> I don't immediately see a reason for saying that if a DB key is older than 10 yrs, it may not be valid.
> 
> However, it would be worth learning what was the logic behind choosing 10 yrs as a threshold. 
> If 10 is just a more or less arbitrary number, changing 10 --> 100 seems to be the way to go.

Please run "git blame" to find out who added that check.

If I remember right, it was added to complain/correct dates in the future.

I think the oldest experiment at TRIUMF where we still can load an odb into current MIDAS is TWIST,
now about 25 years old. the purpose of loading odb would be to test the history function
to see if we can look at 10-15 year old histories. (TWIST history is in the latest FILE format,
so it will load).

I think this age check should be removed, but there must be *some* check for invalid/bogus timestamps. Or 
not, we should check if MIDAS cares about timestamps at all, if ODB functions never use/look at timestamp, 
maybe we are okey with bogus timestamps. They may look funny in the odb editor, but that's it.

K.O.