> 
> Thanks for the detailed explanation.  I agree with your recommendations.  I was mostly interested in having both options treated equally in the documentation.
> 

I did not review the documentation yet, so it is most likely completely wrong.

But in the nutshell, we should document 2 configurations:

1) standalone mhttpd - with built-in https and password protection
2) mhttpd behind a password-protected https proxy (apache httpd) - mhttpd will have https and built-in passwords disabled, http access restricted to localhost (or the host of the httpd, if they are not the same - as at CERN/ALPHA).

K.O.