We're using mhttpd for calls that end up working better with asynchronous requests, and we've built up sort of a parallel, asynchronous library using javascript Promises.

The Promises (which are in the ES6 spec) have worked incredibly well for building well-behaved, sequential calls to mhttpd.  Personally, I also find their syntax much easier to wrap my
head around, especially compared to callbacks.

I'd be happy to add these functions to midas.js if there's general interest. 

> If using a synchronous AJAX call, such as "foo=ODBGet("/runinfo/state");", google chrome will prints this to the javascript console:
> 
> "Synchronous XMLHttpRequest on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to the end user's experience. For more help, check http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/."
> 
> The referenced URL has this text:
> 
> "Synchronous XMLHttpRequest outside of workers is in the process of being removed from the web platform as it has detrimental effects to the end user's experience. (This is a long 
> process that takes many years.) Developers must not pass false for the async argument when the JavaScript global environment is a document environment. User agents are strongly 
> encouraged to warn about such usage in developer tools and may experiment with throwing an InvalidAccessError exception when it occurs."
> 
> Then jQuery say this: http://api.jquery.com/jquery.ajax/
> 
> "As of jQuery 1.8, the use of async: false with jqXHR ($.Deferred) is deprecated; you must use the success/error/complete callback options instead of the corresponding methods of the 
> jqXHR object such as jqXHR.done() or the deprecated jqXHR.success()."
> 
> This sounds rather severe but one must flow with the flow. Synchronous RPC is out, async is in.
> 
> Many of the old MIDAS AJAX functions are fully synchronous (i.e. "foo=ODBGet("/blah");"), some more recent ones support both sync and async use (i.e. ODBMCopy()).
> 
> All the newly added functions *must* by async-only. For example, all the new JSON-RPC functions are async-only and require the use of callbacks to get at the data.
> 
> Converting existing javascript custom pages from sync AJAX (hah! it's SJAX, not AJAX) will require some work, and one might as well start today.
> 
> Personally, I think this excessive use of callbacks for all javascript web page programming is an unnecessary PITA, but I also do understand the motivation
> of people who write web browsers and javascript engines - removal of support for synchronous RPC makes many things much simpler -
> and even small speedup of javascript execution and better browser efficiency is welcome improvements (but not free improvements - as old web pages need to be converted).
> 
> K.O.