefile". I did some change to it and attach the diff file here.

I committed your patch. Thank you.

"make install" error on MacOS 10.4.7, svn 3366

While executing "make install" under MacOS 10.4.7, you may encounter errors about "dio". It is the 
problem of "Makefile". I did some change to it and attach the diff file here.

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 119, 120, 121 ... 134, 135, 136 Next

ELOG V3.1.4-2e1708b5