> I would like to store the address of 1-Wire temperature sensors in a device
> driver. However, the supportet data types (as definded around
> include/midas.h:311) do not foresee a type large enough.
>

Hmm... you do not say what sensor you use and how many bits you actually need.

For up to 32 bits you can use TID_DWORD (uint32_t) (obviously)

For up to 48 bits (or so), you can use TID_DOUBLE (double) (wierd, but IEEE754 double precision variables would work as 48-bit (or so) integers).

For more, I would use arrays of TID_DWORD (64 bits, store low 32 bits into a[0], high bits into a[1]).

> 
> Is there a good reason against this?
> 

We had requests for implementing uint64_t 64-bit data types in MIDAS before. There are two problems:

a) in the MIDAS data banks, there is a problem with the bank header definition which only has 3 DWORDSs so causes
each alternating data bank to be 64-bit misaligned. And misaligned 64-bit data is very bad.

b) in ODB, 64-bit data support will need to be added from scratch and again it is not clear without doing it
if there will be any alignement problems. If one were to implement ODB from scratch, one would have everything
aligned to 64-bits or maybe even 128-bits, with uint64_t fully supported.

It is unlikely this kind of work will ever be done on ODB, but who knows.

> I know that other experiments use this kind of sensor, how do you store the
> addresses? I've noticed that most of the address is just zeroes, but I wouldn't
> like to store just half the address, assuming that half the address is always
> zeroes.

Cannot answer without knowing what sensor you use, but certainly you can use an array of bytes
or an array of integers to store arbitrarily long addresses. You can also use a TID_STRING
and store the address as a text string "0xabcdabcdabcdabcd" of arbitrary length.

K.O.