 24 Jan 2024, Pavel Murat, Bug Report, Warnings about ODB keys that haven't been touched for 10+ years
|
I don't immediately see a reason for saying that if a DB key is older than 10 yrs, it may not be valid.
However, it would be worth learning what was the logic behind choosing 10 yrs as a threshold.
|
|
28 Jan 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Warnings about ODB keys that haven't been touched for 10+ years
|
> I don't immediately see a reason for saying that if a DB key is older than 10 yrs, it may not be valid.
>
> However, it would be worth learning what was the logic behind choosing 10 yrs as a threshold.
|
|
28 Jan 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, Warnings about ODB keys that haven't been touched for 10+ years
|
> Please run "git blame" to find out who added that check.
OK ok, was me. But actually 2003. I hope that this being more than 20y ago excuses me not remembering it ;-)
|
 03 Feb 2024, Pavel Murat, Bug Report, string --> int64 conversion in the python interface ?
|
Dear MIDAS experts,
I gave a try to the MIDAS python interface and ran all tests available in midas/python/tests.
|
|
10 Mar 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Autostart program
|
Hello everyone,
It seems that if a frontend is started automatically by using Program->Auto start then the status page does not show it as started. This is since the FE |
|
11 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Autostart program
|
> It seems that if a frontend is started automatically by using Program->Auto start then the status page does not show it as started. This is since the
FE name has a number after the name. If I stop and start manually then the status page shows the correct state of the FE. Am I doing something wrong or
is this a bug somewhere?
|
|
18 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
I tried to update MIDAS installation on Ubuntu 22.04.1 to the latest commit at
the bitbucket.
|
|
18 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> [ 34%] Linking CXX executable manalyzer_test.exe
> /usr/bin/ld: /home/astrocent/workspace/root/root_install/lib/libRIO.so: undefined
> reference to
|
19 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error 
|
Dear Konstantin,
Thank you for your interest in my problem.
|
|
19 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
ok, thank you for your information. I cannot reproduce this problem, I use vanilla Ubuntu
LTS 22, ROOT binary kit root_v6.30.02.Linux-ubuntu22.04-x86_64-gcc11.4 from root.cern.ch
and latest midas from git.
|
|
19 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> ok, thank you for your information. I cannot reproduce this problem, I use vanilla Ubuntu
> LTS 22, ROOT binary kit root_v6.30.02.Linux-ubuntu22.04-x86_64-gcc11.4 from root.cern.ch
> and latest midas from git.
|
|
28 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
I found solution for my trouble. With MIDAS and ROOT everything is OK,
the trobule was with my Ubuntu enviroment.
|
|
02 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> I found solution for my trouble. With MIDAS and ROOT everything is OK,
> the trobule was with my Ubuntu enviroment.
|
|
15 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, open MIDAS RPC ports
|
we had a bit of trouble with open network ports recently and I now think security of MIDAS RPC
ports needs to be tightened.
|
|
15 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, open MIDAS RPC ports
|
One thing coming to my mind is the interface binding. If you have a midas host with two networks
("global" and "local"=192.168.x.x), you can tell to which interface a socket should bind.
By default it binds both interfaces, but we could restrict the socket only to bind to the local
|
|
30 Apr 2024, Luigi Vigani, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Good afternoon,
After updating Midas to the latest develop commit
|
|
03 May 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Could you please export and send me the /Sequencer ODB tree (or just /Sequencer/Param and /Sequencer/Variables) in both cases while the sequence is running.
|
|
03 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Ok, here is the complete code to reproduce the problem. Load parameter_test.msl which includes functions.msl. From the screenshot you see the variables
containing
garbage, and you also see that from the ODB screenshot. For completeness, I added Sequencer.json which contains the whole sequencer tree.
|
|
03 May 2024, Luigi Vigani, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
It is pretty much the same as Stefan, I attach here the screenshots. Also in my case it works sometimes, and sometimes partially (one or 2 params, like
in
attachment 3).
|
|
03 May 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
I have been able to reproduce the problem only once. From what I see, it seems that the Variables ODB tree is not initialized properly from the Param tree.
Below are the messages from the failed run compared to a successful one. As far as I could see, the javascript code does not change anything in the Variables
ODB tree (only monitors it). The actual changes are done by the sequencer program, or am I wrong?
|