 20 Mar 2025, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, switch midas to next c++
|
> time to choose the next c++!
Ununtu-24.04, MIDAS builds with -std=c++23 without errors or any additional warnings. (but does it work? "make
|
|
22 Sep 2025, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, switch midas to next c++
|
As part of discussions with Stefan during the MIDAS workshop,
an update to supported versions of c++ on different platforms.
|
 22 Sep 2025, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, switch midas to c++17
|
Following discussions at the MIDAS workshop, we propose to move MIDAS from c++11 to c++17. There is
many new features and we want to start using some of them.
|
|
23 Sep 2025, Pavel Murat, Info, switch midas to c++17
|
perhaps c++20? - std::format is an immediately useful feature. --regards, Pasha
> Following discussions at the MIDAS workshop, we propose to move MIDAS from c++11 to c++17. There is
|
|
23 Sep 2025, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, switch midas to c++17
|
> perhaps c++20? - std::format is an immediately useful feature. --regards, Pasha
confirmed. std::format is an improvement over K&R C printf().
|
|
23 Sep 2025, Pavel Murat, Info, switch midas to c++17
|
> > perhaps c++20? - std::format is an immediately useful feature. --regards, Pasha
>
> confirmed. std::format is an improvement over K&R C printf().
|
|
10 Feb 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Suggestion, switch midas to c++ threads?
|
Hi, Stefan & co - now that midas is c++11 and c++11 comes with a threads library, should we
switch midas to use the c++11 threads instead of pthreads? (Of course on Linux c++11
threads are a layer on top of pthreads, the best I know).
|
|
11 Feb 2020, Stefan Ritt, Suggestion, switch midas to c++ threads?
|
I'm thinking of this already since some time, and it was part of my motivation switching to C++11.
I was delighted to see that what we do in system.c (encapsulate system functions such as threads
and shared memory) is now done natively in C++11, and it's done by experts and not amateurs like us.
|
|
11 Feb 2020, Berta Beltran, Suggestion, switch midas to c++ threads?
|
> Hi, Stefan & co - now that midas is c++11 and c++11 comes with a threads library, should we
> switch midas to use the c++11 threads instead of pthreads? (Of course on Linux c++11
> threads are a layer on top of pthreads, the best I know).
|
|
23 Mar 2006, Sergio Ballestrero, Info, svn@savannah.psi.ch down ?
|
Hi,
I was trying to update the checkout of Midas, but it looks like something is not
working - maybe a component of the Savannah system:
|
|
26 Mar 2006, Stefan Ritt, Info, svn@savannah.psi.ch down ?
|
> Hi,
> I was trying to update the checkout of Midas, but it looks like something is not
> working - maybe a component of the Savannah system:
|
|
27 Mar 2006, Sergio Ballestrero, Info, svn@savannah.psi.ch down ?
|
> I just tried now and it seemed to work fine. Do you still have the problem?
>
> - Stefan
|
|
11 Feb 2007, Konstantin Olchanski, Info, svn and "make indent" trashed my svn checkout tree...
|
Fuming, fuming, fuming.
The combination of "make indent" and "svn update" completely trashed my work copy of midas. Half of
|
|
26 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, support for mbedtls - get an open ssl error while trying to compile Midas
|
> >
> > .../c++ ... /opt/local/lib/libssl.dylib
> >
|
|
26 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, support for mbedtls - get an open ssl error while trying to compile Midas
|
> ... support for certbot
The certbot tool to use instead of certbot is this: https://github.com/ndilieto/uacme
|
|
28 Jan 2020, Berta Beltran, Bug Report, support for mbedtls - get an open ssl error while trying to compile Midas
|
> > ... support for certbot
>
> The certbot tool to use instead of certbot is this: https://github.com/ndilieto/uacme
|
|
02 Feb 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, support for mbedtls - get an open ssl error while trying to compile Midas
|
> I only work on this project from Tuesday to Thursdays.
No problem. No hurry.
|
|
24 Jul 2025, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Fix, support for large history files
|
FILE history code (mhf_*.dat files) did not support reading history files bigger than about 2GB, this is now
fixed on branch "feature/history_off64_t" (in final testing, to be merged ASAP).
|
|
25 Nov 2009, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Fix, subrun file size
|
Please be aware of mlogger.c update rev 4566 on Sept 23rd 2009, when Stefan
fixed a buglet in the subrun file size computations. Before this fix, the first
subrun could be of a short length. If you use subruns, please update your
|
|
24 Sep 2020, Gennaro Tortone, Forum, subrun
|
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a "mechanism" to run an executable
|