Back Midas Rome Roody Rootana
  Midas DAQ System, Page 42 of 154  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Topicdown Subject
  1540   05 Jun 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoMIDAS switched to C++
The last bits of code to switch MIDAS to C++ have been committed, see tag midas-2019-05-cxx.

Since the cmake conversion is still in progress, for now, I recommend using the old "make" build for trying this update.

From the switch to C++, the biggest change is the requirement that frontend programs be build and linked
using the C++ compiler. Since mfe.o and the rest of MIDAS are built with C++, building frontends
with C is no longer possible.

To help with this, I will post a short guide for converting C frontends to C++.

K.O.
  1541   05 Jun 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoMIDAS switching to Cmake
Status update on the cmake conversion:

- we have cmake builds working on all supported systems (el6, el7, ubuntu 18.04 LTS, macos 10.13, 10.14)
- I am happy with the result - for example, include file dependancies work much better now
- we are still fixing a few problems where the cmake build is different from the old make build (mfe.o, mlogger/rmlogger, etc)
- until all of these problems are straightened out, we cannot finalize the instructions for writing experiment makefiles (do we have to use -lmfe or 
we can keep the old mfe.o)

After everything is finalized, I hope to post a short guide for converting experiment makefiles to the new system.

The next release of MIDAS (midas-2019-06 series) will be the first C++ midas and cmake will be the primary build system.

K.O.
  1542   05 Jun 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoHow to convert C midas frontends to C++
> To convert a MIDAS frontend to C++ follow this checklist:

Pierre A.-A. reminded me that include files for CAEN libraries have  to
use "extern C" brackets:

some 3rd party libraries (CAEN, etc) are written in C (or require C linkage),
if their include files are not C++ compatible (do not have "extern C" brackets
for all exported symbols), the experiment frontend code must say something like this:

extern "C" {
#include "3rd-party-c-library.h"
}

Note: "#ifdef cplusplus" is not needed because we already know we are C++, not C.

K.O.
  1546   10 Jun 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfostatus of self-signed https certificates
> > > In the mean time, we continue to recommend that mhttpd should be used behind a password protected https proxy (i.e. apache 
> > > httpd, etc).

There we go. google-chrome 74 refuses to connect to mhttpd configured with a self-signed certificate generated per instructions printed by mhttpd.

Here is the full error text (there is no button to "let me connect to it anyway"):

Your connection is not private
Attackers might be trying to steal your information from musr03.triumf.ca (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). Learn more
NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID
 
Help improve Safe Browsing by sending some system information and page content to Google. Privacy policy
musr03.triumf.ca normally uses encryption to protect your information. When Google Chrome tried to connect to musr03.triumf.ca this time, the website sent back unusual and incorrect credentials. This may happen when an 
attacker is trying to pretend to be musr03.triumf.ca, or a Wi-Fi sign-in screen has interrupted the connection. Your information is still secure because Google Chrome stopped the connection before any data was exchanged.

You cannot visit musr03.triumf.ca right now because the website uses HSTS. Network errors and attacks are usually temporary, so this page will probably work later.
  1553   17 Jun 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoMIDAS switching to Cmake
> Status update on the cmake conversion:

It looks like cmake cannot do several things we need for building midas.

- it looks like cmake does not support bare object files as 1st class build targets.

We build at least two bare object files: mfe.o and mana.o for use by frontends and analyzers (and I am about
to add one more for the manalyzer). They all contain main() functions and cannot be in libmidas.a.

Stefan & co managed to kludge cmake to build mfe.o but so far I have been unable to figure out how to tell cmake
to actually use it for linking. Replacing "mfe" for -llibmfe in target_include_libraries() with "mfe.o" yields -llibmfe.o, clearly
they do not support linking to bare library object files.

So to avoid fighting cmake, libmfe.a and libmana.a are here to stay.

- it looks like cmake does not like building variant executables and object files, i.e. "with ROOT" and "without ROOT".

I need to set "-DHAVE_ROOT" for building "with ROOT" and unset it via remove_definitions() for building "without ROOT",
but remove_definitions() and add_definitions() do not work on a per-target basis, instead they operate
per-directory and per-project.

In midas, we build mlogger without ROOT (to avoid tangling it with the ROOT RPATH and ROOT shared libraries),
but if ROOT is present, we build rmlogger "with ROOT support". Same for the analyzer (mana.o and rmana.o).

For now we have this:
- mana.o is built with ROOT if ROOT is detected
- rmana.o is not built
- rmlogger is not built (not clear why)

K.O.
  1557   17 Jun 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoMIDAS switching to Cmake
> > Status update on the cmake conversion:

After the latest updates from Stefan & co, it looks like the cmake builds are working correctly,
there is only one bug remaining (rmlogger is not built). (rmana.o is also not built, but I think only 0 people use it).

I will test this in a couple of our test experiments, write the instructions for migrating from the old midas and tag a new release (midas-2019-06)

K.O.
  1558   17 Jun 2019 Stefan RittInfoMIDAS switching to Cmake
> - it looks like cmake does not like building variant executables and object files, i.e. "with ROOT" and "without ROOT".
> 
> I need to set "-DHAVE_ROOT" for building "with ROOT" and unset it via remove_definitions() for building "without ROOT",
> but remove_definitions() and add_definitions() do not work on a per-target basis, instead they operate
> per-directory and per-project.

You should not use per-directory and per-project definitions, but per-target definitions, such as

target_compile_options(mhttpd PRIVATE -DMG_ENABLE_SSL)

> In midas, we build mlogger without ROOT (to avoid tangling it with the ROOT RPATH and ROOT shared libraries),
> but if ROOT is present, we build rmlogger "with ROOT support". Same for the analyzer (mana.o and rmana.o).
> 
> For now we have this:
> - mana.o is built with ROOT if ROOT is detected
> - rmana.o is not built
> - rmlogger is not built (not clear why)

I added rmlogger to the install instructions. I believe it was always built, but just not installed into the /bin directory.

Stefan
  1562   18 Jun 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoMIDAS switching to Cmake
> target_compile_options(rmlogger PRIVATE -DHAVE_ROOT)

Got it. Now I can build the duplets of mana.o and rmana.o (and .a) - mana always without ROOT, rmana with ROOT if available. This is the same as 
the old Makefile, the best I can tell.

With the fix to rmlogger, all known problems with the cmake build seem to be fixed.

K.O.
  1589   04 Jul 2019 Lukas GerritzenInfoLimitations of MSL
Hi, 
I am missing a few features. Do any of the following exist and I have just
overlooked them?

- Arithmetics:
    SET foo, 2
    SET bar, 2
    SET FOOBAR, $foo + $bar
    -> FOOBAR is 2, not 4

- Vectors/arrays
    As far as I understand, "SET" only allows for single variables and no 
    "scripting" in variable names, i. e. doing something like the following
    scripted: 
    SET var_1, 0
    SET var_2, 0
    ...
    LOOP n, 10
        ...
        IF something
            SET var_${n}, 1
        ENDIF 
    
    The only way I could think of doing something similar is via the ODB.
    I don't know if it's good practice to fill the ODB with variables like this.

- Loading scripts at run time (see other bug)
    That would allow for script manipulation, even though it's kind of dirty, it
    might be useful in some cases.

- Obtaining results from external scripts
    A way to pass things from external scripts would be the solution to all
    problems. Something that is not implemented could be done in a bash or
    python script instead. 

Cheers
Lukas
  1593   05 Jul 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoLimitations of MSL
> I am missing a few features.

MSL did not start out as a fully featured programming language.

Rather than extending it until it becomes one, I think a better approach would be to take
one of the existing extensible scripting language libraries and extend it with midas functions.

For example, LUA (https://www.lua.org/about.html) seems to be popular.

There were also requests for a midas extension for PYTHON (actually this has been done before,
but never added to the midas repository. I still have that code and I suppose it could be resurrected).

K.O.


> Do any of the following exist and I have just
> overlooked them?
> 
> - Arithmetics:
>     SET foo, 2
>     SET bar, 2
>     SET FOOBAR, $foo + $bar
>     -> FOOBAR is 2, not 4
> 
> - Vectors/arrays
>     As far as I understand, "SET" only allows for single variables and no 
>     "scripting" in variable names, i. e. doing something like the following
>     scripted: 
>     SET var_1, 0
>     SET var_2, 0
>     ...
>     LOOP n, 10
>         ...
>         IF something
>             SET var_${n}, 1
>         ENDIF 
>     
>     The only way I could think of doing something similar is via the ODB.
>     I don't know if it's good practice to fill the ODB with variables like this.
> 
> - Loading scripts at run time (see other bug)
>     That would allow for script manipulation, even though it's kind of dirty, it
>     might be useful in some cases.
> 
> - Obtaining results from external scripts
>     A way to pass things from external scripts would be the solution to all
>     problems. Something that is not implemented could be done in a bash or
>     python script instead. 
> 
> Cheers
> Lukas
  1594   08 Jul 2019 Stefan RittInfoLimitations of MSL
Sure some existing scripting languages can be used, but they fall short of a few important items in larger experiments:

- they are typically run from a local terminal in the counting house. A remote observer of the experiment has no idea which script is running and at which state it is.

- if DAQ crashes during a script or is aborted, it has to be restarted from the beginning. If you run a sequence of let's say 100 runs taking 8 hours, and on run #98 something goes wrong, you are screwed if you have to start at run #1 again.

This are the main reasons why I developed the midas sequencer. Having everything web-based, everybody can watch remotely how far the sequence progressed. If the whole DAQ crashes, the sequence resumes from the crash point, not from the beginning. This is by saving the current state into the ODB. So even if the sequencer itself is stopped and restarted, that still works.

I agree that the MSL is missing a few calculations, and I was just waiting to get a few specific requests. I will either add new functions such as basic calculations like adding and subtracting variables, or I will create a way to call an external shell like bash to do calculations. I put this high on my todo list.

Stefan
  1595   08 Jul 2019 Lukas GerritzenInfoLimitations of MSL
Thank you two!

Actually, both solutions would allow me to fix my problem and I can see use cases for both. Having everything web-based is useful in bigger setups. However, in a testbeam environment, a python script is probably the more straight-forward solution. This gives access to the whole system of ones DAQ PC for whatever tricks one would like to perform.

Konstantin, would you mind resurrecting and sharing the python code? So far, my workaround is to call odbedit, which is not ideal for many reasons.

Cheers
Lukas
  1599   08 Jul 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoLimitations of MSL
> Konstantin, would you mind resurrecting and sharing the python code?

Not until September or later.

I encourage you to start an "issue" in the bitbucket repository (a "request for improvement") and contact
Thomas L. to see if we can/should discuss it at the incoming midas workshop at TRIUMF.

> So far, my workaround is to call odbedit, which is not ideal for many reasons.

Yes, this has been the way to do it for years...

Also I was thinking of writing an command line tool to invoke midas json-rpc methods (via mhttpd),
then you can do from command line or from a script everything that a web page can do. (of course
you can do it today, by using "curl" to send http requests to mhttpd directly).

K.O.
  1600   08 Jul 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoLimitations of MSL
Hi, Stefan, on second thought, I agree, I do not know of any scripting language implementation (packaged as a library or not) that
can store it's state in a file ("checkpoint the execution") and that can execute it's program "one line at a time", like the midas
sequencer does now. In the most severe case, one invocation of msequencer executes one line of the msl script.

K.O.

> Sure some existing scripting languages can be used, but they fall short of a few important items in larger experiments:
> 
> - they are typically run from a local terminal in the counting house. A remote observer of the experiment has no idea which script is running and at which state it is.
> 
> - if DAQ crashes during a script or is aborted, it has to be restarted from the beginning. If you run a sequence of let's say 100 runs taking 8 hours, and on run #98 something goes wrong, you are screwed if you have to start at run #1 again.
> 
> This are the main reasons why I developed the midas sequencer. Having everything web-based, everybody can watch remotely how far the sequence progressed. If the whole DAQ crashes, the sequence resumes from the crash point, not from the beginning. This is by saving the current state into the ODB. So even if the sequencer itself is stopped and restarted, that still works.
> 
> I agree that the MSL is missing a few calculations, and I was just waiting to get a few specific requests. I will either add new functions such as basic calculations like adding and subtracting variables, or I will create a way to call an external shell like bash to do calculations. I put this high on my todo list.
> 
> Stefan
  1606   09 Jul 2019 Stefan RittInfoLimitations of MSL
> Yes, this has been the way to do it for years...

Calling odbedit -c ... ist certainly not the most effective way, but it works. I just tried on my Mac and found that I can call odbedit about 150 times per second. So not so bad if you have a limited operations to perform.

Stefan
  1621   16 Jul 2019 Lukas GerritzenInfoLimitations of MSL
Dear Stefan,

another thing which does not work is the comparison of floating point numbers.

The script:

IF 1.1 > 1.0 
    MESSAGE "foo" 
ENDIF 

Produces an error "Invalid number in comparison". This is due to isdigit() being used to find the numerical values in the condition at progs/msequencer.cxx:343.

Would it be possible to add something like the following?
 343 if (!isdigit(value1_var[i]) && value1_var[i] != '.')
 344          break;
Which would only leave open a problem with some string like "2.3.4"

Cheers
Lukas
  1624   21 Jul 2019 Konstantin OlchanskiInfoerror handling is hard
Happy summer to everybody.

When programming in general, and when programming MIDAS, there is always a struggle
with error handling. Too much? Too little? Visually, some MIDAS functions are 90% error handling, 10% useful work, if that.

What is the right way to do this?
Where is the balance?
Would c++ exceptions help or hinder?
How to make it better?

It turns out that the Go community have been struggling with exactly this for the last year or so.

Read the (ultimately rejected) proposal for improved error handling in Go. All the problems and difficulties
and struggles facing the programmer and the language designer spread right in front of us.

https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-error-handling-overview.md

(To remember, Go is this: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/the-go-programming/9780134190570/
The language designers are Brian W. Kernighan, Rob Pike, Ken Thompson and "some other people"
(Dennis Ritchie is no longer with us). These people gave us UNIX and C (and C++, the C++ guy was
their next-door-office mate), when that crowd speaks, I listen)

That write-up refers to some blogger's vivid illustration how correct error handling is hard,
with special focus on error handling in the presence of exceptions:

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/?p=39683
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/?p=36693

I read all this stuff and said, "wow, this is the reader's digest version of my life in computer programming".

The clincher from this last guy? "My point isn’t that exceptions are bad.
My point is that exceptions are too hard and I’m not smart
enough to handle them."

"back to writing some error handling code",
K.O.
  1638   30 Jul 2019 Stefan RittInfoLimitations of MSL
> Would it be possible to add something like the following?
>  343 if (!isdigit(value1_var[i]) && value1_var[i] != '.')
>  344          break;

Actually isdigit() is completely wrong here, because it also fails the minus sign and the 'E' exponent, like in -1.2E-3 

So I changed it to strchr("0123456789.+-Ee", var[i]) which should cover this case. If you put 1.2.3, it takes it as 1.2. 

Stefan
  1640   05 Aug 2019 Stefan RittInfoPrecedence of equipment/common structure
Today I fixed a long-annoying problem. We have in each front-end an equipment structure 
which defined the event id, event type, readout frequency etc. This is mapped to the ODB 
subtree

/Equipment/<name>/Common

In the past, the ODB setting took precedence over the frontend structure. We defined this 
like 25 years ago and I forgot what the exact reason was. It causes however many people 
(including myself) to fall into this trap: You change something in the front-end EQUIPMENT 
structure, you restart the front-end, but the new setting does not take effect since the 
(old) ODB value took precedence. After some debugging you find out that you have to both 
change the EQUIPMENT structure (which defines the default value for a fresh ODB) and the 
ODB value itself.

So I changed it in the current develop tree that the front-end structure takes precedence. 
You still have a hot-link, so if you want to change anything while the front-end is running 
(like the readout period), you can do that in the ODB and it takes effect immediately. But 
when you start the front-end the next time, the value from the EQUIPMENT structure is 
taken again. So please be aware of this new feature.

Happy BC day,
Stefan
  1642   06 Aug 2019 Thomas LindnerInfoPrecedence of equipment/common structure
Hi Stefan,

This change does not sound like a good idea to me.  I think that this change will cause just as much confusion as before; probably more since you are changing established behaviour.

It is common that MIDAS frontends usually have a Settings directory in the ODB where details about the frontend behaviour are set.  The Settings directory might get initialized from strings in the frontend code, but after initialization the Settings in the ODB have precedence and define how the frontend will behave.  Indeed, most of my custom webpages are designed to control my frontend programs through their Settings ODB tree.

So you have created a situation where Frontend/Settings in the ODB has precedence and is the main place for changing frontend behaviour; but Frontend/Common in the ODB is essentially meaningless and will get overwritten the next time the frontend restarts.  That seems likely to confuse people. 

If you really want to make this change I suggest that you delete the Frontend/Common directory entirely; or make it read-only so that people aren't fooled into changing it.

Thomas 



> Today I fixed a long-annoying problem. We have in each front-end an equipment structure 
> which defined the event id, event type, readout frequency etc. This is mapped to the ODB 
> subtree
> 
> /Equipment/<name>/Common
> 
> In the past, the ODB setting took precedence over the frontend structure. We defined this 
> like 25 years ago and I forgot what the exact reason was. It causes however many people 
> (including myself) to fall into this trap: You change something in the front-end EQUIPMENT 
> structure, you restart the front-end, but the new setting does not take effect since the 
> (old) ODB value took precedence. After some debugging you find out that you have to both 
> change the EQUIPMENT structure (which defines the default value for a fresh ODB) and the 
> ODB value itself.
> 
> So I changed it in the current develop tree that the front-end structure takes precedence. 
> You still have a hot-link, so if you want to change anything while the front-end is running 
> (like the readout period), you can do that in the ODB and it takes effect immediately. But 
> when you start the front-end the next time, the value from the EQUIPMENT structure is 
> taken again. So please be aware of this new feature.
> 
> Happy BC day,
> Stefan
ELOG V3.1.4-2e1708b5