| ID |
Date |
Author |
Topic |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
2255
|
09 Jul 2021 |
Ben Smith | Forum | Problem with python file reader | Hi Francesco,
Can you send me an example file to look at |
|
|
2254
|
08 Jul 2021 |
Francesco Renga | Forum | Problem with python file reader | Dear experts,
while trying to readout a MIDAS file
from a python script. I get the error below |
|
|
2253
|
30 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Fix | changes in history plots | > I am updating the history plots.
> So the idea is to use this computation:
> y_position_on_plot = offset + factor*(formula(history_value) |
|
|
2252
|
30 Jun 2021 |
Lukas Gerritzen | Bug Report | modbcheckbox behaves erroneous with UINT32 variables | Thanks for the quick fix. |
|
|
2251
|
30 Jun 2021 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | I quickly checked the pull request and could
not find any obvious problem, so I merged
it. |
|
|
2250
|
30 Jun 2021 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | modbcheckbox behaves erroneous with UINT32 variables | > For boolean and INT32 variables, modbcheckbox
works as expected. You click, it
> sets the variable to true or 1, the checkbox |
|
|
2249
|
29 Jun 2021 |
Lukas Gerritzen | Bug Report | modbcheckbox behaves erroneous with UINT32 variables | For boolean and INT32 variables, modbcheckbox
works as expected. You click, it
sets the variable to true or 1, the checkbox |
|
|
2248
|
29 Jun 2021 |
Marco Francesconi | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | I just submitted a pull request for this feature,
I did quite a lot of testing and it looks
good to me.
|
|
|
2247
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Marco Francesconi | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | My idea was to collect some feedback instead
of blindly submitting code for a pull request.
|
|
|
2246
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | > ... at MEG, we keep hundreds of XML files
for configuration. Mostly historical, but
that's how it is.
|
|
|
2245
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | > > > > Hi all,
> > > > for my experiment we ended up with
the need of changing lot of parameters (~9000 |
|
|
2244
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | > > > Hi all,
> > > for my experiment we ended up with
the need of changing lot of parameters (~9000 |
|
|
2243
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | > > Hi all,
> > for my experiment we ended up with the
need of changing lot of parameters (~9000 |
|
|
2242
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | > Hi all,
> for my experiment we ended up with the
need of changing lot of parameters (~9000 |
|
|
2241
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | > Hi all,
> for my experiment we ended up with the
need of changing lot of parameters (~9000 |
|
|
2240
|
28 Jun 2021 |
Marco Francesconi | Suggestion | ODB Load in Sequencer | Hi all,
for my experiment we ended up with the need
of changing lot of parameters (~9000 values) |
|
|
2239
|
25 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Fix | changes in history plots | I will have to post an example of a scaled
plot. I figure everybody forgot how they
look like.
|
|
|
2238
|
25 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Fix | changes in history plots | > > The only "correct" way in my opinion is
to implement two vertical axis, as can be
seen in some papers. One for the HV, and |
|
|
2237
|
25 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Fix | changes in history plots | > I disagree ...
I am happy with disagreement and differences |
|
|
2236
|
25 Jun 2021 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Fix | changes in history plots | > A general warning: With the recent history
changes implemented in the develop branch,
starting from a fresh ODB and editing
|
|