 06 Mar 2023, Gennaro Tortone, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
Hi
|
|
06 Mar 2023, Gennaro Tortone, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
Hi Konstantin,
thanks for this update |
|
|
20 Mar 2023, Gennaro Tortone, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
Hi,
I have updated the PR with a new one that includes TimescaleDB support and some
|
|
24 May 2023, Gennaro Tortone, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
Hi,
is there any news regarding this pull request ?
|
|
18 Jul 2023, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
> is there any news regarding this pull request ?
> (https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/pull-requests/30)
|
|
21 Jul 2023, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
> > is there any news regarding this pull request ?
> > (https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/pull-requests/30)
>
|
|
21 Jul 2023, Gennaro Tortone, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
|
|
28 Jul 2023, Stefan Ritt, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
The compilation of midas was broken by the last modification. The reason is that
Pgsql *fPgsql = NULL;
|
|
09 Aug 2023, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, pull request for PostgreSQL support
|
> The compilation of midas was broken by the last modification. The reason is that
> Pgsql *fPgsql = NULL;
> was not protected by #ifdef HAVE_PGSQL
|
 05 Feb 2008, Denis Bilenko, Info, pymidas 0.6.0 released - python bindings for Midas
|
Hi!
I have released pymidas - Python binding to Midas.
|
01 May 2023, Giovanni Mazzitelli, Bug Report, python issue with mathplot lib vs odb query 
|
Ciao,
we have a very strange issue with python lib with client.odb_get("/") function
when running as midas process and matplotlib is used.
|
|
01 May 2023, Ben Smith, Bug Report, python issue with mathplot lib vs odb query
|
> it seams that there is a difference between the to way of use the code, and that
> is sufficient the call to matplotlib to corrupt in some way the odb. any ideas?
|
|
01 May 2023, Giovanni Mazzitelli, Bug Report, python issue with mathplot lib vs odb query
|
> > it seams that there is a difference between the to way of use the code, and that
> > is sufficient the call to matplotlib to corrupt in some way the odb. any ideas?
>
|
|
01 May 2023, Giovanni Mazzitelli, Bug Report, python issue with mathplot lib vs odb query
|
> > it seams that there is a difference between the to way of use the code, and that
> > is sufficient the call to matplotlib to corrupt in some way the odb. any ideas?
>
|
|
01 May 2023, Ben Smith, Bug Report, python issue with mathplot lib vs odb query
|
Looks like a localisation issue. Your floats are formatted as "6,6584e+01", whereas the JSON decoder expects "6.6584e+01".
Can you run the following few lines please? Then I'll be able to write a test using the same setup as you:
|
|
01 May 2023, Ben Smith, Bug Report, python issue with mathplot lib vs odb query
|
> Looks like a localisation issue. Your floats are formatted as "6,6584e+01", whereas the JSON decoder expects "6.6584e+01".
This should be fixed in the latest commit to the midas develop branch. The JSON specification requires a dot for the decimal separator, so we must ignore |
|
01 May 2023, Giovanni Mazzitelli, Bug Report, python issue with mathplot lib vs odb query
|
> > Looks like a localisation issue. Your floats are formatted as "6,6584e+01", whereas the JSON decoder expects "6.6584e+01".
>
> This should be fixed in the latest commit to the midas develop branch. The JSON specification requires a dot for the decimal separator, so we must ignore |
|
26 Dec 2010, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, race condition and deadlock between ODB lock and SYSMSG lock in cm_msg()
|
>
> The only remaining problem when running my script is some kind of deadlock between the ODB and SYSMSG semaphores...
>
|
|
22 Oct 2022, Lars Martin, Suggestion, read_only odbxx?
|
I really like the concept of the odbxx interface.
I think it would be a nice feature if one could have a read_only connection, e.g. by declaring a "const midas::odb".
Just for fun I tried if this already works, but the compiler doesn't allow const midas::odb for e.g. the [] operator. I'm guessing this would be non-trivial |
|
24 Oct 2022, Stefan Ritt, Suggestion, read_only odbxx?
|
> I really like the concept of the odbxx interface.
> I think it would be a nice feature if one could have a read_only connection, e.g. by declaring a "const midas::odb".
> Just for fun I tried if this already works, but the compiler doesn't allow const midas::odb for e.g. the [] operator. I'm guessing this would be non-trivial |