> Confirmed, this is a bug in mlogger. It should be creating *2* files, one with the before-compression checksum and one with the after-compression checksum. At 
> least both checksums are written to midas.log, so you can grep them from there. K.O.

This should be fixed now. Thank you for nudging me.

K.O.



> 
> > Hi
> > 
> > > On one side, such checksums help me confirm that uncompressed data contents is the same as original 
> > > data (compression/decompression is okey).
> > > 
> > 
> > > I can write the computed checksums into midas.log, or into runNNN.crc32, runNNN.sha256, etc files. (or 
> > > both).
> > > 
> > 
> > Just a thought on my side. I have been using a checksum, on data produced  by our experiments via mlogger, the runxxxx.mid.gz, in 
> > the same manner you proposed and I see now implemented. 
> > 
> > I have a slight, objection, if I may call it that, to how the checksum is saved to disk, in 
> > run00007.mid.gz.sha256 as an example.
> > 
> > 
> > $ cat ~/Data/run00007.mid.gz.sha256
> > f315af7caf6ca204cc082132862cb4227d77066cb60c6e2b1039d6dc5b04d1ee 650597 Data/run00007.mid.gz
> > 
> > 
> > It seems a little misleading to have the gzip'd filename paired with the checksum of the uncompressed content.
> > 
> > May I suggest that the pairing should be ,
> > 
> > f315af7caf6ca204cc082132862cb4227d77066cb60c6e2b1039d6dc5b04d1ee  run00007.mid as an example.
> > 
> > As I find, this information will sit in an archive, database in my case for a long period, and it might
> > be confusing later on, when verification of the checksum is required.