| ID | Date | Author  | Topic | Subject | Text |  | 
| 2859 | 24 Sep 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Suggestion | Clean up compiler warning in manalyzer | > > I like the look of std::format, looks cleaner than string streams
 >
 |  | 
| 2863 | 07 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | > We're trying to install the SuperCDMS version of MIDAS on a Rocky 9.4 Virtual
 > Machine and are getting a persistent error
 |  | 
| 2867 | 08 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | > I've uploaded the current core dump at: https://gitlab.com/det-lab/coredumps#.
 
 |  | 
| 2868 | 08 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | I read these error messages. There is no ODB corruption. ODB semaphore is locked and all
 midas programs will fail, they will timeout
 |  | 
| 2869 | 08 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | > Basically I think Rocky 9.4 is a red herring. 
 This is what likely happened:
 |  | 
| 2870 | 08 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | > I read these error messages. There is no ODB corruption. ODB semaphore is locked and
 all midas programs will fail...
 |  | 
| 2876 | 13 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | Thank you for the stack trace, I fixed the buglet that cause midas programs to crash
 twice,
 |  | 
| 2879 | 18 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | > [aroberts@sdfcdmsdaq midas]$ odbedit > [ODBEdit,ERROR] [odb.cxx:2043:db_open_database,ERROR]
 Removed ODB client 'ODBEdit', index 0 because
 |  | 
| 2880 | 18 Oct 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | > suddenly, an ODB semaphore timeout... 
 I am wondering if something bizarre is going
 |  | 
| 2896 | 15 Nov 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Suggestion | Issue with creating banks | > Hello, I am a coop student working at SNOLAB. > void* data_acquisition_thread(void* param)
 > {
 |  | 
| 2897 | 15 Nov 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Info | New sequencer command ODBLOOKUP | > A new sequencer command "ODBLOOKUP" has been implemented, which does a lookup of
 a string in a string
 |  | 
| 2902 | 22 Nov 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | ODB lock timeout, Difficulty running MIDAS on Rocky 9.4 | > try to replicate the issue ... 
 I see ODB lock timeout (and abort() of everything)
 |  | 
| 2906 | 27 Nov 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TMFE::Sleep()  errors | > [tmfe.cxx:1033:TMFE::Sleep,ERROR] select() returned -1, errno 22 (Invalid argument).
 
 |  | 
| 2907 | 27 Nov 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TMFE::Sleep()  errors | > > I wonder also if now that midas requires
 stricter/newer c++ standards if there maybe
 |  | 
| 2908 | 27 Nov 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TMFE::Sleep()  errors | >       status = select(1, &fdset, NULL, NULL, &timeout);
 >
 |  | 
| 2915 | 04 Dec 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | ODB key picker does not close when creating link / Edit-on-run string box too large | > > Actual result: > > The key picker does not close.
 >
 |  | 
| 2916 | 05 Dec 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | ODB key picker does not close when creating link / Edit-on-run string box too large | > > Another more minor visual problem is the edit-on-start dialog. There seems to be no
 upper bound to the
 |  | 
| 2918 | 06 Dec 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TMFE::Sleep()  errors | > >       status = select(1, &fdset, NULL, NULL, &timeout);
 > >       On error, -1 is returned, ... timeout
 |  | 
| 2919 | 06 Dec 2024 | Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TMFE::Sleep()  errors | > Commit [develop 06735d29] improve TMFE::Sleep() 
 Report of test_sleep on Ubuntu-22 (Intel
 |  | 
| 2927 | 01 Jan 2025 | Konstantin Olchanski | Forum | time ordering of run transition calls to TMFeEquipment things | > I have a question about "tmfe approach" to implementing MIDAS frontends. If I read
 the code correctly,
 |  |