| ID |
Date |
Author |
Topic |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
3032
|
30 Apr 2025 |
Pavel Murat | Info | New ODB++ API | it is a very convenient interface! Does it
support the ODB links in the path names ?
-- thanks, regards, Pasha |
|
|
3031
|
30 Apr 2025 |
Stefan Ritt | Info | New ODB++ API | I had to change the ODBXX API: https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/commits/273c4e434795453c0c6bceb46bac9a0d2d27db18
The old C API is case-insensitive, meaning |
|
|
3030
|
29 Apr 2025 |
Pavel Murat | Bug Report | ODBXX : ODB links in the path names ? | Dear MIDAS experts,
does the ODBXX interface to ODB currently |
|
|
3029
|
16 Apr 2025 |
Thomas Lindner | Info | MIDAS workshop (online) Sept 22-23, 2025 | Dear MIDAS enthusiasts,
We are planning a fifth MIDAS workshop, following |
|
|
3028
|
08 Apr 2025 |
Lukas Mandokk | Info | MSL Syntax Highlighting Extension for VSCode (Release) | Hello everyone,
I just wanted to let you know,
that I published a MSL Syntax Highlighting |
|
|
3027
|
07 Apr 2025 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | If people are simultaneously editing scripts
this is indeed an issue, which probably never
can be resolved by technical means. It need |
|
|
3026
|
07 Apr 2025 |
Zaher Salman | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | [quote="Lukas Gerritzen"]
I also encountered a small annoyance in the
current workflow of editing sequencer files |
|
|
3025
|
02 Apr 2025 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | And there is one more argument:
We have a Python expert in our development |
|
|
3024
|
02 Apr 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | > I once looked at using LUA for this
>
> > but I think basing off an full featured |
|
|
3023
|
02 Apr 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | MIDAS history system not using the event timestamps ? | > > You can always include your "true" data
timestamp as the first value in your data.
>
|
|
|
3022
|
02 Apr 2025 |
Pavel Murat | Bug Report | MIDAS history system not using the event timestamps ? | > You can always include your "true" data
timestamp as the first value in your data.
|
|
|
3021
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Pavel Murat | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | I once looked at using LUA for this,
> but I think basing off an full featured
programming language like python
|
|
|
3020
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | MIDAS history system not using the event timestamps ? | > I confirm that when writing out history
files corresponding to the slow control event
data,
|
|
|
3019
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | > ODBSET "/Path/value[1,3,5]"
> ODBSET "/Path/value[1-5,7-9]"
|
|
|
3018
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | ODB corruption | We see ODB corruption crashes in the DS20k
vertical slice MIDAS instance.
|
|
|
3017
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Fix | ODB and event buffer - release semaphore before abort() and core dump | There is a long standing problem with ODB
and event buffers. If they detect an
internal data inconsistency and cannot continue |
|
|
3016
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | The extended ODBSET[x,y1-y2,z] could make
sense to be implemented, since it then will
match the alarm system which uses the same |
|
|
3015
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Stefan Ritt | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | A new sequencer which understands Python is
in the works. There you can use all features
from that language.
|
|
|
3014
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Lukas Gerritzen | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | While trying to simplify the existing spaghetti
code, I encountered problems with type safety.
Compare the following:
|
|
|
3013
|
01 Apr 2025 |
Lukas Gerritzen | Suggestion | Sequencer ODBSET feature requests | I would like to request the following sequencer
features if you find the ideas as sensible
as I do:
|
|