 14 Jul 2004, Exaos Lee, , install problem of Makefile on MacOS X (Darwin 7.4.0, gcc 3.3)
|
There are not such a file "io.h" inside my MacOS X. In fact, I didn't find any file containing function iopl().
So what is the equivalent function of iopl() under MacOS X? The utility dio should be modified in order to be compiled under Darwin-
gcc platform. |
|
14 Jul 2004, Konstantin Olchanski, , install problem of Makefile on MacOS X (Darwin 7.4.0, gcc 3.3)
|
> There are not such a file "io.h" inside my MacOS X. In fact, I didn't find any file containing function iopl().
> So what is the equivalent function of iopl() under MacOS X? The utility dio should be modified in order to be compiled under Darwin-
> gcc platform.
|
 23 Apr 2026, Pavel Murat, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
Dear MIDAS experts,
when I attempted to increase the max number of hotlinks in ODB , defined as
|
23 Apr 2026, Nick Hastings, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB 
|
> Dear MIDAS experts,
>
> when I attempted to increase the max number of hotlinks in ODB , defined as
|
|
24 Apr 2026, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
> when I attempted to increase the max number of hotlinks in ODB , defined as
> #define MAX_OPEN_RECORDS 256 /**< number of open DB records */
> assert(sizeof(DATABASE_CLIENT) == 2112);
|
|
25 Apr 2026, Pavel Murat, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
I see - thank you for the explanation!
Indeed, updating MIDAS clients on each and every RPI etc in a running experiment may be a real challenge.
|
|
27 Apr 2026, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
I wonder why one needs more than 256 hotlinks at all. Please note that with the odbxx "watch" API, you can hotline a whole subdirectory, and get notified
if ANY of the
underlying values or subdirectories change. In principle, one could have one hotlink to "/" and see all changes in the ODB (although that does not make |
|
27 Apr 2026, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
> Indeed, updating MIDAS clients on each and every RPI etc in a running experiment may be a real challenge.
actually, only local clients must be rebuilt, remote clients connecting to the mserver do not care about ODB
|
|
27 Apr 2026, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
> I wonder why one needs more than 256 hotlinks at all.
I confirm that ALPHA is running with MAX_OPEN_RECORDS changed from 256 to 2048,
|
|
27 Apr 2026, Nick Hastings, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
For the record, the ND280 (T2K near detector) MIDAS GSC was initially set up
with MAX_OPEN_RECORDS = 2560 and MAX_CLIENTS = 128.
|
|
27 Apr 2026, Pavel Murat, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
> I wonder why one needs more than 256 hotlinks at all. Please note that with the odbxx "watch" API, you can hotline a whole subdirectory, and get notified
if ANY of the
> underlying values or subdirectories change. In principle, one could have one hotlink to "/" and see all changes in the ODB (although that does not make |
|
27 Apr 2026, Pavel Murat, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
> > I wonder why one needs more than 256 hotlinks at all.
>
> I confirm that ALPHA is running with MAX_OPEN_RECORDS changed from 256 to 2048,
|
|
27 Apr 2026, Pavel Murat, Bug Report, increasing the max number of hot links in ODB
|
> > Indeed, updating MIDAS clients on each and every RPI etc in a running experiment may be a real challenge.
>
> actually, only local clients must be rebuilt, remote clients connecting to the mserver do not care about ODB
|
|
15 Feb 2017, NguyenMinhTruong, Bug Report, increase event buffer size
|
Dear all,
I have problem in event buffer size.
|
|
15 Feb 2017, NguyenMinhTruong, Bug Report, increase event buffer size
|
Dear all,
I have problem in event buffer size.
|
|
16 Feb 2017, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, increase event buffer size
|
> I have problem in event buffer size.
>
> When run MIDAS, I got error "total event size (1307072) larger than buffer size
|
|
20 Feb 2017, NguyenMinhTruong, Bug Report, increase event buffer size
|
I am sorry for my late reply memory in my PC is 16 GB I check the contents of .SHM_TYPE.TXT and it is "POSIXv2_SHM". But there is no buffer
sizes in "/Experiment" After run "ipcrm -M 0x4d040761 size0x204a3c", remove .SYSTEM.SHM and run MIDAS again, I still get error "Shared
memory segment with key 0x4d040761 already exists, please remove it manually: ipcrm -M 0x4d040761 size0x204a3c" M.T |
|
20 Feb 2017, NguyenMinhTruong, Bug Report, increase event buffer size
|
I am sorry for my late reply
memory in my PC is 16 GB
|
|
20 Feb 2017, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, increase event buffer size
|
> memory in my PC is 16 GB
You can safely go to buffer size 100 Mbytes or more.
|
|
20 Feb 2017, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, increase event buffer size
|
> memory in my PC is 16 GB
You can safely go to buffer size 100 Mbytes or more.
|