> > > For ODB keys of type TID_KEY, the value num_values IS the number of subkeys. 
> > 
> > this logic makes sense, however it doesn't seem to be consistent with the printout of the test example
> > at the end of https://daq00.triumf.ca/elog-midas/Midas/240203_095803/a.cc . The printout reports 
> > 
> > key.num_values = 1, but the actual number of subkeys = 6, and all subkeys being of TID_KEY type
> > 
> > I'm certain that the ODB subtree in question was not accessed concurrently during the test.
> 
> You are right, num_values is always 1 for TID_KEYS. The number of subkeys is stored in 
> 
>   ((KEYLIST *) ((char *)pheader + pkey->data))->num_keys
> 
> Maybe we should add a function to return this. But so far db_enum_key() was enough.
> 
> Stefan

I would rather add a function that atomically returns an std::vector<KEY>. number of entries
is vector size, entry names are in key.name. If you need to do something with an entry,
like iterate a subdirectory, you have to go by name (not by HNDLE), and if somebody deleted
it, you get an error "entry deleted, tough!", (HNDLE becomes invalid without any error message about it, 
subsequent db_get_data() likely returns gibberish, subsequent db_set_data() likely corrupts ODB).

K.O.