> > it seams that there is a difference between the to way of use the code, and that 
> > is sufficient the call to matplotlib to corrupt in some way the odb. any ideas?
> 
> I can't reproduce this on my machines, so this is going to be fun to debug!
> 
> Can you try running the program below please? It takes the important bits from odb_get() but prints out the string before we try to parse it as JSON. Feel free to send me the output via email (bsmith@triumf.ca) if you don't want to post your entire ODB dump in the elog.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> import sys
> import os
> import time
> import midas
> import midas.client
> import ctypes
> 
> def debug_get(client):
>     c_path = ctypes.create_string_buffer(b"/")
>     hKey = ctypes.c_int()
>     client.lib.c_db_find_key(client.hDB, 0, c_path, ctypes.byref(hKey))
> 
>     buf = ctypes.c_char_p()
>     bufsize = ctypes.c_int()
>     bufend = ctypes.c_int()
> 
>     client.lib.c_db_copy_json_save(client.hDB, hKey, ctypes.byref(buf), ctypes.byref(bufsize), ctypes.byref(bufend))
> 
>     print("-" * 80)
>     print("FULL DUMP")
>     print("-" * 80)
>     print(buf.value)
>     print("-" * 80)
>     print("Chars 17000-18000")
>     print("-" * 80)
>     print(buf.value[17000:18000])
>     print("-" * 80)
> 
>     as_dict = midas.safe_to_json(buf.value, use_ordered_dict=True)
> 
>     client.lib.c_free(buf)
> 
>     return as_dict
> 
> def main(verbose=False):
>     client = midas.client.MidasClient("middleware")
>     buffer_handle = client.open_event_buffer("SYSTEM",None,1000000000)
>     request_id = client.register_event_request(buffer_handle, sampling_type = 2)
> 
>     fpath = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(sys.argv[0]))
> 
>     while True:
>         # odb = client.odb_get("/")
>         odb = debug_get(client)
> 
>         if verbose:
>             print(odb)
>         start1 = time.time()
> 
>         client.communicate(10)
>         time.sleep(1)
> 
> 
>     client.deregister_event_request(buffer_handle, request_id)
> 
>     client.disconnect()
> 
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     main()
Thank you!
if I added the mat

> it seams that there is a difference between the to way of use the code, and that 
> is sufficient the call to matplotlib to corrupt in some way the odb. any ideas?

I can't reproduce this on my machines, so this is going to be fun to debug!

Can you try running the program below please? It takes the important bits from odb_get() but prints out the string before we try to parse it as JSON. Feel free to send me the output via email (bsmith@triumf.ca) if you don't want to post your entire ODB dump in the elog.




import sys
import os
import time
import midas
import midas.client
import ctypes

def debug_get(client):
    c_path = ctypes.create_string_buffer(b"/")
    hKey = ctypes.c_int()
    client.lib.c_db_find_key(client.hDB, 0, c_path, ctypes.byref(hKey))

    buf = ctypes.c_char_p()
    bufsize = ctypes.c_int()
    bufend = ctypes.c_int()

    client.lib.c_db_copy_json_save(client.hDB, hKey, ctypes.byref(buf), ctypes.byref(bufsize), ctypes.byref(bufend))

    print("-" * 80)
    print("FULL DUMP")
    print("-" * 80)
    print(buf.value)
    print("-" * 80)
    print("Chars 17000-18000")
    print("-" * 80)
    print(buf.value[17000:18000])
    print("-" * 80)

    as_dict = midas.safe_to_json(buf.value, use_ordered_dict=True)

    client.lib.c_free(buf)

    return as_dict

def main(verbose=False):
    client = midas.client.MidasClient("middleware")
    buffer_handle = client.open_event_buffer("SYSTEM",None,1000000000)
    request_id = client.register_event_request(buffer_handle, sampling_type = 2)

    fpath = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(sys.argv[0]))

    while True:
        # odb = client.odb_get("/")
        odb = debug_get(client)

        if verbose:
            print(odb)
        start1 = time.time()

        client.communicate(10)
        time.sleep(1)


    client.deregister_event_request(buffer_handle, request_id)

    client.disconnect()

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Ciao, 
we have a very strange issue with python lib with client.odb_get("/") function 
when running as midas process and matplotlib is used.


we are developing a remote console by means of sending via kafka producer the odb, 
camera image and pmt waveforms, in the INFN cloud where grafana make available 
data for non expert shifters, as well as sending midas events for online 
reconstruction to the htcondr queue on cloud. The process work perfectly and allow 
use to parallelise to standard midas pipeline for file production, ecc the online 
monitoring and data processing where we have computing resources (our DAQ is 
underground at LNGS). Part of the work will be presented next weak at CHEP
the full code is available at https://github.com/CYGNUS-
RD/middleware/blob/master/dev/event_producer_s3.py
but to get the strange behaviour I report here a test script:

----
def main(verbose=False):
    from matplotlib import pyplot as plt

    import time

    import midas
    import midas.client

    
    client = midas.client.MidasClient("middleware")
    buffer_handle = client.open_event_buffer("SYSTEM",None,1000000000)
    request_id = client.register_event_request(buffer_handle, sampling_type = 2) 
    
    fpath = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(sys.argv[0]))
    
    
    while True:
        # 
        odb = client.odb_get("/")
        if verbose:
            print(odb)
        start1 = time.time()
              
        client.communicate(10)
        time.sleep(1)
        

    client.deregister_event_request(buffer_handle, request_id)

    client.disconnect()
----
if I run it as cli interactivity including or not matplotlib the everything si ok. 
As I run it as midas "program" I get: 
-----
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/standard/daq/middleware/dev/test_midas_error.py", line 48, in 
<module>
    main(verbose=options.verbose)
  File "/home/standard/daq/middleware/dev/test_midas_error.py", line 29, in main
    odb = client.odb_get("/")
  File "/home/standard/packages/midas/python/midas/client.py", line 354, in 
odb_get
    retval = midas.safe_to_json(buf.value, use_ordered_dict=True)
  File "/home/standard/packages/midas/python/midas/__init__.py", line 552, in 
safe_to_json
    return json.loads(decoded, strict=False, 
object_pairs_hook=collections.OrderedDict)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/json/__init__.py", line 370, in loads
    return cls(**kw).decode(s)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/json/decoder.py", line 337, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/json/decoder.py", line 353, in raw_decode
    obj, end = self.scan_once(s, idx)
json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: 
line 300 column 26 (char 17535)
----
if I comment out the import of matplotlib every think works perfectly again also 
as midas program. 

it seams that there is a difference between the to way of use the code, and that 
is sufficient the call to matplotlib to corrupt in some way the odb. any ideas?

> > > As i said we can easily reproduce this with midas/examples/odbxx/odbxx_test.cpp
> > ok, cool. looks like we crashed the mserver.
> Ok. Maybe i have to make this more clear. ANY odbxx access of a remote odb reproduces this error for us on multiple machines. 
> It does not matter how much data odbxx is asking for.
> midas commit 9d2ef471 the code from above runs fine

so, a regression. ouch.

if core dumps are turned off, you will not "see" the mserver crash, because the main mserver is still running. it's the mserver forked to 
serve your RPC connection that crashes.

> int main() {
>    cm_connect_experiment("localhost", "Mu3e", "test", NULL);
>    midas::odb o = {
>       {"Int32 Key", 42}
>    };
>    o.connect("/Test/Settings");
>    cm_disconnect_experiment();
>    return 1;
> }

to debug this, after cm_connect_experiment() one has to put ::sleep(1000000000); (not that big, obviously),
then while it is sleeping do "ps -efw | grep mserver", this will show the mserver for the test program,
connect to it with gdb, wait for ::sleep() to finish and o.connect() to crash, with luck gdb will show
the crash stack trace in the mserver.

so easy to debug? this is why back in the 1970-ies clever people invented core dumps, only to have
even more clever people in the 2020-ies turn them off and generally make debugging more difficult (attaching
gdb to a running program is also disabled-by-default in some recent linuxes).

rant-off.

to check if core dumps work, to "killall -7 mserver". to enable core dumps on ubuntu, see here:
https://daq00.triumf.ca/DaqWiki/index.php/Ubuntu

last known-working point is:

commit 9d2ef471c4e4a5a325413e972862424549fa1ed5
Author: Ben Smith <bsmith@triumf.ca>
Date:   Wed Jul 13 14:45:28 2022 -0700

    Allow odbxx to handle connecting to "/" (avoid trying to read subkeys as "//Equipment" etc.

K.O.

> > As i said we can easily reproduce this with midas/examples/odbxx/odbxx_test.cpp  (with cm_connect_experiment changed to "localhost")
> > [test,ERROR] [system.cxx:5104:recv_tcp2,ERROR] unexpected connection closure
> > [test,ERROR] [system.cxx:5158:ss_recv_net_command,ERROR] error receiving network command header, see messages
> > [test,ERROR] [midas.cxx:13900:rpc_call,ERROR] routine "db_copy_xml": error, ss_recv_net_command() status 411, program abort
> 
> ok, cool. looks like we crashed the mserver. either run mserver attached to gdb or enable mserver core dump, we need it's stack trace,
> the correct stack trace should be rooted in the handler for db_copy_xml.
> 
> but most likely odbxx is asking for more data than can be returned through the MIDAS RPC.
> 
> what is the ODB key passed to db_copy_xml() and how much data is in ODB at that key? (odbedit "du", right?).
> 
> K.O.

Ok. Maybe i have to make this more clear. ANY odbxx access of a remote odb reproduces this error for us on multiple machines. 
It does not matter how much data odbxx is asking for.

Something as simple as this reproduces the error, asking for a single integer:

int main() {
   cm_connect_experiment("localhost", "Mu3e", "test", NULL);
   midas::odb o = {
      {"Int32 Key", 42}
   };
   o.connect("/Test/Settings");
   cm_disconnect_experiment();
   return 1;
}

at the same time this runs fine:

int main() {
   cm_connect_experiment(NULL, NULL, "test", NULL);
   midas::odb o = {
      {"Int32 Key", 42}
   };
   o.connect("/Test/Settings");
   cm_disconnect_experiment();
   return 1;
}

in both cases mserver does not crash. I do not have a stack trace. There is also no error produced by mserver.

Last year we did not have these problems with the same midas frontends (For example in midas commit 9d2ef471 the code from above runs 
fine). I am trying to pinpoint the exact commit where this stopped working now. 

> As i said we can easily reproduce this with midas/examples/odbxx/odbxx_test.cpp  (with cm_connect_experiment changed to "localhost")
> [test,ERROR] [system.cxx:5104:recv_tcp2,ERROR] unexpected connection closure
> [test,ERROR] [system.cxx:5158:ss_recv_net_command,ERROR] error receiving network command header, see messages
> [test,ERROR] [midas.cxx:13900:rpc_call,ERROR] routine "db_copy_xml": error, ss_recv_net_command() status 411, program abort

ok, cool. looks like we crashed the mserver. either run mserver attached to gdb or enable mserver core dump, we need it's stack trace,
the correct stack trace should be rooted in the handler for db_copy_xml.

but most likely odbxx is asking for more data than can be returned through the MIDAS RPC.

what is the ODB key passed to db_copy_xml() and how much data is in ODB at that key? (odbedit "du", right?).

K.O.

> > Is this maybe related to what Stefan said about the run start - so that odbedit needs some time to load the bigger ODB?
> 
> At the run start mlogger writes the ODB to the .mid file. This needs conversion (binary ODB -> XML ASCII) which can take time.
> This does NOT depend on the ODB size, but on the ODB *content*.
>

Yes and no. They must be storing more than 100 Mbytes of stuff in ODB, if they are asking to bump ODB size from 100 Mbyte to 2 GByte ODB.

On the MIDAS, side, though, we have to plan for the worst case, if max ODB size 1.9 GB and it is full of data,
and mlogger (and odbedit save and load) take 10-30 seconds, then at least all timeouts (watchdog timeout, RPC timeout, etc)
must be increased accordingly.

K.O.

> > Congratulations. created != "it works".
> 
> Two other tings to consider:
> 
> 1) The ODB shared memory is dumped into a binary file (".ODB.SHM") after the last client finished and read if the first client starts, to get it persistent. 
> So this could slow down starting and stopping, but only the first client, so I guess it's not an issue.
>

typical disk writing speed is 100-1000 Mbytes/sec, so writing 1 GB .ODB.SHM will take 1-10 seconds. NFS over 1gige network is 100 Mbytes/sec, so 10 seconds to 
write .ODB.SHM. embedded ARM write speed to SD flash can be as low as 10 Mbytes/sec, so up to 100 seconds.

> 
> 2) Traditionally, the ODB gets dumped to the .mid file at the beginning and end of every run, so that one know the exact configuration of the experiment
> for offline analysis. This can be turned off of course, but most experiments use it. If the ODB is dumped in any ASCII format, this can take quite long.
> Assume it takes 10 seconds at the beginning of each run, and we take a run every five minutes. Then we loose 48 mins of precious beam time every day.
> 

new default is to save as JSON, (as of my last measurement) JSON encoder is faster than the XML (and ODB?) encoder, by default result is compressed by GZIP-1 (66 
Mbytes/sec is my old benchmark, should remeasure on new DDR5 machines), compressed JSON is written .mid.gz file at disk speed (as above). Alternatively, use LZ4 
compression, runs roughly at memcpy() speed, less compression, written to .mid.lz4 at disk speed.

if data storage is ZFS, ZFS built-in LZ4 compression is now enabled by default, so result writing uncompressed .mid file (no compression of ODB dump), should be 
roughly same as when using MIDAS LZ4 compression and writing .mid.lz4.

bottom line, I need to remeasure gzip and lz4 compression speeds on new computers (DDR4 AMD 5000 series and DDR5 AMD 7000 series).

K.O.

> At the run start mlogger writes the ODB to the .mid file. This needs conversion (binary ODB -> XML ASCII) which can take time.
> This does NOT depend on the ODB size, but on the ODB *content*. Every key in the ODB takes time to convert. So if your ODB as 1.5 GB
> but only a few keys, this is still fast. Only if you have 200 million keys int he ODB, then mlogger takes lots of time to convert
> 200 million values to XML or JSON strings.
This was also my assumption. Is this the same for odbedit -c save FILE?
Because this is what I tested with the script and there one can see in the plot that the time increases to write the file if the ODB size increases.
The content of the ODB is always the same - one STRING key in the directory Test.

Best,
Marius

> Is this maybe related to what Stefan said about the run start - so that odbedit needs some time to load the bigger ODB?

At the run start mlogger writes the ODB to the .mid file. This needs conversion (binary ODB -> XML ASCII) which can take time.
This does NOT depend on the ODB size, but on the ODB *content*. Every key in the ODB takes time to convert. So if your ODB as 1.5 GB
but only a few keys, this is still fast. Only if you have 200 million keys int he ODB, then mlogger takes lots of time to convert
200 million values to XML or JSON strings.

Stefan

> my vote is to bump the ODB size limit to 1999*1000*1000 (not quite 2GB). but this needs to be tested. especially save and restore from ODB, XML and JSON files, including how long it takes to save and load a 1.9GB ODB. K.O.

I had some fun with python and created a test script which can be executed in the MIDASSYS/online folder (test_odb.py). I did not really normalize the time so it will be different at different systems but I guess the trend is important (see create_time.pdf).
What is surprising to me is that even that I only write one STRING key to the time increases. Is this maybe related to what Stefan said about the run start - so that odbedit needs some time to load the bigger ODB?
Second thing is that also the creation / storing and load time is increasing. Should this be or is there a bug in the code I use or again is this related to the previous point?

The test of comparing the ODB after store / load / store already fails for the json format. I know I only test if the dicts are the same, so for timestamps this already fails.
But what is strange here is that sometimes the test works sometimes not and its different from run to run.

I will try to improve the test a bit more but for a short update this is how it looks so fare.

Best,
Marius

> Looks like your MIDAS is built without debug information (-O2 -g), the stack trace does not have file names and line numbers. Please rebuild with debug information and report the stack trace. Thanks. K.O.
> 
> > Connect to experiment Mu3e on host 10.32.113.210...
> > OK
> > Init hardware...
> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'mexception'
> >   what():  
> > /home/mu3e/midas/include/odbxx.h:1102: Wrong key type in XML file
> > Stack trace:
> > 1   0x00000000000042D828 (null) + 4380712
> > 2   0x00000000000048ED4D midas::odb::odb_from_xml(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 605
> > 3   0x0000000000004999BD midas::odb::odb(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 317
> > 4   0x000000000000495383 midas::odb::read_key(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 1459
> > 5   0x0000000000004971E3 midas::odb::connect(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, bool, bool) + 259
> > 6   0x000000000000497636 midas::odb::connect(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, bool, bool) + 502
> > 7   0x00000000000049883B midas::odb::connect_and_fix_structure(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) + 171
> > 8   0x0000000000004385EF setup_odb() + 8351
> > 9   0x00000000000043B2E6 frontend_init() + 22
> > 10  0x000000000000433304 main + 1540
> > 11  0x0000007F8C6FE3724D __libc_start_main + 239
> > 12  0x000000000000433F7A _start + 42
> > 
> > Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> K.O.

As i said we can easily reproduce this with midas/examples/odbxx/odbxx_test.cpp  (with cm_connect_experiment changed to "localhost")
Stack trace of odbxx_test with line numbers:

Set ODB key "/Test/Settings/String Array 10[0...9]" = ["","","","","","","","","",""]
Created ODB key "/Test/Settings/Large String Array 10"
Set ODB key "/Test/Settings/Large String Array 10[0...9]" = ["","","","","","","","","",""]
[test,ERROR] [system.cxx:5104:recv_tcp2,ERROR] unexpected connection closure
[test,ERROR] [system.cxx:5158:ss_recv_net_command,ERROR] error receiving network command header, see messages
[test,ERROR] [midas.cxx:13900:rpc_call,ERROR] routine "db_copy_xml": error, ss_recv_net_command() status 411, program abort

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00007ffff6665cdb in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
Missing separate debuginfos, use: zypper install libgcc_s1-debuginfo-11.3.0+git1637-150000.1.9.1.x86_64 libstdc++6-debuginfo-11.2.1+git610-1.3.9.x86_64 libz1-debuginfo-1.2.11-3.24.1.x86_64
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff6665cdb in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007ffff6667375 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x0000000000431bba in rpc_call (routine_id=11249) at /home/labor/midas/src/midas.cxx:13904
#3  0x0000000000460c4e in db_copy_xml (hDB=1, hKey=1009608, buffer=0x7ffff7e9c010 "", buffer_size=0x7fffffffadbc, header=false) at /home/labor/midas/src/odb.cxx:8994
#4  0x000000000046fc4c in midas::odb::odb_from_xml (this=0x7fffffffb3f0, str=...) at /home/labor/midas/src/odbxx.cxx:133
#5  0x000000000040b3d9 in midas::odb::odb (this=0x7fffffffb3f0, str=...) at /home/labor/midas/include/odbxx.h:605
#6  0x000000000040b655 in midas::odb::odb (this=0x7fffffffb3f0, s=0x4a465a "/Test/Settings") at /home/labor/midas/include/odbxx.h:629
#7  0x0000000000407bba in main () at /home/labor/midas/examples/odbxx/odbxx_test.cxx:56
(gdb) 

> Congratulations. created != "it works".

Two other tings to consider:

1) The ODB shared memory is dumped into a binary file (".ODB.SHM") after the last client finished and read if the first client starts, to get it persistent. 
So this could slow down starting and stopping, but only the first client, so I guess it's not an issue.

2) Traditionally, the ODB gets dumped to the .mid file at the beginning and end of every run, so that one know the exact configuration of the experiment
for offline analysis. This can be turned off of course, but most experiments use it. If the ODB is dumped in any ASCII format, this can take quite long.
Assume it takes 10 seconds at the beginning of each run, and we take a run every five minutes. Then we loose 48 mins of precious beam time every day.

Best,
Stefan

my vote is to bump the ODB size limit to 1999*1000*1000 (not quite 2GB). but this needs to be tested. especially save and restore from ODB, XML and JSON files, including how long it takes to save and load a 1.9GB ODB. K.O.

> You said the writing into .odb is buggy. Do you mean it’s buggy in general or only in this specific case?
> We save the ODB most of the time in the .odb format. 

I recommend JSON. Main advantage is you can read it using JSON decoder available for any language, no need to write custom code.

Other than that, the main issue is encoding of strings. For ODB this is key names and string values.

JSON was the first to standardize escape characters what can encode all valid UTF-8 UNICODE strings,
the system of escape characters is clean, easy to understand and easy to implement. https://www.json.org/json-en.html

XML is not as well defined as JSON, i.e. go and try to find the XML BNF grammar. I am not sure if the MIDAS XML encoder
and decoder is fully UTF-8 clean, and if some unlucky combinations of characters break string encoding or decoding. This
is usually tested using a fuzzer (generates all possible, unlucky and unlikely string values). Most suspicious
would be quotes, and square and angle brackets. If some character combinations break encoding or decoding, likely
this cannot be fixed in MIDAS without breaking backwards self-compatibility (will not read old ODB files correctly).

Same applies for the ODB format, except that it is even more ad-hoc. Again, any problems are hard to fix without
breaking backward self-compatibility.

In addition, in the past, the ODB and XML decoders had trouble with very long strings, this has been
fixed some time ago.

K.O.

> This is change is wrong. As I wrote, ODB is not 64-bit clean and it is not 32-bit clean. We think is is 31-bit clean, so maximum size would be slightly less than 2 Gbytes.

I just wanted to show that changing it and creating bigger ODBs is in general possible.

My main intention was to trigger the discussion again. I also think in general 1GB is enough. But for our applications sometimes 100MB is just on the edge. 



> Congratulations. created != "it works". for proper test, you should fill it with 1.5 GB of stuff, save to json file, reload from json file, save to a different json file and compare that they have same contents (minus timestamps).

You’re right we did not properly test it. I will run this test with a 1GB ODB.



> We could spend a lot of time making odb 32-bit clean and give you 4GB-max ODB, but would it be useful? For large ODB, "save to .json" already takes a long time ("save to .xml" is slower, "save to .odb" ditto, also buggy). We already have complaints that runs take forever to start because mlogger 

> takes a long time to write the ODB save file.

I also agree that going in and making it 32-bit or even 64-bit clean is not worth the effort.

Also concerning the writing speed of the logger etc I am fully with you.

However, having the freedom to choose a bit bigger ODB would be great.



You said the writing into .odb is buggy. Do you mean it’s buggy in general or only in this specific case?

We save the ODB most of the time in the .odb format. 



Cheers,

Marius

Looks like your MIDAS is built without debug information (-O2 -g), the stack trace does not have file names and line numbers. Please rebuild with debug information and report the stack trace. Thanks. K.O.

> Connect to experiment Mu3e on host 10.32.113.210...
> OK
> Init hardware...
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'mexception'
>   what():  
> /home/mu3e/midas/include/odbxx.h:1102: Wrong key type in XML file
> Stack trace:
> 1   0x00000000000042D828 (null) + 4380712
> 2   0x00000000000048ED4D midas::odb::odb_from_xml(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 605
> 3   0x0000000000004999BD midas::odb::odb(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 317
> 4   0x000000000000495383 midas::odb::read_key(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 1459
> 5   0x0000000000004971E3 midas::odb::connect(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, bool, bool) + 259
> 6   0x000000000000497636 midas::odb::connect(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, bool, bool) + 502
> 7   0x00000000000049883B midas::odb::connect_and_fix_structure(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) + 171
> 8   0x0000000000004385EF setup_odb() + 8351
> 9   0x00000000000043B2E6 frontend_init() + 22
> 10  0x000000000000433304 main + 1540
> 11  0x0000007F8C6FE3724D __libc_start_main + 239
> 12  0x000000000000433F7A _start + 42
> 
> Aborted (core dumped)

K.O.

> H
> /home/mu3e/midas/include/odbxx.h:1102: Wrong key type in XML file
> Stack trace:
> 1   0x00000000000042D828 (null) + 4380712
> 2   0x00000000000048ED4D midas::odb::odb_from_xml(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 605
> 3   0x0000000000004999BD midas::odb::odb(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 317
> 4   0x000000000000495383 midas::odb::read_key(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) + 1459
> 5   0x0000000000004971E3 midas::odb::connect(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, bool, bool) + 259
> 6   0x000000000000497636 midas::odb::connect(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, bool, bool) + 502
> 7   0x00000000000049883B midas::odb::connect_and_fix_structure(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) + 171
> 8   0x0000000000004385EF setup_odb() + 8351
> 9   0x00000000000043B2E6 frontend_init() + 22
> 10  0x000000000000433304 main + 1540
> 11  0x0000007F8C6FE3724D __libc_start_main + 239
> 12  0x000000000000433F7A _start + 42
> 
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> 
> We have the same problem for all our frontends. When we want to start them locally they work. Starting them locally with ./frontend -h localhost also reproduces the error above.
> 
> The error can also be reproduced with the odbxx_test.cxx example in the midas repo by replacing line 22 in midas/examples/odbxx/odbxx_test.cxx (cm_connect_experiment(NULL, NULL, "test", NULL);) with cm_connect_experiment("localhost", "Mu3e", "test", NULL); (Put the name of the experiment instead of "Mu3e")
> 
> running odbxx_test locally gives us then the same error as our other frontend.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Martin

> > I agree, I think we can safely bump the limit from 100 Mbytes to 1 Gbyte, maybe 1.5 or 
> > 1.99 Gbytes. Above that we run into 32-bit/31-bit cleanliness problems.
>
> We just went in and changed: int odb_size_limit = INT_MAX;//100*1000*1000; in odb.cxx.
>

This is change is wrong. As I wrote, ODB is not 64-bit clean and it is not 32-bit clean. We think is is 31-bit clean, so maximum size would be slightly less than 2 Gbytes.

> And we could create ODBs with 1GB and 1.5 GB.

Congratulations. created != "it works". for proper test, you should fill it with 1.5 GB of stuff, save to json file, reload from json file, save to a different json file and compare that they have same contents (minus timestamps).

We could spend a lot of time making odb 32-bit clean and give you 4GB-max ODB, but would it be useful? For large ODB, "save to .json" already takes a long time ("save to .xml" is slower, "save to .odb" ditto, also buggy). We already have complaints that runs take forever to start because mlogger 
takes a long time to write the ODB save file.

P.S. 64-bit clean ODB will be binary incompatible, all internal pointers are 32-bit right now.

K.O.

Hi all,

> I agree, I think we can safely bump the limit from 100 Mbytes to 1 Gbyte, maybe 1.5 or 
> 1.99 Gbytes. Above that we run into 32-bit/31-bit cleanliness problems.
We just went in and changed: int odb_size_limit = INT_MAX;//100*1000*1000; in odb.cxx. And we could create ODBs with 1GB and 1.5 GB.

Since the DecodeSize function in odbinit has also foreseen yottabytes ;) (const char units[] = {'k', 'M', 'G', 'T', 'P', 'E', 'Z', 'Y'};) we think going to GB for the maximum ODB size would be create.

> there is a bug in odbinit, if initial odbinit fails, ODB with default size is creates, 
> and original rejected ODB size is written to .ODB_SIZE.TXT (an inconsistency).
Can#t we go with the maximum size here if the user inputs a larger size? So just below       printf("Checking ODB size...\n"); one could check for the odb_size_limit. In general one could move the odb_size_limit to midas.h so its not only available in odb.cxx.

Best,
Marius