Hi

> On one side, such checksums help me confirm that uncompressed data contents is the same as original 
> data (compression/decompression is okey).
> 

> I can write the computed checksums into midas.log, or into runNNN.crc32, runNNN.sha256, etc files. (or 
> both).
> 

Just a thought on my side. I have been using a checksum, on data produced  by our experiments via mlogger, the runxxxx.mid.gz, in 
the same manner you proposed and I see now implemented. 

I have a slight, objection, if I may call it that, to how the checksum is saved to disk, in 
run00007.mid.gz.sha256 as an example.


$ cat ~/Data/run00007.mid.gz.sha256
f315af7caf6ca204cc082132862cb4227d77066cb60c6e2b1039d6dc5b04d1ee 650597 Data/run00007.mid.gz


It seems a little misleading to have the gzip'd filename paired with the checksum of the uncompressed content.

May I suggest that the pairing should be ,

f315af7caf6ca204cc082132862cb4227d77066cb60c6e2b1039d6dc5b04d1ee  run00007.mid as an example.

As I find, this information will sit in an archive, database in my case for a long period, and it might
be confusing later on, when verification of the checksum is required.