Back Midas Rome Roody Rootana
  Midas DAQ System  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  28 Jan 2024, Pavel Murat, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
    Reply  28 Jan 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
       Reply  28 Jan 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? Screenshot_2024-01-29_at_07.20.50.png
          Reply  29 Jan 2024, Pavel Murat, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
          Reply  29 Jan 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
             Reply  03 Feb 2024, Pavel Murat, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? a.cc
                Reply  08 Feb 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
                   Reply  11 Feb 2024, Pavel Murat, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
                      Reply  13 Feb 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
                         Reply  15 Feb 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
                            Reply  15 Feb 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
                               Reply  15 Feb 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
                                  Reply  19 Feb 2024, Pavel Murat, Forum, number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
Message ID: 2706     Entry time: 11 Feb 2024     In reply to: 2705     Reply to this: 2708
Author: Pavel Murat 
Topic: Forum 
Subject: number of entries in a given ODB subdirectory ? 
> For ODB keys of type TID_KEY, the value num_values IS the number of subkeys. 

this logic makes sense, however it doesn't seem to be consistent with the printout of the test example
at the end of https://daq00.triumf.ca/elog-midas/Midas/240203_095803/a.cc . The printout reports 

key.num_values = 1, but the actual number of subkeys = 6, and all subkeys being of TID_KEY type

I'm certain that the ODB subtree in question was not accessed concurrently during the test.

-- regards, Pasha
ELOG V3.1.4-2e1708b5