10 Mar 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Autostart program
|
Hello everyone,
It seems that if a frontend is started automatically by using Program->Auto start then the status page does not show it as started. This is since the FE |
11 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Autostart program
|
> It seems that if a frontend is started automatically by using Program->Auto start then the status page does not show it as started. This is since the
FE name has a number after the name. If I stop and start manually then the status page shows the correct state of the FE. Am I doing something wrong or
is this a bug somewhere?
|
01 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, xz-utils bomb out, compression benchmarks
|
you may have heard the news of a major problem with the xz-utils project, authors of the popular "xz" file compression,
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3094
|
02 Apr 2024, Zaher Salman, Info, Sequencer editor
|
Dear all,
Stefan and I have been working on improving the sequencer editor to make it look and feel more like a standard editor. This sequencer v2 has been finally
merged into the develop branch earlier today.
|
02 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, Sequencer editor
|
> Stefan and I have been working on improving the sequencer editor ...
Looks grand! Congratulations with getting it completed. The previous version was
|
18 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
I tried to update MIDAS installation on Ubuntu 22.04.1 to the latest commit at
the bitbucket.
|
18 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> [ 34%] Linking CXX executable manalyzer_test.exe
> /usr/bin/ld: /home/astrocent/workspace/root/root_install/lib/libRIO.so: undefined
> reference to
|
19 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
Dear Konstantin,
Thank you for your interest in my problem.
|
19 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
ok, thank you for your information. I cannot reproduce this problem, I use vanilla Ubuntu
LTS 22, ROOT binary kit root_v6.30.02.Linux-ubuntu22.04-x86_64-gcc11.4 from root.cern.ch
and latest midas from git.
|
19 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> ok, thank you for your information. I cannot reproduce this problem, I use vanilla Ubuntu
> LTS 22, ROOT binary kit root_v6.30.02.Linux-ubuntu22.04-x86_64-gcc11.4 from root.cern.ch
> and latest midas from git.
|
28 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
I found solution for my trouble. With MIDAS and ROOT everything is OK,
the trobule was with my Ubuntu enviroment.
|
02 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> I found solution for my trouble. With MIDAS and ROOT everything is OK,
> the trobule was with my Ubuntu enviroment.
|
15 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, open MIDAS RPC ports
|
we had a bit of trouble with open network ports recently and I now think security of MIDAS RPC
ports needs to be tightened.
|
15 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, open MIDAS RPC ports
|
One thing coming to my mind is the interface binding. If you have a midas host with two networks
("global" and "local"=192.168.x.x), you can tell to which interface a socket should bind.
By default it binds both interfaces, but we could restrict the socket only to bind to the local
|
04 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, MIDAS RPC data format
|
I am not sure I have seen this documented before. MIDAS RPC data format.
1) RPC request (from client to mserver), in rpc_call_encode()
|
24 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, MIDAS RPC data format
|
> 4.5) TID_IN32|RPC_VARARRAY does not work, corrupts following parameters. MIDAS only uses TID_ARRAY|RPC_VARARRAY
fixed in commit 0f5436d901a1dfaf6da2b94e2d87f870e3611cf1, TID_ARRAY|RPC_VARARRAY was okey (i.e. db_get_value()), bug happened only if rpc_tid_size()
|
24 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, MIDAS RPC add support for std::string and std::vector<char>
|
I now fully understand the MIDAS RPC code, had to add some debugging printfs,
write some test code (odbedit test_rpc), catch and fix a few bugs.
|
30 Apr 2024, Luigi Vigani, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Good afternoon,
After updating Midas to the latest develop commit
|
29 Apr 2024, Musaab Al-Bakry, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
Hello there,
I am working on a task that involves some ODB changes that happen within 20-500
|
29 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
I guess the simplest way to do that without breaking with existing code is to change the
second number to a float. So a
|
30 Apr 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> I guess the simplest way to do that without breaking with existing code is to change the
> second number to a float. So a
>
|
30 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> This would work fine in principle, but isn't implemented in the current MIDAS sequencer as we understand it. (We tried!) Is your proposal to rewrite
the sequencer
> to allow fractional waits? Right now the code seems to store the start_time as a DWORD and uses atoi to parse the wait time, and uses ss_time (which |
30 Apr 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> > This would work fine in principle, but isn't implemented in the current MIDAS sequencer as we understand it. (We tried!) Is your proposal to rewrite
the sequencer
> > to allow fractional waits? Right now the code seems to store the start_time as a DWORD and uses atoi to parse the wait time, and uses ss_time (which |
30 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
While I will do it, i'm not sure if this is what you want. If I understand correctly, some process gets triggered and then writes some values to the ODB,
then the sequencer
should continue. Putting a wait there is dangerous. Maybe your process always takes like 10-20 ms, so you put a wait of let's say 100ms, and things are |
30 Apr 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> While I will do it, i'm not sure if this is what you want. If I understand correctly, some process gets triggered and then writes some values to the ODB,
then the sequencer
> should continue. Putting a wait there is dangerous. Maybe your process always takes like 10-20 ms, so you put a wait of let's say 100ms, and things are |
02 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
Ok, I implemented the float second wait function. Internally it works in ms, so the maximum resolution is 0.001 s.
Best,
|
02 May 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> Ok, I implemented the float second wait function. Internally it works in ms, so the maximum resolution is 0.001 s.
>
> Best,
|