I am thinking to divide my definition xml file into several files.

I do not know if there is a general way, but I found some web pages mentioning about it. According to 
these pages we can include an xml document to  other one like.

---------- booklist.xml ------------
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE books [
<!ENTITY book1 SYSTEM "book1.xml">
]>

<books>
  &book1;
</books>
------------------------------------
------------ book1.xml -------------
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<book>
  <title>Title of the book</title>
  <author>Author of the book</author>
</book>
------------------------------------

Is it possible to do it with mxml ?


I have two reasons.
1.
 I have two ROME programs.  I call them as "writer" and "reader" in this message. "reader" reads output 
file from "writer". In this case, "reader" needs to know the structure of branch folder defined in "writer"'s 
xml file.
What I am doing is adding headers of "writer" to DictionaryHeaders in Makefile.user of "reader". At least, 
it works, but this way I have to write reading function of trees by hand. On the other hand, If it is 
possible to include a part of xml file of "writer" in that of "reader", romebuilder can create proper 
functions automatically.

2.
 My project definition file is already big. It has more than 2000 lines. If one has good XML editor, it may 
not be a problem. But unfortunately I do not know good editor on Linux. What I am thinking is making a 
directory structure like this.
.
|-- main_definition.xml
`-- xml
    |-- folders
    |   |-- folder_1.xml
    |   |-- folder_2.xml
    |   `-- folder_3.xml
    `-- tasks
        |-- task_1.xml
        |-- task_2.xml
        `-- task_3.xml

folder_[1-3].xml and task_[1-3].xml will be included in main_definition.xml.

> I am thinking to divide my definition xml file into several files.
> 
> I do not know if there is a general way, but I found some web pages mentioning about it. According to 
> these pages we can include an xml document to  other one like.
> 
> ---------- booklist.xml ------------
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <!DOCTYPE books [
> <!ENTITY book1 SYSTEM "book1.xml">
> ]>
> 
> <books>
>   &book1;
> </books>
> ------------------------------------
> ------------ book1.xml -------------
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <book>
>   <title>Title of the book</title>
>   <author>Author of the book</author>
> </book>
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Is it possible to do it with mxml ?

I made a patch to enable it with mxml.
Please test it.

If it is reliable, I will commit it.

----
cd $ROMESYS
patch -p0 < mxml.diff  
----

> I made a patch to enable it with mxml.
> Please test it.
> 
> If it is reliable, I will commit it.
> 
> ----
> cd $ROMESYS
> patch -p0 < mxml.diff  
> ----

I modified bugs, and commited.

Dear all,
           I need to perform a DB query in ROME, where I have to select an array of 

About configuration XML files.

Now we merged ROME and ARGUS.
So I expect that users often have several configuration files for one project.

But I realized many people don't know that they can specify configuration file.

So I propose following scheme.

* When a program starts, it searches all XML files located in current directory which has <Configuration> tag at the top.
* If it does not find any XML file, it asks user to generate new one.
   * ask configuration type [R/A/M/N]
   * ask filename. Default is romeConfig.xml
* If it find only one XML file, it reads the XML file.
* If it find several XML files, it asks user which file should be used with a prompt like,
     Which configuration file do you use ?
      [1] filename1.xml
      [2] romeConfig.xml
      [3] filename2.xml
      [q] quit program
* When user starts program with option -c, it asks creates new configuration anyway.
* When user starts program with option -i, it uses specified file.

done.
Program searches configuration XML file in ./ and ./config

I am Daniele Barbareschi, I am a Corrado Gatto's student 
I work to interfacing between ALIROOT and MYSQL for CONSTANT CALIBRATION of 
subdetector.

There's a bug in compiling...

NAME of file "ROMEXML.h,ROMEXML.cpp" in the ultimate version ROME is lowercase.
The gmake program return error.

Maybe ROMESQL too.
See you those files and similar.

D.B.

Followings are warning message from compiler, please check if they are correct.
When I changed line-490 like,
     490       while ((obj = iterFolders->Next())) {
warning disappeared.

ROMEAnalyzer.cpp:490: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
//get folder names
     485       TObject *obj;
     486       TObjArray *names = new TObjArray(100);
     487 
     488       TCollection *folders = folder->GetListOfFolders();
     489       TIterator *iterFolders = folders->MakeIterator();
     490       while (obj = iterFolders->Next()) {
     491          ROMEString str;
     492          str.SetFormatted("%s",obj->GetName());
     493          names->Add(new TObjString(str.Data()));
     494       }
     495 


ROMEString.cpp:74: warning: `int numberOfDigits' might be used uninitialized in this function
ROMEXMLDataBase.cpp:83: warning: `ROMEXML*xml' might be used uninitialized in this function

Dear all,

Under the environment with GCC4.8.5 and ROOT6.08.04,
we get the following warning messages when compiling XXXAnalyzer3, XXXAnalyzer4, 
XXXConfig, XXXConfig2,3,4, XXXDBAccess, and XXXConfigToForm.


In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
                 from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
                 from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
                 from <command-line>:0:
/usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
 #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
    ^
[345/369] compiling obj/MEGAnalyzer4.o
In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
                 from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
                 from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
                 from <command-line>:0:
/usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
 #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
    ^

It seems due to 'NOOPT' flag added to those objects in the Makefile.
Is the 'NOOPT' flag necessary? If not, how can we remove it?

Regards,
Yusuke

Hi Yusuke

NOOPT is added for potentially large source files to reduce the compile time and memory usage.

I guess -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE option is added in your project Makefile or in your environment variable, instead of by 
ROME.
However, we could modify ROME to explicitly disable it by adding -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to NOOPT.
That can be done by modifying builder/src/ROMEBuildMakeFile.cpp line 1348.

Could you try to do it ?

Ryu


> Dear all,
> 
> Under the environment with GCC4.8.5 and ROOT6.08.04,
> we get the following warning messages when compiling XXXAnalyzer3, XXXAnalyzer4, 
> XXXConfig, XXXConfig2,3,4, XXXDBAccess, and XXXConfigToForm.
> 
> 
> In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
>                  from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
> gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
>                  from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
>                  from <command-line>:0:
> /usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
> with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
>  #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
>     ^
> [345/369] compiling obj/MEGAnalyzer4.o
> In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
>                  from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
> gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
>                  from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
>                  from <command-line>:0:
> /usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
> with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
>  #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
>     ^
> 
> It seems due to 'NOOPT' flag added to those objects in the Makefile.
> Is the 'NOOPT' flag necessary? If not, how can we remove it?
> 
> Regards,
> Yusuke

Hi Ryu,

Thank you.
You are right. We add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 in CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in our project Makefile.
If we remove it, the warnings go away.

I tried your suggestion but I got the following warning: 

[346/369] compiling obj/MEGAnalyzer3.o
<command-line>:0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by default]
<command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition

However, if I add 
'-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE' instead the warning above disappears.

Do you think it is OK for all?

Regards,
Yusuke

> Hi Yusuke
> 
> NOOPT is added for potentially large source files to reduce the compile time and memory usage.
> 
> I guess -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE option is added in your project Makefile or in your environment variable, instead of by 
> ROME.
> However, we could modify ROME to explicitly disable it by adding -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to NOOPT.
> That can be done by modifying builder/src/ROMEBuildMakeFile.cpp line 1348.
> 
> Could you try to do it ?
> 
> Ryu
> 
> 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > Under the environment with GCC4.8.5 and ROOT6.08.04,
> > we get the following warning messages when compiling XXXAnalyzer3, XXXAnalyzer4, 
> > XXXConfig, XXXConfig2,3,4, XXXDBAccess, and XXXConfigToForm.
> > 
> > 
> > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
> >                  from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
> > gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
> >                  from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
> >                  from <command-line>:0:
> > /usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
> > with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
> >  #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
> >     ^
> > [345/369] compiling obj/MEGAnalyzer4.o
> > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
> >                  from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
> > gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
> >                  from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
> >                  from <command-line>:0:
> > /usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
> > with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
> >  #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
> >     ^
> > 
> > It seems due to 'NOOPT' flag added to those objects in the Makefile.
> > Is the 'NOOPT' flag necessary? If not, how can we remove it?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Yusuke

Hi.

Thank you for testing.

-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE is fine, and can be implemented in ROME.

Ryu

> Hi Ryu,
> 
> Thank you.
> You are right. We add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 in CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in our project Makefile.
> If we remove it, the warnings go away.
> 
> I tried your suggestion but I got the following warning: 
> 
> [346/369] compiling obj/MEGAnalyzer3.o
> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by default]
> <command-line>:0:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> 
> However, if I add 
> '-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE' instead the warning above disappears.
> 
> Do you think it is OK for all?
> 
> Regards,
> Yusuke
> 
> > Hi Yusuke
> > 
> > NOOPT is added for potentially large source files to reduce the compile time and memory usage.
> > 
> > I guess -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE option is added in your project Makefile or in your environment variable, instead of by 
> > ROME.
> > However, we could modify ROME to explicitly disable it by adding -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to NOOPT.
> > That can be done by modifying builder/src/ROMEBuildMakeFile.cpp line 1348.
> > 
> > Could you try to do it ?
> > 
> > Ryu
> > 
> > 
> > > Dear all,
> > > 
> > > Under the environment with GCC4.8.5 and ROOT6.08.04,
> > > we get the following warning messages when compiling XXXAnalyzer3, XXXAnalyzer4, 
> > > XXXConfig, XXXConfig2,3,4, XXXDBAccess, and XXXConfigToForm.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
> > >                  from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
> > > gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
> > >                  from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
> > >                  from <command-line>:0:
> > > /usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
> > > with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
> > >  #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
> > >     ^
> > > [345/369] compiling obj/MEGAnalyzer4.o
> > > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
> > >                  from /meg/data1/shared/mc/benchmark_test/rome3-root6.08.04-
> > > gcc485/include/ROMEAnalyzer.h:10,
> > >                  from include/generated/MEGPrecompile.h:23,
> > >                  from <command-line>:0:
> > > /usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling 
> > > with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
> > >  #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)
> > >     ^
> > > 
> > > It seems due to 'NOOPT' flag added to those objects in the Makefile.
> > > Is the 'NOOPT' flag necessary? If not, how can we remove it?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Yusuke

Hi All,

Is there any way in ROME that I can clear histograms at:

    1)Run start.
    2) Clear by group (tab) ?


Thanks a lot!
Sudeshna

          <Histogram>
            <HistName>MyHisto</HistName>
            <HistAccumulate>false</HistAccumulate>
          </Histogram>

We sometimes want to use trees in ROME.

One way is to read it by TSocket connection. But treees are larger than histograms in general, and it 
takes time to download. 
 And I need to make shared library when I changed the structure of folders.

So, I want to propose is to prepare Cint mode with continueing analysis in background.

Currently, when user press "i", ROME stops analysis and goes into cint mode. This is good for offline 
mode, but this is not good for online mode. So I propose that when user press "I", ROME goes cint 
mode, and continue analysis in background.

Then we can see Trees at run time.

In addition, If you are going to implement this feature, please prepare short way to call trees in cint mode.
If I understand correctly, the way to call a tree is like,
gAnalyzer->GetTreeObjectAt(0)->GetTree()->Draw("");
but it is too long to use in interactively and we need to remeber the number of trees.
gAnalyzer->GetTree("trigger")->Draw();  is better.

I tried to make changeable folder a branch of tree.
I could process data. Rome succeeded to write the tree.

But when I tried to draw a leaf of the branch, root complains that the class name is invalid.

Dear all,

From the recent release of MIDAS, "midas-2019-06", the MIDAS library path is changed:
it was $MIDASSYS/linux/lib, but now $MIDASSYS/lib.
See https://midas.triumf.ca/elog/Midas/1564 for the detail.

Due to this change, ROME analyzers cannot be built with -midas option.

The solution seems easy: change the path in 
$ROMESYS/buildersrc/ROMEBuilderMakeFile.cpp AddDAQLibraries().
However, directly changing the code will loose backward compatibility.
Do you have any suggestions?

Regards,
Yusuke

Hi All,

Suppose I want to pause a run, at the middle, and change some run conditions. So
I want to clear histograms at the middle of a run. Is that possible to do in ROME?

That when I pause the run, I want to clear histograms. So with the new run
conditions, when we resume that run, we will get clear pads and histograms will
be filled in new.


Thanks a lot!
Sudeshna