I the agdaq system I see memory corruption in the mlogger. There were at least two bugs: one 
memory allocation error in mxml and one incorrect memset() in mlogger.cxx. The mxml bug is fixed 
in the mxml repository, mlogger.cxx bug is fixed in the midas-2017-10 branch.

I suggest that all update mxml to the latest version: (without waiting for the new midas release)
https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/mxml/commits/branch/master

K.O.

multithreaded access to odb was implemented back in 2013-2014. but recently a bug surfaced - 
there was a race condition in the odb locking code against cm_watchdog(). Somehow this only 
affected the mserver for the DRAGON experiment at TRIUMF. This is now fixed on the branch 
feature/midas-2017-10. (this branch collects all the code that needs additional testing before 
merging into develop and becoming the next release of midas).
K.O.

Support for building for ucLinux was added to MIDAS. I use the emcraft toolchain and userland on 
some kind of embedded ARM CPU that does not have an MMU. See the Makefile for details. The 
main difference of ucLinux is lack of fork(), which cannot be done without an MMU. Not everything 
works, but at the least I can run a frontend and connect to an experiment on a remote host 
computer (mserver connection). K.O.

The type INT has been defined in 1989 when I for the first time sent data between a 16-bit MS-DOS computer and a 32-bit VAX computer (good old 
days!). At that time, uint32_t was not available at all. So much for the historical background.

I agree that switching from INT to int32_t is getting closer to standards and might help new people better understand things. This means however to 
touch all midas files and change about 5000 (!) locations:

BYTE -> uint8_t
WORD -> uint16_t
DWORD -> uint32_t
INT -> int32_t

Next we have the midas data types TID_xxx?

The nice thing now is that for example WORD and TID_WORD belong together and this is obvious. For uint16_t and TID_WORD is is not so obvious 
any more, so I guess we should rename TID_WORD to TID_UINT16_t. The same fore 

TID_BYTE -> TID_UINT8_T
TID_SBYTE -> TID_INT8_T
TID_WORD -> TID_UINT16_T
TID_DWORD -> TID_UINT32_T
TID_INT -> TID_INT32_T

But if we changer TID_XXX, the ASCII representations of the ODB break compatibility! Right now we have for example

[/Experiment]
midas http port = INT : 8080

which will become

[/Experiment]
midas http port = INT32_T : 8080

so one cannot load old ODB files any more!

With JSON encoding it's better because only the type number is stored, not the string. So INT -> 7 could stay, although in my opinion encoding the 
type in an integer number is not good for readability. Nobody knows what "7" means as a type. You always have to do a look-up in midas.c and count 
array indices manually.

I'm not sure how many experiments use the ASCII ODB format in one way or the other in some custom scripts. It might be that changing the format 
might have severe side effects for some experiments, so before we undertake this endeavor I would like to get some feedback here on the forum 
about people from other experiments and see what they think.

Stefan

> > if (sizeof(INT) != 4) then severe_error_and_stop_all_programs()
> 
> Quick reply.
> 
> Today, for fixed size data types one should use uint32_t & co, see
> stdint.h
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_data_types#stdint.h
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99 (scroll down and click to open "implementation -> compiler support"
> 
> The other popular convention is "u32" used by the Linux kernel, you will see it in the linux kernel drivers.
> 
> If I remember right, WORD and DWORD grow legs from the 16-bit Motorolla 68xxx processors,
> VxWorks and the VME bus. At some point the data buses were 16-bit wide and that we the WORD.
> 
> (I do not think UNIX ever used the WORD/DWORD names, i.e. MacOS has int32_t and u_int32_t).
> 
> K.O.

> if (sizeof(INT) != 4) then severe_error_and_stop_all_programs()

Quick reply.

Today, for fixed size data types one should use uint32_t & co, see
stdint.h
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_data_types#stdint.h
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99 (scroll down and click to open "implementation -> compiler support"

The other popular convention is "u32" used by the Linux kernel, you will see it in the linux kernel drivers.

If I remember right, WORD and DWORD grow legs from the 16-bit Motorolla 68xxx processors,
VxWorks and the VME bus. At some point the data buses were 16-bit wide and that we the WORD.

(I do not think UNIX ever used the WORD/DWORD names, i.e. MacOS has int32_t and u_int32_t).

K.O.

I agree that the binary compatibility checks are crucial. But I kind of find it strange if one gets an assert failure some where if one tries to change MAX_CLIENTS. It is then not straight 
forward to relate both things and understand the consequences. That's why I put a comment next to the definition of MAX_CLIENTS saying:

/* note that if you change any of the following items, the ODB and the event shared memory buffers 
   become binary incopatible and one has to recompile ALL programs which are locally connected to the 
   ODB and to event buffers */

I think this is more descriptive than just a failing assert. 

If you look carefully in my proposal below, you will see that I rather used

sizeof(INT)

and not 

sizeof(int)

since as KO stated correctly sizeof(int) can change between different architectures. The derived type INT (all uppercase) has been carefully designed to have 32 bits on all architectures. So 
it will NOT change between them. If it does change, then we have a principal problem and many more things will break down. We should therefore have something like

if (sizeof(INT) != 4) then severe_error_and_stop_all_programs()

Now given that sizeof(INT) is everywhere the same, we can use it in the test

sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == NAME_LENGTH + 7*sizeof(INT) + MAX_CLIENTS *(NAME_LENGTH+13*sizeof(INT)+sizeof(float)+2*sizeof(DWORD)+MAX_EVENT_REQUESTS*4*sizeof(INT))

which then basically tests the structure byte alignment and padding. The comment above should warn users to change MAX_CLIENTS without thinking. 

Another strategy would be to put sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) as the first two byes of the structure itself. We can the dynamically test the size of each bm_open_buffer(), and if the local size 
differs from the one saved in the buffer header, the program refuses to start, so we know exactly which program should have to be recompiled. The downside of this would be that the 
header structure has to be changed and we break binary compatibility with all existing programs. But maybe we should do this step once and be safe in the future.

Stefan


> The checks for byte sizes of critical data structures have been added to ensure (enforce) binary compatibility
> of midas with itself on different platforms (32-bit and 64-bit intel, on PPC, on ARM, etc).
> 
> This has worked well in the past and helped avoid problems and subtle bugs in the transition
> from 32-bit to 64-bit machines a few years ago. Of course now 32-bit machines are back
> as ARM CPUs and FPGA synthetic CPUs.
> 
> Replacing the checks with "computed" values will defeat this purpose because the values may be computed
> differently on different machines.
> 
> Specifically as proposed by Stefan, sizeof(int) can change depending on the target machine and depending
> on the compiler settings.
> 
> Of course this needs to be balanced against flexibility to adjust important settings like MAX_CLIENTS and MAX_EVENT_REQUESTS.
> 
> I would say the present system is just fine. You can change MAX_CLIENTS, rebuild MIDAS and it will not run (assert failure) giving
> you an indication that you are doing something non-trivial that will cause problems if you do it without thinking about it.
> 
> For example, one may think nothing of changing midas.h and recompiling MIDAS. But having to change odb.c
> may ring the little bell to tell you that you *also* have to rebuild *all* of your frontends. Even one unrebuilt frontend
> will corrupt all shared memory and crash everything.
> 
> I guess one other way to look at this is as a balance between something a few people do rarely against
> a function that protects everybody all the time.
> 
> That said, I think the checks should be reworked, instead of an assert failure they should give the error message
> and tell the user exactly what number to adjust in the size test. Also some checks are obsolete, there is no longer
> need to check the size of many ODB structures (equipment, etc). Once we are done with the db_get_record() rework,
> only checks for data structures in shared memory shall remain.
> 
> As the bottom line, to change MAX_CLIENTS, you already have to edit midas.h, asking you to also edit odb.c does
> not add much to the burden.
> 
> P.S. We are thinking how to make all these values dynamically changable, but basically it requires rolling out
> a new binary-incompatible version of MIDAS with added bugs. Maybe some day.
> 
> K.O.
> 
> 
> > The sizeof checks were originally invented by KO to check for binary compatibility between processes attached to the same ODB and event buffers. So if a 
> > compiler generates different structure sizes due to different padding, one would see that immediately. I wonder however if the absolute numbers make sense 
> > here. We could replace the 16444 by
> > 
> > NAME_LENGTH + 7*sizeof(INT) + MAX_CLIENTS *(NAME_LENGTH+13*sizeof(INT)+sizeof(float)+2*sizeof(DWORD)+MAX_EVENT_REQUESTS*4*sizeof(INT))
> > 
> > which makes this value automatically scale when one changes MAX_CLIENTS.
> > 
> > People of course have to be aware that if one changes MAX_CLIENTS, then all programs connected to the same ODB or event buffer need to be re-compiled 
> > and the ODB needs to be re-created from an ASCII file, but at least this would avoid tedious manual calculations.
> > 
> > Any opinion?
> > 
> > Stefan
> > 
> > 
> > > Below are the steps we used to increase the maximum number of frontends that we could run.
> > > 
> > > In midas.h
> > > 
> > > #define MAX_CLIENTS            64
> > > 
> > > changed to
> > > 
> > > #define MAX_CLIENTS            128
> > > 
> > > In msystem.h:
> > > 
> > > #define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     64
> > > 
> > > changed to
> > > 
> > > #define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     128
> > > 
> > > In odb.c:
> > > 
> > > assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 16444); 
> > > 
> > > GUESS: 256*64+60 = 16444, so change 64 to 128
> > > 
> > > changed to:                                                                                                                         
> > > 
> > > assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 32828); //256*128+60
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 64*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 64*8256 = 528448
> > > 
> > > changed to:
> > > 
> > > DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 128*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 128*8256 = 1056832.

The checks for byte sizes of critical data structures have been added to ensure (enforce) binary compatibility
of midas with itself on different platforms (32-bit and 64-bit intel, on PPC, on ARM, etc).

This has worked well in the past and helped avoid problems and subtle bugs in the transition
from 32-bit to 64-bit machines a few years ago. Of course now 32-bit machines are back
as ARM CPUs and FPGA synthetic CPUs.

Replacing the checks with "computed" values will defeat this purpose because the values may be computed
differently on different machines.

Specifically as proposed by Stefan, sizeof(int) can change depending on the target machine and depending
on the compiler settings.

Of course this needs to be balanced against flexibility to adjust important settings like MAX_CLIENTS and MAX_EVENT_REQUESTS.

I would say the present system is just fine. You can change MAX_CLIENTS, rebuild MIDAS and it will not run (assert failure) giving
you an indication that you are doing something non-trivial that will cause problems if you do it without thinking about it.

For example, one may think nothing of changing midas.h and recompiling MIDAS. But having to change odb.c
may ring the little bell to tell you that you *also* have to rebuild *all* of your frontends. Even one unrebuilt frontend
will corrupt all shared memory and crash everything.

I guess one other way to look at this is as a balance between something a few people do rarely against
a function that protects everybody all the time.

That said, I think the checks should be reworked, instead of an assert failure they should give the error message
and tell the user exactly what number to adjust in the size test. Also some checks are obsolete, there is no longer
need to check the size of many ODB structures (equipment, etc). Once we are done with the db_get_record() rework,
only checks for data structures in shared memory shall remain.

As the bottom line, to change MAX_CLIENTS, you already have to edit midas.h, asking you to also edit odb.c does
not add much to the burden.

P.S. We are thinking how to make all these values dynamically changable, but basically it requires rolling out
a new binary-incompatible version of MIDAS with added bugs. Maybe some day.

K.O.


> The sizeof checks were originally invented by KO to check for binary compatibility between processes attached to the same ODB and event buffers. So if a 
> compiler generates different structure sizes due to different padding, one would see that immediately. I wonder however if the absolute numbers make sense 
> here. We could replace the 16444 by
> 
> NAME_LENGTH + 7*sizeof(INT) + MAX_CLIENTS *(NAME_LENGTH+13*sizeof(INT)+sizeof(float)+2*sizeof(DWORD)+MAX_EVENT_REQUESTS*4*sizeof(INT))
> 
> which makes this value automatically scale when one changes MAX_CLIENTS.
> 
> People of course have to be aware that if one changes MAX_CLIENTS, then all programs connected to the same ODB or event buffer need to be re-compiled 
> and the ODB needs to be re-created from an ASCII file, but at least this would avoid tedious manual calculations.
> 
> Any opinion?
> 
> Stefan
> 
> 
> > Below are the steps we used to increase the maximum number of frontends that we could run.
> > 
> > In midas.h
> > 
> > #define MAX_CLIENTS            64
> > 
> > changed to
> > 
> > #define MAX_CLIENTS            128
> > 
> > In msystem.h:
> > 
> > #define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     64
> > 
> > changed to
> > 
> > #define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     128
> > 
> > In odb.c:
> > 
> > assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 16444); 
> > 
> > GUESS: 256*64+60 = 16444, so change 64 to 128
> > 
> > changed to:                                                                                                                         
> > 
> > assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 32828); //256*128+60
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 64*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 64*8256 = 528448
> > 
> > changed to:
> > 
> > DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 128*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 128*8256 = 1056832.

The sizeof checks were originally invented by KO to check for binary compatibility between processes attached to the same ODB and event buffers. So if a 
compiler generates different structure sizes due to different padding, one would see that immediately. I wonder however if the absolute numbers make sense 
here. We could replace the 16444 by

NAME_LENGTH + 7*sizeof(INT) + MAX_CLIENTS *(NAME_LENGTH+13*sizeof(INT)+sizeof(float)+2*sizeof(DWORD)+MAX_EVENT_REQUESTS*4*sizeof(INT))

which makes this value automatically scale when one changes MAX_CLIENTS.

People of course have to be aware that if one changes MAX_CLIENTS, then all programs connected to the same ODB or event buffer need to be re-compiled 
and the ODB needs to be re-created from an ASCII file, but at least this would avoid tedious manual calculations.

Any opinion?

Stefan


> Below are the steps we used to increase the maximum number of frontends that we could run.
> 
> In midas.h
> 
> #define MAX_CLIENTS            64
> 
> changed to
> 
> #define MAX_CLIENTS            128
> 
> In msystem.h:
> 
> #define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     64
> 
> changed to
> 
> #define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     128
> 
> In odb.c:
> 
> assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 16444); 
> 
> GUESS: 256*64+60 = 16444, so change 64 to 128
> 
> changed to:                                                                                                                         
> 
> assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 32828); //256*128+60
> 
>  
> 
> DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 64*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 64*8256 = 528448
> 
> changed to:
> 
> DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 128*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 128*8256 = 1056832.

Thanks for documenting this in detail. A few suggestions:

- is it really necessary to call odbedit three times? Maybe two or even three functions can be merged. Like you call odbinit, it checks if the environment is 
there, and creates it automatically if not. Same with the exptab.

- can we make "http redirecto to https = n" and "midas https port = 0" as the default? Of course this has to go with binding to localhost only.

- does it make sense to define default directories for history, data files and midas.log? Maybe we could come with a "default scheme" which can then later 
adjusted if needed.

- will you take care of the wrong logger channel config and history config?

Best regards,
Stefan

> Notes on installing midas from scratch. The instruction on midaswiki will be synced with this later.
> 
> cd ~/packages
> git clone ...
> cd midas
> make
> cd ~
> mkdir ~/online
> cd ~/online
> ~/git/midas/darwin/bin/odbinit --env
> source env.sh
> ~/git/midas/darwin/bin/odbinit --exptab
> ~/git/midas/darwin/bin/odbinit
> ls -la
> send:online olchansk$ ls -la
> total 2376
> drwxr-xr-x   15 olchansk  staff      510 Aug  4 15:34 .
> drwxr-xr-x+ 244 olchansk  staff     8296 Aug  4 15:33 ..
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .ALARM.SHM
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .ELOG.SHM
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .HISTORY.SHM
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .MSG.SHM
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff  1183808 Aug  4 15:34 .ODB.SHM
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        8 Aug  4 15:34 .ODB_SIZE.TXT
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff       15 Aug  4 15:34 .SHM_HOST.TXT
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff       12 Aug  4 15:34 .SHM_TYPE.TXT
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .SYSMSG.SHM
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff      341 Aug  4 15:33 env.csh
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff      322 Aug  4 15:33 env.sh
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff       40 Aug  4 15:34 exptab
> -rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff      287 Aug  4 15:34 midas.log
> send:online olchansk$
> 
> odbedit ### works
> mhttpd ### bombs, requires SSL certificate https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/57/initial-mhttpd-should-bind-to-localhost
> odbedit ### cd /experiment, set "http redirect to https" to no, set "midas https port" to 0
> mhttpd ### runs now
> connect to http://localhost:8080 ### status page works
> restart mhttpd as mhttpd -D
> mlogger -D
> fetest ### runs, prints time and data
> start a run from web page ### works
> ### fetest generates crazy data rate https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/58/fetest-crazy-data-rate
> ### go to history, define plot for SLOW/SLOW, see sine wave ### works
> ### history is written to expt dir, no good, go to "history"
> ### data files written to expt dir, no good, go to "data"
> ### midas.log written to data dir, no good (want expt dir)
> ### elog written to expt dir, go to "elog"
> ### logger channel config is wrong - gzip compression and crc32c should be enabled by default
> ### history config is wrong - FILE per-variable history should be enabled by default
> 
> K.O.
>  

Notes on installing midas from scratch. The instruction on midaswiki will be synced with this later.

cd ~/packages
git clone ...
cd midas
make
cd ~
mkdir ~/online
cd ~/online
~/git/midas/darwin/bin/odbinit --env
source env.sh
~/git/midas/darwin/bin/odbinit --exptab
~/git/midas/darwin/bin/odbinit
ls -la
send:online olchansk$ ls -la
total 2376
drwxr-xr-x   15 olchansk  staff      510 Aug  4 15:34 .
drwxr-xr-x+ 244 olchansk  staff     8296 Aug  4 15:33 ..
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .ALARM.SHM
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .ELOG.SHM
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .HISTORY.SHM
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .MSG.SHM
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff  1183808 Aug  4 15:34 .ODB.SHM
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        8 Aug  4 15:34 .ODB_SIZE.TXT
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff       15 Aug  4 15:34 .SHM_HOST.TXT
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff       12 Aug  4 15:34 .SHM_TYPE.TXT
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff        0 Aug  4 15:34 .SYSMSG.SHM
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff      341 Aug  4 15:33 env.csh
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff      322 Aug  4 15:33 env.sh
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff       40 Aug  4 15:34 exptab
-rw-r--r--    1 olchansk  staff      287 Aug  4 15:34 midas.log
send:online olchansk$

odbedit ### works
mhttpd ### bombs, requires SSL certificate https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/57/initial-mhttpd-should-bind-to-localhost
odbedit ### cd /experiment, set "http redirect to https" to no, set "midas https port" to 0
mhttpd ### runs now
connect to http://localhost:8080 ### status page works
restart mhttpd as mhttpd -D
mlogger -D
fetest ### runs, prints time and data
start a run from web page ### works
### fetest generates crazy data rate https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/58/fetest-crazy-data-rate
### go to history, define plot for SLOW/SLOW, see sine wave ### works
### history is written to expt dir, no good, go to "history"
### data files written to expt dir, no good, go to "data"
### midas.log written to data dir, no good (want expt dir)
### elog written to expt dir, go to "elog"
### logger channel config is wrong - gzip compression and crc32c should be enabled by default
### history config is wrong - FILE per-variable history should be enabled by default

K.O.
 

Below are the steps we used to increase the maximum number of frontends that we could run.

In midas.h

#define MAX_CLIENTS            64

changed to

#define MAX_CLIENTS            128

In msystem.h:

#define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     64

changed to

#define MAX_RPC_CONNECTION     128

In odb.c:

assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 16444); 

GUESS: 256*64+60 = 16444, so change 64 to 128

changed to:                                                                                                                         

assert(sizeof(BUFFER_HEADER) == 32828); //256*128+60

 

DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 64*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 64*8256 = 528448

changed to:

DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 128*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 128*8256 = 1056832.

Hi Folks,

I just realized I never provided the location for the meeting (for those at TRIUMF).  It will be in the ISAC-II conference room.

Cheers,
Thomas

> Dear MIDAS colleagues,
> 
> We will use Zoom for people making remote connections to the MIDAS workshop next week.  The connection details 
> are shown below.  You will need to install a Zoom application, which should happen automatically when clicking on the 
> first link below.  It seemed to work pretty easily for me.
> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>  
> _________________________________________
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> Thomas Lindner is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
> 
> Topic: MIDAS workshop
> Time: Jul 26, 2017 12:30 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
> 
> Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/749477537?pwd=-TSKYSiS0_k
>     Password: midas
> 
> Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll):  +16465588656,,749477537# or +14086380968,,749477537#
> 
> Or Telephone:
>     Dial: +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll) or +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll)
>     Meeting ID: 749 477 537
>     International numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=0Bug-COhDHYndpVqRLnNST9H-uXrauWk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Dear MIDAS users,
> > 
> > We have an approximately final agenda for the MIDAS workshop in two weeks.  The
> > workshop will be on July 26, from 1-6PM (Vancouver time).  The detailed agenda is
> > posted here:
> > 
> > https://indico.triumf.ca/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2342
> > 
> > Next week I will provide details on how to remotely connect to the workshop.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas
> > 
> > PS: as a reminder, the timetable and slides from the last MIDAS workshop can be
> > found here:
> > 
> > https://indico.psi.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=3793#20150715
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Dear MIDAS users,
> > > 
> > > We would like to announce another MIDAS workshop at TRIUMF on July 26, 2017. 
> > > This will be a follow-on to the successful workshop two years ago.  This
> > > workshop will again be during one of Stefan Ritt's visit to TRIUMF.
> > > 
> > > The goal of the workshop would be to have a general discussion on the state of
> > > MIDAS.  We would have presentations from MIDAS developers on new MIDAS features
> > > that are being implemented, with a particular focus on improvements to MIDAS web
> > > functionality and analyzers.  But equally important would be to hear the
> > > experiences of MIDAS users. What aspects of MIDAS work well?  Which aspects need
> > > improving?  What are the major trends in scientific computing that we should
> > > adapt to?  We always appreciate feedback and suggestions from the MIDAS
> > > community (even when we have trouble finding time to make the changes!)
> > > 
> > > We will naturally broadcast the workshop on the web, but it would also be great
> > > if anyone was interested in coming to TRIUMF in person to participate.
> > > 
> > > Thomas, on behalf of MIDAS developers

Dear all,

we are currently undergoing major modifications in the way mhttpd is working. I realized that 
we are now at a state where mhttpd is currently broken, and it will take a few weeks in order to 
get everything converted to the new scheme we plan to use. Therefore I moved the git branch 
"master" to the last known stable version of midas. So for any practical purpose, please do 
NOT update your "develop" branch until further notice. To get the last stable version, you can 
do a 

$ git checkout master

which moves you right before we started to make major modifications. Once we are finished, 
we will announce this here in the forum.

Best regards,
Stefan

Dear MIDAS colleagues,

We will use Zoom for people making remote connections to the MIDAS workshop next week.  The connection details 
are shown below.  You will need to install a Zoom application, which should happen automatically when clicking on the 
first link below.  It seemed to work pretty easily for me.

Cheers,
Thomas
 
_________________________________________

Hi there,

Thomas Lindner is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: MIDAS workshop
Time: Jul 26, 2017 12:30 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/749477537?pwd=-TSKYSiS0_k
    Password: midas

Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll):  +16465588656,,749477537# or +14086380968,,749477537#

Or Telephone:
    Dial: +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll) or +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll)
    Meeting ID: 749 477 537
    International numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=0Bug-COhDHYndpVqRLnNST9H-uXrauWk




> Dear MIDAS users,
> 
> We have an approximately final agenda for the MIDAS workshop in two weeks.  The
> workshop will be on July 26, from 1-6PM (Vancouver time).  The detailed agenda is
> posted here:
> 
> https://indico.triumf.ca/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2342
> 
> Next week I will provide details on how to remotely connect to the workshop.
> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> 
> PS: as a reminder, the timetable and slides from the last MIDAS workshop can be
> found here:
> 
> https://indico.psi.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=3793#20150715
> 
> 
> 
> > Dear MIDAS users,
> > 
> > We would like to announce another MIDAS workshop at TRIUMF on July 26, 2017. 
> > This will be a follow-on to the successful workshop two years ago.  This
> > workshop will again be during one of Stefan Ritt's visit to TRIUMF.
> > 
> > The goal of the workshop would be to have a general discussion on the state of
> > MIDAS.  We would have presentations from MIDAS developers on new MIDAS features
> > that are being implemented, with a particular focus on improvements to MIDAS web
> > functionality and analyzers.  But equally important would be to hear the
> > experiences of MIDAS users. What aspects of MIDAS work well?  Which aspects need
> > improving?  What are the major trends in scientific computing that we should
> > adapt to?  We always appreciate feedback and suggestions from the MIDAS
> > community (even when we have trouble finding time to make the changes!)
> > 
> > We will naturally broadcast the workshop on the web, but it would also be great
> > if anyone was interested in coming to TRIUMF in person to participate.
> > 
> > Thomas, on behalf of MIDAS developers

The mhttpd json-rpc interface now implements batch requests per
http://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#batch

In the nutshell, instead of a single request, one can send a json array of requests and receive a json 
array of replies.

As a variance from the spec, the midas implementation executes the requests strictly in-order and 
the array of replies corresponds exactly to the array of requests (the spec requires user to use the 
"id" field to match replies to requests, in midas json-rpc, the 1st reply is always to the 1st request,
2nd reply is to the 2nd request and so forth).

See this in action look at resources/example.html and in resources/transition.html

K.O.

Dear MIDAS users,

We have an approximately final agenda for the MIDAS workshop in two weeks.  The
workshop will be on July 26, from 1-6PM (Vancouver time).  The detailed agenda is
posted here:

https://indico.triumf.ca/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2342

Next week I will provide details on how to remotely connect to the workshop.

Cheers,
Thomas

PS: as a reminder, the timetable and slides from the last MIDAS workshop can be
found here:

https://indico.psi.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=3793#20150715



> Dear MIDAS users,
> 
> We would like to announce another MIDAS workshop at TRIUMF on July 26, 2017. 
> This will be a follow-on to the successful workshop two years ago.  This
> workshop will again be during one of Stefan Ritt's visit to TRIUMF.
> 
> The goal of the workshop would be to have a general discussion on the state of
> MIDAS.  We would have presentations from MIDAS developers on new MIDAS features
> that are being implemented, with a particular focus on improvements to MIDAS web
> functionality and analyzers.  But equally important would be to hear the
> experiences of MIDAS users. What aspects of MIDAS work well?  Which aspects need
> improving?  What are the major trends in scientific computing that we should
> adapt to?  We always appreciate feedback and suggestions from the MIDAS
> community (even when we have trouble finding time to make the changes!)
> 
> We will naturally broadcast the workshop on the web, but it would also be great
> if anyone was interested in coming to TRIUMF in person to participate.
> 
> Thomas, on behalf of MIDAS developers

To follow up; with some help from Konstantin and Stefan, we realized that this
particular problem should already be fixed.  While I was using the most recent version
of MIDAS, I hadn't rebuild the EPICS frontend programs when I was doing this test.  Once
I did that the error no longer occurred.  This is because the most recent version of
MIDAS includes a check that will resize these particular string variables before using
them (technically, this is included in db_get_record1()); this resizing only happens for
these couple strings that must have a fixed size.

We are still having a separate discussion about whether this treatment of string lengths
that need to have a fixed size can be further improved.  Will update once discussion
converges.


> I guess this might be related to the changes in the last elog conversation; but
> I'll break it out as a separate problem.
> 
> The new mhttpd ODB editor seems to resize all strings (not just strings that are
> greater than 256 characters).  So, when I change some string with the mhttpd ODB
> editor to 'ffffff', then I find that the string size is now ~7 characters.
> 
> This might be fine in general; but it seems to cause a problem when dealing with
> alarms.  In particular, I find that if I try to set (through mhttpd) the
> "execute command" for an alarm class or the "condition" for an alarm, then I get
> into lots of trouble.  For instance, I changed the "execute command" for my
> alarm class through mhttpd; when associated alarms were triggered, I got errors
> 
> 21:58:12 [feSourceEpics,ERROR] [odb.c:9133:db_get_record,ERROR] struct size
> mismatch for "/Alarms/Classes/Alarm" (expected size: 348, size in ODB: 100)
> 21:58:12 [feSourceEpics,ERROR] [alarm.c:379:al_trigger_class,ERROR] Cannot get
> alarm class record
> 
> This makes sense, since ALARM_CLASS has a fixed size
> 
> typedef struct {
>    BOOL write_system_message;
>    ...
>    char execute_command[256];
>    ...
>    char display_fgcolor[32];
> } ALARM_CLASS;
> 
> so problems will clearly occur when I change the size and try to grab it:
> 
>    ALARM_CLASS ac;
>    status = db_get_record1(hDB, hkeyclass, &ac, &size, 0, strcomb(alarm_class_str));
>  
> I guess that similar problems also occur if you edit the string for ALARM or
> PROGRAM_INFO instances.  These problems do not occur when I change my strings
> with odbedit, which doesn't resize strings below 256.
> 
> I'm not sure what the proper solution is.  A temporary solution is that the
> mhttpd ODB editor shouldn't resize strings if the new size is less than 256
> characters; in that case the size should be left as 256 characters.
> 
> This test was done with MIDAS git repository as of today:
> commit 45a90dc329554f528485da121501daf6ecde100d

I guess this might be related to the changes in the last elog conversation; but
I'll break it out as a separate problem.

The new mhttpd ODB editor seems to resize all strings (not just strings that are
greater than 256 characters).  So, when I change some string with the mhttpd ODB
editor to 'ffffff', then I find that the string size is now ~7 characters.

This might be fine in general; but it seems to cause a problem when dealing with
alarms.  In particular, I find that if I try to set (through mhttpd) the
"execute command" for an alarm class or the "condition" for an alarm, then I get
into lots of trouble.  For instance, I changed the "execute command" for my
alarm class through mhttpd; when associated alarms were triggered, I got errors

21:58:12 [feSourceEpics,ERROR] [odb.c:9133:db_get_record,ERROR] struct size
mismatch for "/Alarms/Classes/Alarm" (expected size: 348, size in ODB: 100)
21:58:12 [feSourceEpics,ERROR] [alarm.c:379:al_trigger_class,ERROR] Cannot get
alarm class record

This makes sense, since ALARM_CLASS has a fixed size

typedef struct {
   BOOL write_system_message;
   ...
   char execute_command[256];
   ...
   char display_fgcolor[32];
} ALARM_CLASS;

so problems will clearly occur when I change the size and try to grab it:

   ALARM_CLASS ac;
   status = db_get_record1(hDB, hkeyclass, &ac, &size, 0, strcomb(alarm_class_str));
 
I guess that similar problems also occur if you edit the string for ALARM or
PROGRAM_INFO instances.  These problems do not occur when I change my strings
with odbedit, which doesn't resize strings below 256.

I'm not sure what the proper solution is.  A temporary solution is that the
mhttpd ODB editor shouldn't resize strings if the new size is less than 256
characters; in that case the size should be left as 256 characters.

This test was done with MIDAS git repository as of today:
commit 45a90dc329554f528485da121501daf6ecde100d

Hello,

I am using a CAEN v1720 to digitise signal coming from 5 PMTs and I need to extend the read-
out window to 1ms.

Given the sampling frequency of 250 MHz, each event would consist of about 4.78 MB

Accordingly to the documentation I found in:

https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Event_Buffer

 - I modified the value of ODB /Experiment/MAX_EVENT_SIZE to 8 MB (I overestimated it in case 
I will readout all 8 channels of the v1720)
 - I modified the ODB key /Experiment/Buffer Sizes/SYSTEM to 512 MB (which allow to contain 
about 100 events in the buffer)

The max_event_size in the frontend source code is set to 32 MB while the event_buffer size is 
200 times the max_event_size. So I did not modify those values.

When I start a new run, the MIDAS crash and the ODB gets corrupted:

$ odbedit 
[ODBEdit,ERROR] [odb.c:1134:db_open_database,ERROR] Different database format: Shared 
memory is 262148000, program is 3
[ODBEdit,ERROR] [midas.c:2157:cm_connect_experiment1,ERROR] cannot open database
Unexpected error #326

Do you have any idea of what might be the problem?

The same thing happen if I reduce the buffer size to 128 MB.

The computer running MIDAS has 2 Quad CPU @ 2.83GHz and 4 GB RAM.

Thank you in advance for any help!
Alberto