| ID |
Date |
Author |
Topic |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
1897
|
02 May 2020 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Forum | Taking MIDAS beyond 64 clients | >
> Does the community here have strong opinions
about increasing the
|
|
|
1898
|
02 May 2020 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Forum | Taking MIDAS beyond 64 clients | > >
> > Does the community here have strong opinions
about increasing the
|
|
|
Draft
|
02 May 2020 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Forum | Taking MIDAS beyond 64 clients | > > >
> > > Does the community here have strong
opinions about increasing the |
|
|
1899
|
02 May 2020 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Forum | Taking MIDAS beyond 64 clients | > > >
> > > Does the community here have strong
opinions about increasing the
|
|
|
163
|
13 Oct 2004 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TWIST upgrade bombed... | The upgrade of TWIST to the latest midas has
bombed- we see mevb and mlogger
crashes during shared memory data buffer |
|
|
164
|
13 Oct 2004 |
Pierre-Andre Amaudruz | Bug Report | TWIST upgrade bombed... | > The upgrade of TWIST to the latest midas
has bombed- we see mevb and mlogger
> crashes during shared memory data buffer |
|
|
165
|
13 Oct 2004 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TWIST upgrade bombed... | > The upgrade of TWIST to the latest midas
has bombed- we see mevb and mlogger
> crashes during shared memory data buffer |
|
|
166
|
13 Oct 2004 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TWIST upgrade bombed... | > > The upgrade of TWIST to the latest midas
has bombed- we see mevb and mlogger
> > crashes during shared memory data buffer |
|
|
167
|
14 Oct 2004 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | TWIST upgrade bombed... | Agree.
Once you did the modification, please check |
|
|
169
|
14 Oct 2004 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TWIST upgrade bombed... | > The upgrade of TWIST to the latest midas
has bombed- we see mevb and mlogger
> crashes during shared memory data buffer |
|
|
597
|
24 Jun 2009 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TR_STARTABORT transition, mlogger duplicate event problem | > > > We have seen on several daq systems
this problem: we start a run and observe
that the number of
|
|
|
599
|
25 Jun 2009 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | TR_STARTABORT transition, mlogger duplicate event problem | > Stefan suggested implementing a new transition,
TR_STARTABORT, issued if TR_START fails.
mlogger can use it to cleanup open files, |
|
|
601
|
25 Jun 2009 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | TR_STARTABORT transition, mlogger duplicate event problem | > > Stefan suggested implementing a new transition,
TR_STARTABORT, issued if TR_START fails.
mlogger can use it to cleanup open files, |
|
|
602
|
25 Jun 2009 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | TR_STARTABORT transition, mlogger duplicate event problem | > Are you sure? Only clients that register
themselves to receive the TR_STARTABORT transition
(via cm_register_transition()) will receive |
|
|
883
|
06 May 2013 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Info | TRIUMF MIDAS page moved to DAQWiki | The MIDAS web page at TRIUMF (http://midas.triumf.ca)
moved from the daq-plone site to the DAQWiki
|
|
|
2942
|
12 Feb 2025 |
Mark Grimes | Forum | TMFeRpcHandlerInterface::HandleEndRun when running offline on a Midas file | Hi,
I have a manalyzer that uses a derived class
of TMFeRpcHandlerInterface to communicate |
|
|
2945
|
26 Feb 2025 |
Thomas Lindner | Forum | TMFeRpcHandlerInterface::HandleEndRun when running offline on a Midas file | Hi,
Sorry, we have been slammed with a couple |
|
|
2971
|
20 Mar 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Forum | TMFeRpcHandlerInterface::HandleEndRun when running offline on a Midas file | > I have a manalyzer that uses a derived class
of TMFeRpcHandlerInterface to communicate
information to
|
|
|
2997
|
25 Mar 2025 |
Mark Grimes | Forum | TMFeRpcHandlerInterface::HandleEndRun when running offline on a Midas file | Hi,
The question was about the TMFeRpcHandlerInterface,
not the TARunObject interface. Derived classes |
|
|
3000
|
25 Mar 2025 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Forum | TMFeRpcHandlerInterface::HandleEndRun when running offline on a Midas file | > The question was about the TMFeRpcHandlerInterface,
not the TARunObject interface. Derived classes
of TARunObject do indeed work as expected |
|