hi, 

> > That makes things more 
> > complicated than needed. In the normal FE framework, you can define either several equipment 
> > served by one frontend, or even one equipment linked to several devices. In the MEG experiment 
> > we have one slow control frontend controlling ~100 devices without problem. In the old days 
> there 
> > was a problem that some slow devices could throttle the readout, but since the invention of 
> multi-
> > threaded slow control equipment, each device gets its own thread so they don't block each 
> other.
> 

I agree with Stefan, that it's probably better to run a multi-threaded setup, than individual frontends.

The only place I've ever used the frontend index on startup is when I was testing and building
an eventbuilder.

https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Event_Builder#Example

This might explain, why your history is swapping between frontends, as in the event builder, it gets
reconstructed.

Maybe this helps...

LCP


> Perhaps things have changed in the 10 years since the FGD SC code was written. I can do it 
> differently but doing it that way seemed naturual since around 90% of the frontend code that I
> have see does it that way.