Please note that you can also compile midas in the standard cmake way with

$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ cmake ..
$ make install

in the root midas directory. You might have to use "cmake3" on some systems.

Stefan

Since a few people asked me, here is a "minimal" CMakeLists.txt file for a user-written front-end 
program "myfe":

---------------------------

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0)
project(myfe)

# Check for MIDASSYS environment variable
if (NOT DEFINED ENV{MIDASSYS})
   message(SEND_ERROR "MIDASSYS environment variable not defined.")
endif()

set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11)
set(MIDASSYS $ENV{MIDASSYS})

if (${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES Linux)
   set(LIBS -lpthread -lutil -lrt)
endif()

add_executable(myfe myfe.cxx)

target_include_directories(myfe PRIVATE ${MIDASSYS}/include)
target_link_libraries(crfe ${MIDASSYS}/lib/libmfe.a ${MIDASSYS}/lib/libmidas.a ${LIBS})

I updated the documentation for setting up a MYSQL (MariaDB) database for 
recording MIDAS history: https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/History_System#Write_MYSQL-history_events

One thing to note: the "writer" user must have the "INDEX" permission, otherwise 
many things will not work correctly.

Included are the instructions for importing exiting *.hst history files into the 
SQL database: mh2sql --mysql mysql_writer.txt *.hst

Let me know if there is interest in adding support for writing into Postgres SQL 
database. We used to support both MySQL and Postgres through the ODBC library, 
but in the new code, each database has to be supported through it's native API. 
There is code for SQLITE, MYSQL, but no code for Postgres, although it is not too 
hard to add.

K.O.

As the Midas software is installed using CMake, it can be easily integrated into 
other CMake projects using the MidasConfig.cmake file produced during the Midas 
installation.

This file points to the location of the include and libraries of Midas using three 
variables:
- MIDAS_INCLUDE_DIRS
- MIDAS_LIBRARY_DIRS
- MIDAS_LIBRARIES

Then the CMakeLists file of the new project can use the CMake find_package 
functionalities like:
```
find_package (Midas REQUIRED)
if (MIDAS_FOUND)
    MESSAGE(STATUS "Found midas: libraries ${MIDAS_LIBRARIES}")
    pbuilder_add_ext_libraries (${MIDAS_LIBRARIES})
else (MIDAS_FOUND)
    message(FATAL "Unable to find midas")
endif (MIDAS_FOUND)
include_directories (${MIDAS_INCLUDE_DIR})
```
pbuilder_add_ext_libraries is a CMake macro allowing to automatically add the 
libraries into the project: this macro can be found here: 
https://github.com/project8/scarab/blob/master/cmake/PackageBuilder.cmake
If such macro doesn't exist, the linkage to each executable/library can be done 
similarly to https://midas.triumf.ca/elog/Midas/1964 using: 

```
target_link_libraries(crfe ${MIDAS_LIBARIES} ${LIBS})
```

The current version of the MidasConfig.cmake is minimal and could for example 
include a version number: this would allow to define a e.g. minimal version of 
Midas needed by the new project.

Hello!

My name is Soichiro Kuribayashi and I am a Ph.D. student at Kyoto University. 
I'm a T2K collaborator and working for Super FGD which is new detector in ND280.

I'm a beginner of MIDAS and I've just started to develop the DAQ software with 
MIDAS for Super FGD.
For the DAQ of Super FGD, we will run remotely front end part of MIDAS on ZYNQ 
which is system on chip.

For this remote control of front end part with mserver, we have to mount home 
directory of DAQ PC(Cent OS8) on that of Linux on ZYNQ.
So I wonder if we should use NFS(Network file system) + NIS(Network information 
service) + autofs for the mounting. Is it correct?

If you have any information or any suggestion for the remote control on chip, 
please let me know.

Best regards,
Soichiro 

> My name is Soichiro Kuribayashi and I am a Ph.D. student at Kyoto University. 
> I'm a T2K collaborator and working for Super FGD which is new detector in ND280.

Hi! I did much of the DAQ software for the original FGD. I hope I can help.

> For the DAQ of Super FGD, we will run remotely front end part of MIDAS on ZYNQ 
> which is system on chip.

This would be the same as the existing FGD. Inside the FGD DCC is a Virtex4 FPGA
with a 300MHz PPC CPU running Linux from a CompactFlash card (Kentaro-san did this 
part). On this linux system runs the FGD DCC midas frontend. It connects
to the FGD midas instance using the mserver. This frontend executable is
copied to the DCC using "scp", there is no common nfs mounted home directory.

> For this remote control of front end part with mserver, we have to mount home 
> directory of DAQ PC(Cent OS8) on that of Linux on ZYNQ.
> So I wonder if we should use NFS(Network file system) + NIS(Network information 
> service) + autofs for the mounting. Is it correct?

Since you have a bigger SOC and you can run pretty much a complete linux,
I do recommend that you go this route. During development it is very convenient
to have common home directories on the main machine and on the frontend fpga
machines.

But this is not necessary. the midas mserver connection does not require
common (nfs-mounted) home directory, you can copy the files to the frontend
fpga using scp and rsync and you can use the gdb "remote debugger" function.

I can also suggest that on your frontend SOC/FPGA machine, you boot linux
using the "nfs-root" method. This way, the local flash memory only
contains a boot loader (and maybe the linux kernel image, depending on
bootloader limitations). The rest of the linux rootfs can be on your
central development machine. This way management of flash cards,
confusion with different contents of local flash and need to make backups
of frontend machines is much reduced.

If you use a fast SSD and ZFS with deduplication, you will also have good
performance gain (NFS over 1gige network to server with fast SSD works
so much better compared to the very slow SD/MMC/NAND flash).

I can point you to some of my documentation how we do this.

>
> If you have any information or any suggestion for the remote control on chip, 
> please let me know.
> 

I would say you are on a good track. For early development on just one board,
pretty much any way you do it will work, but once you start scaling up
beyound 3-4-5 frontends, you will start seeing benefits from common NFS-mounted
home directories, NFS-root booted linux, etc.

And of course you may want to study the existing ND280/FGD DAQ. I hope you
have access to the running system at Jparc. If not, I have a copy of
pretty much everything (except for running hardware, it is stored in the basement, 
dead) and I can give you access.

P.S. This reminds me that the cascade software from ND280 (they key part
for connecting the FGD, the TPC, the slow controls & etc into one experiment)
was never merged into the midas repository. I opened a ticket for this,
now we will not forget again:

https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/291/import-cascase-frontend-from-t2k-
nd280-fgd

K.O.

Dear Konstantin,

Thank you very much for your reply and detailed information.
I would appreciate if you could help us.

> I can also suggest that on your frontend SOC/FPGA machine, you boot linux
> using the "nfs-root" method. This way, the local flash memory only
> contains a boot loader (and maybe the linux kernel image, depending on
> bootloader limitations). The rest of the linux rootfs can be on your
> central development machine. This way management of flash cards,
> confusion with different contents of local flash and need to make backups
> of frontend machines is much reduced.

As you said, we can run complete Linux (Ubuntu 16) on ZYNQ and I'm using common NFS 
system now. However, I didn't know "nfs-root" method which you mentioned and this method 
seems to be reasonable way to just share linux rootfs.
First of all, I will try this method for simpler system.

> If you use a fast SSD and ZFS with deduplication, you will also have good
> performance gain (NFS over 1gige network to server with fast SSD works
> so much better compared to the very slow SD/MMC/NAND flash).
>
> I can point you to some of my documentation how we do this.

I'm concerned about such performance and I have checked the performance with common NFS 
over gige network and my DAQ PC roughly(data transfer rate ~ O(10) MByte/sec). However, I 
didn't know the ZFS and also how we can have performance gain with a fast SSD and ZFS.
Please let me know your documentation how to do it if possible.

> I would say you are on a good track. For early development on just one board,
> pretty much any way you do it will work, but once you start scaling up
> beyound 3-4-5 frontends, you will start seeing benefits from common NFS-mounted
> home directories, NFS-root booted linux, etc.

I'm developing with just one board and common NFS-mounted now. I'm looking forward to 
seeing such benefits when I will use multiple frontends.
 
> And of course you may want to study the existing ND280/FGD DAQ. I hope you
> have access to the running system at Jparc. If not, I have a copy of
> pretty much everything (except for running hardware, it is stored in the basement, 
> dead) and I can give you access.

I don't have access to the system at Jparc, but Nick has told us where FGD DAQ code is.
Is bellow URL everything of code of FGD DAQ?
https://git.t2k.org/hastings/fgddaq/-/tree/master

Best regards,
Soichiro

We also use a Zynq chip and boot in the following order:

1. SD Card
   a. First Stage Bootloader
   b. PL Firmware
   c. UBOOT
2. NFS over Ethernet
   a. Linux kernel
   b. RootFS
   c. Mounting home directories


If you need details I can bring you in contact with the person who actually implemented that.

Best,
Stefan

Dear Stefan,

Thank you very much for your help.

I have already contacted someone who has used ZYNQ in that order and It's working fine for now.
But, I'll let you know if something goes wrong.

Best regards,
Soichiro 

Today I addressed a topic which bugged me since long time. The ODB contains 
settings under /Equipment/<name>/Common which are a "mirror" of the equipment[] 
setting in a frontend (using the mfe.cxx framework). If the "Common" entry in 
the ODB is not present (fresh experiment), the equipment[] settings from the 
frontend are copied to the ODB. But if it exists, it takes precedence over the 
equipment[] entries, which is wrong in my opinion. Like if you change some 
settings in equipment[] (like the logging period of the history), then recompile 
and restart the frontend, the old values in the ODB are kept and your 
modification in the frontend code has no effect.

Starting on commit c3017c6c on Nov. 17th 2020 I reversed the precedence: Now, on 
each start of the frontend program, the values from equipment[] are written to 
the ODB. They are still "live". If one changes them when the frontend is 
running, that change takes effect immediately. But on the next restart of the 
frontend, the old values from equipment[] is put back there.

I fell too many times into this trap, and I hope the modification helps 
everybody. If there are however experiments which rely on the fact that the 
common settings in the ODB are NOT overwritten by the frontend, please let me 
know and I can put a flag "EQUIPMENT_FE_PRECEDENCE = FALSE" somewhere to restore 
the old behaviour.

Stefan

Indeed this "mirror" of the ODB in settings option can cause frustration in 
particular when we think the ODB is empty but is not.
In the other hand, over time the settings are adjusted to a particular 
configuration or touched or not by the individual run preset parameters. Later, if 
a bug or code correction requires multiple restart of the fe, for every start of 
the application, you loose the latest configuration. This can be frustrating as 
well until you force a post-setting or report the specifics parameters in the fe 
code.
BTW I believe, we originally went for the ODB priority for that specific reason.
 
I would be in favour for having a general flag (FALSE) in /experiment which would 
define this global behaviour.  
PAA

> Today I addressed a topic which bugged me since long time. The ODB contains 
> settings under /Equipment/<name>/Common which are a "mirror" of the equipment[] 
> setting in a frontend (using the mfe.cxx framework). If the "Common" entry in 
> the ODB is not present (fresh experiment), the equipment[] settings from the 
> frontend are copied to the ODB. But if it exists, it takes precedence over the 
> equipment[] entries, which is wrong in my opinion. Like if you change some 
> settings in equipment[] (like the logging period of the history), then recompile 
> and restart the frontend, the old values in the ODB are kept and your 
> modification in the frontend code has no effect.
> 
> Starting on commit c3017c6c on Nov. 17th 2020 I reversed the precedence: Now, on 
> each start of the frontend program, the values from equipment[] are written to 
> the ODB. They are still "live". If one changes them when the frontend is 
> running, that change takes effect immediately. But on the next restart of the 
> frontend, the old values from equipment[] is put back there.
> 
> I fell too many times into this trap, and I hope the modification helps 
> everybody. If there are however experiments which rely on the fact that the 
> common settings in the ODB are NOT overwritten by the frontend, please let me 
> know and I can put a flag "EQUIPMENT_FE_PRECEDENCE = FALSE" somewhere to restore 
> the old behaviour.
> 
> Stefan

> Today I addressed a topic which bugged me since long time.

Right. No easy subject. For me, too, this has been a problem in MIDAS for a long time.

> Now, on each start of the frontend program, the values from equipment[] are written to 
> the ODB. They are still "live". If one changes them when the frontend is 
> running, that change takes effect immediately. But on the next restart of the 
> frontend, the old values from equipment[] is put back there.

There is a downside from this behaviour.

If some values in equipment/common are "live" and the user is expected to change them,
the user will be unpleasantly surprised when their changes magically disappear (after reboot,
after frontend crash, after run restart if experiment requires restarting some frontends
before starting a new run).

This change will also break some experiments that rely in things like specifying
event buffer names through ODB. But experiments can adapt and specify buffer names
through command line switch instead of ODB.

This new way also it makes the "live" Common/Period unusable. Sure I can speed up or slow
down a frontend even during the run, but if my change does not "stick", what good is it?

Personally, I think there is no easy solution for all these troubles.

I would advocate the following approach:

- think of MIDAS as a "mature" system,
- treasure backward compatibility
- (if we must break backward compatibility to introduce a new "must have" improvement, so be it)
- document how things work. if it is clearly written down what different fields in "common" do, fewer people 
"get burned" by unexpected or illogical things. (and any non-trivial system has plenty of those).

Going back to ODB equipment/common, my experience with midas and odb tells me
that one should avoid mixing together ODB entries set by user and ODB entries set by code.

For example, separating them as equipment/settings and equipment/variables works well. Mixing
them as in equipment/common and sequencer/state causes trouble.

So perhaps we should split Equipment/common into two pieces, user settable fields like
"Period" and "event buffer name" would move to equipment/settings or whatever.

This will open the discussion of which items in equipment/common should be user settable,
and some people would want event buffer specified in the code to prevail, while other
people would want the name from odb to prevail, and both are valid but conflicting preferences.

Or we could bite the bullet and say, equipment/common is controlled by the frontend code,
the user should not change it. (and mark it read-only in ODB).

For all the pain this may cause, at least this will make it self-consistent.

Per this proposal, in addition to Stefan's change, the hotlink on equipment/common goes away,
"period" is no longer "live" and the whole subdirectory is made "read-only".

K.O.

Ok, so what about the following proposal:

- I change back the mfe.cxx code to behave like before (ODB has precedence and does not get overwritten when the 
front-end restarts)

- I add a global flag

BOOL equipment_common_overwrite;

and pre-set it to FALSE;

- So if nothing is changed the flag stays false and ODB keeps precedence

- If a frontend wants to overwrite equipment/common on each start, the user sets

BOOL equipment_common_overwrite = TRUE;

near the equipment[] structure in the front-end code. 

- If the flag is true, the mfe.cxx init code copies the equipment[] structure to the ODB on each frontend start

I believe this way we can keep backward compatibility, and add the new way with minimal effort. The only downside 
is that all frontends on this plane have to add at least "BOOL equipment_common_overwrite = FALSE;" in their 
code.

I know global variables are evil, but this way the user can just add the line above to the equipment[] array, so 
one sees this when one edits the equipment[] array, giving motivation to change as needed. So the code would be



BOOL equipment_common_overwrite = TRUE;

EQUIPMENT equipment[] = {
 ....
}



An alternative way would be to add a function

  set_equipment_common_overwrite(TRUE);

into the frontend_init() code. That's somehow cleaner (still needs an internal global variable), but it has to go 
into frontend_init() so won't be at the same place as the EQUIPMENT list in the frontend.

Thoughts?

Best,
Stefan

Yes, I think this will work.

For old mfe.c frontends, global variable set to "do it the new way" should be okey,
new experiments will have it the new way. Old experiments, will be forced to add a one-line definition
of this global variable (otherwise mfe.o will not link), at that time they get to chose "new way" or "old way".

For the new TMFE c++ frontend, this will work naturally when they create the Equipment Common object,
in the object constructor, you can see how it explicitly honors or overwrites the ODB common entries.

The TMFE frontend does not do a live "period", so there should be no issue with that.

Should I open a bitbucket issue "update TMFE frontend to new Equipment/Common scheme", to make sure
I do not forget about it?

K.O.

Ok, I implemented it the following way:

- Added a boolean flag "equipment_common_overwrite", which must be contained in EACH frontend, preferably just 
before the EQUIPMENT structure, such as:

BOOL equipment_common_overwrite = TRUE;

EQUIPMENT equipment[] = {
...
};

- If that flag is TRUE, then the contents of the "equipment" structure is copied to the ODB on each start of the 
front-end

- If the flag is FALSE, then the ODB values are kept on the start of the front-end

The setting of the flag depends now on the philosophy of the experiment. Some experiments say that everything 
needed should be in the front-end code, so when it starts everything gets set correctly. They don't change the 
values in the ODB, but in the frontend code, which then goes into their repository. Other experiments just need 
some default values from the frontend code, and the fine-tune things by changing values in the ODB. These 
experiments should set this flag to FALSE.

*****

Please note that EVERY frontend now needs this flag, so all of you have to add it to all of your front-ends, 
otherwise the front-end will not compile! I could not figure out how to this could be done without this 
requirement, since you can define a global variable only once.

*****


Stefan

One more change: 

After using the new code for some hours, we realized that the "enabled" flag should not come from the frontend code, 
but always be defined by the ODB. So if you quickly have to disable some equipment because the associated hardware is 
off, you want to change this flag only in the ODB and not have to recompile the frontend. So we exclude that flag from 
being set by the frontend. It is anyhow special, because one sees all disable equipment in the main midas status page, 
so one knows what's on and what's off.

Please comment here if you think that change causes problem. Anyhow it's working now for the enabled flag as before 
all these changes.

Stefan

> One more change: 
> 
> After using the new code for some hours, we realized that the "enabled" flag should not come from the frontend code, 
> but always be defined by the ODB. So if you quickly have to disable some equipment because the associated hardware is 
> off, you want to change this flag only in the ODB and not have to recompile the frontend. So we exclude that flag from 
> being set by the frontend. It is anyhow special, because one sees all disable equipment in the main midas status page, 
> so one knows what's on and what's off.
> 
> Please comment here if you think that change causes problem. Anyhow it's working now for the enabled flag as before 
> all these changes.
> 

Good catch. I still think this is fundamentally impossible to "get right". But good, you
are now in the same boat with me. The documentation will read: "if flag is TRUE, these data fields
are read from ODB, if flag is FALSE, those other fields are read from ODB". I will have to check
how this will work out for the TMFE C++ frontend (I think both mfe.c and TMFE frontends should
work "the same").

I think we have at least one month to play with this, I do not think we can do the next release
of midas until January.

K.O.

As you may know, I am a big fan of two software projects - the linux kernel and ROOT. The linux kernel is one of 
the few software projects "done right". ROOT is where normal people try to "get it right" with real-world level 
of success. I use both softwares daily and I try to apply their ways and methods to MIDAS as much as I can.

So just in time for our discussion of array indexes, a talk by gregkh shows
up on slashdot. The title is "how to keep your users happy". (Nobody
ever wants to be nasty to their users, but do read his talk).

https://git.sr.ht/~gregkh/presentation-application_summit/tree/main/keep_users_happy.pdf

The talk refers to some older stuff, still relevant, of course, in case you miss the links
in the pdf file, here they are:

https://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-03-30.html
https://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-04-01.html
https://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ols-2003-keynote/img0.html (click on "continue" to see next page)

K.O.

Hi all,

I am currently trying to recover my corrupted ODB using odbinit and I am still 
getting issues after doing 'odbinit --cleanup' and trying to reload the saved 
ODB (last.json). Here is the output:


************************************************
(odbinit cleanup) Note* the ERROR in system.cxx
************************************************


[caendaq@cu332 ANIS]$ odbinit --cleanup
Checking environment... experiment name is "ANIS", remote hostname is ""
Checking command line... experiment "ANIS", cleanup 1, dry_run 0, create_exptab                                
0, create_env 0
Checking MIDASSYS....../home/caendaq/packages/midas
Checking exptab... experiments defined in exptab file "/home/caendaq/ANIS/exptab                               
":
0: "ANIS" <-- selected experiment
 

Checking exptab... selected experiment "ANIS", experiment directory "/home/caend                               
aq/ANIS/"
 

Checking experiment directory "/home/caendaq/ANIS/"
Found existing ODB save file: "/home/caendaq/ANIS/.ODB.SHM"
 

Checking shared memory...
Deleting old ODB shared memory...
[system.cxx:1052:ss_shm_delete,ERROR] shm_unlink(/1001_ANIS_ODB__home_caendaq_AN                               
IS_) errno 2 (No such file or directory)
Good: no ODB shared memory
Deleting old ODB semaphore...
Deleting old ODB semaphore... create status 1, delete status 1
Preserving old ODB save file /home/caendaq/ANIS/.ODB.SHM" to "/home/caendaq/ANIS                               
/.ODB.SHM.1609951022"
 

Checking ODB size...
Requested ODB size is 0 bytes (0.00B)
ODB size file is "/home/caendaq/ANIS//.ODB_SIZE.TXT"
Saved ODB size from "/home/caendaq/ANIS//.ODB_SIZE.TXT" is 1048576 bytes (1.05MB                               
)
We will initialize ODB for experiment "ANIS" on host "" with size 1048576 bytes                                
(1.05MB)

 
Creating ODB...
Creating ODB... db_open_database() status 302
Saving ODB...
Saving ODB... db_close_database() status 1
Connecting to experiment...
 

Connected to ODB for experiment "ANIS" on host "" with size 1048576 bytes (1.05M                               
B)
Checking experiment name... status 1, found "ANIS"
Disconnecting from experiment...
 

Done
 

****************************************
(Loading the last copy of my ODB)
*************************************



[caendaq@cu332 data]$ odbedit
[local:ANIS:S]/>load last.json
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
[ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
11:38:12 [ODBEdit,INFO] Reloading RPC hosts access control list via hotlink 
callback
 


**********************************************
(Now trying to run my frontend and analyzer)
*********************************************
 


[caendaq@cu332 ANIS]$ ./start_daq.sh

mlogger: no process found
fevme: no process found
manalyzer.exe: no process found
manalyzer_example_cxx.exe: no process found
roody: no process found
[ODBEdit,ERROR] [midas.cxx:6616:bm_open_buffer,ERROR] Buffer "SYSTEM" is 
corrupted, mismatch of buffer name in shared memory ""
 

11:38:30 [ODBEdit,ERROR] [midas.cxx:6616:bm_open_buffer,ERROR] Buffer "SYSTEM" 
is corrupted, mismatch of buffer name in shared memory ""
Becoming a daemon...
Becoming a daemon...
Please point your web browser to http://localhost:8081
To look at live histograms, run: roody -Hlocalhost
Or run: mozilla http://localhost:8081
[caendaq@cu332 ANIS]$ Frontend name          :     fevme
Event buffer size      :     1048576
User max event size    :     204800
User max frag. size    :     1048576
# of events per buffer :     5
 

Connect to experiment ANIS...

OK

[fevme,ERROR] [midas.cxx:6616:bm_open_buffer,ERROR] Buffer "SYSTEM" is 
corrupted, mismatch of buffer name in shared memory ""
[fevme,ERROR] [mfe.cxx:596:register_equipment,ERROR] Cannot open event buffer 
"SYSTEM" size 33554432, bm_open_buffer() status 219

Has anyone ever encountered these issues?

Thanks for your time.

Isaac

A warning, in case others have the same problem I had.

In the past you could configure mhttpd so that the 'Elog' button would redirect to an external ELOG server; to do this you only needed to create and set the ODB variable '/Elog/URL' to the URL of your external ELOG server.

But with the newer MIDAS you need to set two ODB variables:

* "/Elog/URL" needs to be set to the URL of the external ELOG.
* "/Elog/External Elog" needs to be set to 'y'

I hadn't noticed this and was confused why my Elog button wasn't working after upgrading MIDAS.

MIDAS documentation was updated to reflect this change:

https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Electronic_Logbook_(ELOG)