I wonder why do you this via ODB links. The "standard" way of writing to the history should be to create events for an equipment and flag this equipment as being written to the
history. All variables under /Equipment/<name>/Variables then automatically go into the history and you don't have to worry about ODB links. Only variables not fitting the
equipment/variables scheme should be dealt with via ODB links, like variables under equipment/statistics or parameters in another ODB tree. In a typical midas experiment, only
very few variables typically go into the 'System' event. This is however probably not a solution to your problem. If you have a similar structure (doubles plus an odd number of floats)
under 'variables', you might get the same error. I'n in contact with KO to fix this problem at the root level.

Stefan

> Logging a list of variables to the history via links in the history ODB subtree,
> we get messages as follows at every run start:
> 
> 19:43:24.009 2019/10/06 [Logger,ERROR] [history_schema.cxx:2676:hs_write_event,ERROR] Event 'System' data size mismatch: expected 412 bytes, got 416 bytes
> 
> 19:43:24.008 2019/10/06 [Logger,ERROR] [history_schema.cxx:2676:hs_write_event,ERROR] Event 'System' data size mismatch: expected 412 bytes, got 416 bytes
> 
> 19:43:23.850 2019/10/06 [Logger,ERROR] [history_schema.cxx:455:hs_write_event,ERROR] Event 'System' data size mismatch count: 25, expected 412 bytes, hs_write_event() called with as much as 416 bytes
> 
> 19:43:23.850 2019/10/06 [Logger,ERROR] [history_schema.cxx:455:hs_write_event,ERROR] Event 'System' data size mismatch count: 25, expected 412 bytes, hs_write_event() called with as much as 416 bytes
> 
> The history calculates the size of a record from the size of the individual variables, (history_schema.cxx, L2666 ff), whereas the ODB delivers the data aligned/padded to the size of the largest value in the record.
> In our history, a long list of doubles (64 Bit) fas followed by three floats (32 bit), leading to a padded response from the ODB, 4 byte longer than the history expects.
> Quick fix: Add another 32 bit dummy variable to the history. Gets rid of the error messages...
> Should probably be fixed at a deeper level...