| ID |
Date |
Author |
Topic |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
306
|
24 Sep 2006 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | mhttpd elog corruption via double-edit | [Quote="K.O.]Aparently the mhttpd elog will
corrupt the elog files if two (or more\?)
elog entries are being edited at the same |
|
|
307
|
27 Sep 2006 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | mhttpd elog corruption via double-edit | [quote="Stefan Ritt"][Quote="K.O.]Aparently
the mhttpd elog will corrupt the
elog files if two (or more\?) elog entries |
|
|
310
|
28 Sep 2006 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | mhttpd elog corruption via double-edit | > I do not know how to "properly" fix this
bug without changing the indexing
> scheme to something similar to what is |
|
|
323
|
21 Jan 2007 |
Denis Bilenko | Bug Report | buffer bugs | Hello,
We've been using midas and have stumbled |
|
|
326
|
22 Jan 2007 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | buffer bugs | [quote="Denis Bilenko"]1. Blocking calls to
midas api aren't usable when client is connected
through mserver. This is true at least for |
|
|
327
|
23 Jan 2007 |
Denis Bilenko | Bug Report | buffer bugs | 1 & 3 - thanks for the fix and the explanation,
as for 2 - I've tried consume and produce
and still has a problem:
|
|
|
328
|
23 Jan 2007 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | buffer bugs | [quote="Denis Bilenko"]1 & 3 - thanks for
the fix and the explanation, as for 2 - I've
tried consume and produce
|
|
|
329
|
24 Jan 2007 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | buffer bugs | I tried again and could [U]not[/U] reproduce
the problem. Last time I was probably confused
by some old mserver.exe executable I had |
|
|
333
|
30 Jan 2007 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | Large files under Windows XP | Hello,
We have problems analyzing large files under |
|
|
334
|
02 Feb 2007 |
Exaos Lee | Bug Report | Compiling failed with SVN3562 under Ubuntu 6.10 | The error log is as the following:
[CODE]
cc -c -g -O2 -Wall -Wuninitialized -Iinclude |
|
|
335
|
02 Feb 2007 |
Exaos Lee | Bug Report | Compiling failed with SVN3562 under Ubuntu 6.10 | I tried to solve the problem by adding a ";".
It was wrong. In fact, the macro "_syscall0(..)"
doesn't need the ";".
|
|
|
337
|
05 Feb 2007 |
Fedor Ignatov | Bug Report | segmentation violation of analyzer on a x86_64 | Hello,
When I connect to analyzer on a x86_64 processor(with |
|
|
338
|
05 Feb 2007 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | wrong version in include/midas.h? | The present .../include/midas.h contains
[alpha@laddvme06 ~/online]$ grep 1.9.5 /home/alpha/packages/midas/include/*
/home/alpha/packages/midas/include/midas.h:#define |
|
|
339
|
06 Feb 2007 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | wrong version in include/midas.h? | > The present .../include/midas.h contains
> [alpha@laddvme06 ~/online]$ grep 1.9.5
/home/alpha/packages/midas/include/*
|
|
|
341
|
06 Feb 2007 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | segmentation violation of analyzer on a x86_64 | > Hello,
>
> When I connect to analyzer on a x86_64 |
|
|
342
|
06 Feb 2007 |
Fedor Ignatov | Bug Report | segmentation violation of analyzer on a x86_64 | Yes right, Problem of a segmentation violation
is solved with this patch. Now it works
fine on x86_64.
|
|
|
345
|
17 Feb 2007 |
Konstantin Olchanski | Bug Report | segmentation violation of analyzer on a x86_64 | > Yes right, Problem of a segmentation violation
is solved with this patch. Now it works
> fine on x86_64.
|
|
|
377
|
22 May 2007 |
Randolf Pohl | Bug Report | analyzer_init called by odb_load | Hi,
I wonder why mana.c:odb_load() calls analyzer_init(). |
|
|
378
|
22 May 2007 |
Stefan Ritt | Bug Report | analyzer_init called by odb_load | The reason to call analyzer_init in odb_load
is the following:
|
|
|
379
|
22 May 2007 |
Randolf Pohl | Bug Report | analyzer_init called by odb_load | Thanks for the quick reply, Stefan.
Please don't change anything in the code |
|