> I'm not able to find documentation what is purpose of the RPC? Could someone give any indicators how I can start debug this behavior? Or there is some documentation about the RPC?

The RPC system allows midas clients to issue commands to each other. In the case of the VX2740 code we use it so the midas webserver (mhttpd) can tell the frontend to perform some actions when a user clicks a button on a webpage.

I've been writing most of the code for the VX2740 for Darkside, so will contact you directly to help debug the issue.

> it seams that there is a difference between the to way of use the code, and that 
> is sufficient the call to matplotlib to corrupt in some way the odb. any ideas?

I can't reproduce this on my machines, so this is going to be fun to debug!

Can you try running the program below please? It takes the important bits from odb_get() but prints out the string before we try to parse it as JSON. Feel free to send me the output via email (bsmith@triumf.ca) if you don't want to post your entire ODB dump in the elog.




import sys
import os
import time
import midas
import midas.client
import ctypes

def debug_get(client):
    c_path = ctypes.create_string_buffer(b"/")
    hKey = ctypes.c_int()
    client.lib.c_db_find_key(client.hDB, 0, c_path, ctypes.byref(hKey))

    buf = ctypes.c_char_p()
    bufsize = ctypes.c_int()
    bufend = ctypes.c_int()

    client.lib.c_db_copy_json_save(client.hDB, hKey, ctypes.byref(buf), ctypes.byref(bufsize), ctypes.byref(bufend))

    print("-" * 80)
    print("FULL DUMP")
    print("-" * 80)
    print(buf.value)
    print("-" * 80)
    print("Chars 17000-18000")
    print("-" * 80)
    print(buf.value[17000:18000])
    print("-" * 80)

    as_dict = midas.safe_to_json(buf.value, use_ordered_dict=True)

    client.lib.c_free(buf)

    return as_dict

def main(verbose=False):
    client = midas.client.MidasClient("middleware")
    buffer_handle = client.open_event_buffer("SYSTEM",None,1000000000)
    request_id = client.register_event_request(buffer_handle, sampling_type = 2)

    fpath = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(sys.argv[0]))

    while True:
        # odb = client.odb_get("/")
        odb = debug_get(client)

        if verbose:
            print(odb)
        start1 = time.time()

        client.communicate(10)
        time.sleep(1)


    client.deregister_event_request(buffer_handle, request_id)

    client.disconnect()

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Looks like a localisation issue. Your floats are formatted as "6,6584e+01", whereas the JSON decoder expects "6.6584e+01".

Can you run the following few lines please? Then I'll be able to write a test using the same setup as you:


import locale
print(locale.getlocale())
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
print(locale.getlocale())
 

> Looks like a localisation issue. Your floats are formatted as "6,6584e+01", whereas the JSON decoder expects "6.6584e+01".

This should be fixed in the latest commit to the midas develop branch. The JSON specification requires a dot for the decimal separator, so we must ignore the user's locale when formatting floats/doubles for JSON.

I've tested the fix on my machine by manually changing the locale, and also added an automated test in the python directory.

> The event builder fails to initiate the 10th run since its startup, 
> 'BM_NO_MEMORY: too many requests,'

Hi Kou,

It sounds like you might be calling bm_request_event() when starting a run, but not calling bm_delete_request() when the run stops. So you end up "leaking" event requests and eventually reach the limit of 10 open requests.

In examples/eventbuilder/mevb.c the request deletion happens in source_unbooking(), which is called as part of the "run stopping" logic. I've just updated the midas repository so the example compiles correctly, and was able to start/stop 15 runs without crashing.

Can you check the end-of-run logic in your version to ensure you're calling bm_delete_request()?

Thanks for the bug report Gennaro! 

I've fixed the code so that we'll now find the end-of-run ODB dump even if the user is already at the end of the file when they call get_eor_odb_dump().

Ben

> I wonder if there is a non-intrusive way to have an external (wrt MIDAS)*SQL database 
> serving as a primary source of the run number information for a MIDAS-based DAQ system? 
> - like a plugin with a getNextRunNumber() function, for example, or a special client?

One of my experiments has special rules for run numbering as well. I created a client that registers a begin-of-run transition handler with sequence 1 (so it's the first client to handle the begin-of-run transition). That client updates "/Runinfo/Run number" in the ODB. 

This mostly works. mlogger will create .mid files based on the new run number, the ODB dumps within those files show the new run number etc.

But there are 2 quirks. Let's say your client changed the number from 11 to 400. The message log will say "Run #11 started" and "Run #400 stopped". And the history system will record the start/stop times the same way. That only matters for when you're viewing history plots on the webpage and zoom in far enough to see the run transitions (represented by green and red vertical dashed lines) - the green line will be labelled 11 and the red line 400.

Depending on the exact logic you need, you may be able to avoid these quirks by also recomputing the run number before the user even tries to start a run (e.g. after the end of the previous run, or when the user changes an important setting in the ODB). If you're changing the run number between runs, make sure to set it to "desired number - 1", as midas will increment the run number automatically before handling the next start run request.

We have an experiment that's been running for a long time and has some ODB keys that haven't been touched in ages. Mostly related to features that we don't use like the elog and lazylogger, or things that don't change often (like the logger data directory).

When we start any program, we now got dozens of error messages in the log with lines like:
hkey 297088, path "/Elog/Display run number", invalid pkey->last_written time 1377040124

That timestamp is reasonable though, as the experiment was set up in 2013!

What's the best way to make these messages go away? 
- Change the logic in db_validate_and_repair_key_wlocked() to not worry if keys are 10+ years old? 
- Write a script to "touch" all the old keys so they've been modified recently?
- Something else?

> The symptoms are consistent with a string --> int64 conversion not happening 
> where it is needed. 

Thanks for the report Pasha. Indeed I was missing a conversion in one place. Fixed now!

Ben

> What limits the rate that poll_func is called in a python frontend? 

First the general advice: if you reduce the "period" of your equipment, then your function will get called more frequently. You can set it to 0 and we'll call it as often as possible. You can set this in the ODB at "/Equipment/Python Data Simulator/Common/Period"

If that's still not fast enough, then you can return a *list* of events from your readout_func. I've seen real-world cases of 25kHz+ of midas events generated in this fashion.


However in your case the limitation is likely that you're sending 1.25MB per event and we have a lot of data marshalling to do between the python and C++ layer. In particular it takes 15ms on my machine to just pack the data into a memory buffer (see timeit command below). I am sure there must be a faster way to do this packing, especially in the case where the bank contains a numpy array rather than a python list.

I'll add it to my to-do list to investigate improving the performance of medium-to-large events in the python code.


Cheers,
Ben


P.S. You may have a bug in your calculations (depending on how you did your testing). In poll_func I think you should be updating the stats every time the function is called, not just the times when you return True.


P.P.S. Command I used to test how slow it is to pack the data. One-time setup of creating the buffers, then multiple tests of the pack_into function:

python -m timeit -s "import struct;import ctypes;arr = [0]*1250001;buf = ctypes.create_string_buffer(10000000);fmt = \">1250000d\"" "struct.pack_into(fmt, buf, *arr)"
20 loops, best of 5: 15.3 msec per loop

> in your case the limitation is likely that you're sending 1.25MB per event and we have a lot of data marshalling to do between the python and C++ layer.
> 
> I'll add it to my to-do list to investigate improving the performance of medium-to-large events in the python code.

I've now added better support for numpy arrays in the python code that encodes a `midas.event.Event` object. If you use the "correct" numpy data type then you can get vastly improved performance as numpy already stores the data in memory in the format that we need.

In your example, if you change
        self.zero_buffer = [0] * self.total_data_size
to 
        self.zero_buffer = np.ndarray(self.total_data_size, np.int16)

then the max data rate of the frontend goes from 330MB/s to 7600MB/s on my laptop (a factor 20 improvement from one line of code!) 

To ensure you're using the optimal numpy dtype for your bank, you can reference a dict called `midas.tid_np_formats`. For example `midas.tid_np_formats[midas.TID_SHORT]` is equivalent to `np.int16`. If you use an int16 array and write it as a TID_SHORT bank, then we'll use the fast path. If there is a mismatch, we'll have to do type conversions and will end up on the slow path.

> We're trying to install the SuperCDMS version of MIDAS on a Rocky 9.4 Virtual 
> Machine and are getting a persistent error when we run mserver.  As far as I 
> know there are minimal changes between this and the MIDAS branch, but Ben Smith 
> may have more to say on this.

For reference, "the SuperCDMS version of MIDAS" is just a fork that no longer has any meaningful differences vs the main MIDAS repo, but we only pull updates infrequently after testing a bunch. We last pulled from the develop branch in November 2023. But that should be irrelevant here as semaphore code hasn't been touched for a very long time.

We're running Alma 9.4 on a machine at TRIUMF and the same version of midas works fine there (Amy, you may already have access to scdms-zeus). I believe Alma and Rocky should be basically identical for this.

So the questions are:
* Have you tried other midas programs, or only mserver? E.g. did odbedit and mhttpd work?
* If other programs work, have you been running them all as the same user? In particular, if you ran one program as root and another as an unprivileged user, then you will likely get odd permissions issues.
* What do you see if you run `ls -l /dev/shm` and `ls -l ~/packages/SuperCDMS_DAQ/MidasDAQ/online/.*SHM`? (Or wherever your online dir is for the 2nd one).
* Did you follow the full instructions for recovering from a corrupt ODB? https://daq00.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/FAQ#How_to_recover_from_a_corrupted_ODB   In particular the bit about running odbinit with the --cleanup flag?

> I'm using MIDAS javascript interface (mjsonrpc) to communicate with a frontend from a custom web page 
> and observe that the if the frontend's response exceeds certain number of bytes, it is always truncated. 
> 
> MIDAS C/C++ RPC interface allows users to specify the max response length :
> 
> https://daq00.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Remote_Procedure_Calls_(RPC)#C++_2
> 
> How would one do the same from with mjsonrpc ? 

I just documented the max_reply_length (javascript) and max_len (python) parameters on that page. Both are optional and default to 1024 bytes.

I also added a link to the full mjsonrpc schema https://daq00.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Mjsonrpc#Schema_(List_of_all_RPC_methods) . You can also find the auto-generated schema on any midas installation by going to the "Help" webpage served by mhttpd and clicking the "JSON-RPC schema" > "text table format" link.

> Valid events are:
> Enter event name:
> 
> was printed out, which signified that no events were found. No errors were displayed.

I can't reproduce this. I made a brand new experiment, started mlogger/mhttpd/fetest, then ran the same program. I get:

```
$ python basic_hist_script.py
Valid events are:
* Run transitions
* test_slow/data
Enter event name: 
```

Are you sure you ran the python program after running mlogger and not before? Can you try again after restarting mlogger? And can you verify that your python is connecting to the correct experiment if you have multiple experiments defined?

I tested with python 3.12.8 and 3.13.1, and am on MacOS 14.5, but I can't imagine those differences matter.

The python interface is a trivial wrapper around the C++ function, so the only python-specific thing that would result in an empty list is extracting an integer from a ctypes reference. If that's broken in your version then I don't think any of the midas python code would be working.

Unfortunately I again cannot reproduce this:

$ python ~/DAQ/midas_latest/python/examples/basic_hist_script.py
Valid events are:
* Run transitions
* test_slow/data
Enter event name: test_slow/data
Valid tags for test_slow/data are:
* data
Enter tag name: data
Event/tag test_slow/data/data has 1 elements
How many hours: 1
Interval in seconds: 1
78 entries found
2025/03/17 17:00:56 => 98.097391
2025/03/17 17:00:57 => 98.982151
2025/03/17 17:00:58 => 99.589187
2025/03/17 17:00:59 => 99.926821
2025/03/17 17:01:00 => 99.989878
2025/03/17 17:01:01 => 99.778216
2025/03/17 17:01:02 => 99.292485
.......


I want to narrow down whether the issue is in the basic_hist_script.py or the lower-level code. So there are a few steps of debugging to do.



1) Run code directly in the python interpreter: 

Can you run the following and send the output please?

```
import midas.client
c = midas.client.MidasClient("history_test")
data = c.hist_get_recent_data(1,1,"test_slow/data","data")
print(f"event_name='{data[0]['event_name']}', tag_name='{data[0]['tag_name']}', num_entries={data[0]['num_entries']}, status={data[0]['status']}, arrlen={len(data[0]['values'])}")
```

For me, I get:
event_name='test_slow/data', tag_name='data', num_entries=441, status=1, arrlen=441



2) If things look sensible for you (status=1, non-zero num_entries), then the problem is in the basic_hist_script.py. Can you add the same print() statement in basic_hist_script.py immediately after the call to hist_get_recent_data(), then run that script again and send the output of that?



3) Debug the python/C conversions.

In midas/client.py add the following line to hist_get_data() immediately before the call to self.lib.c_hs_read():

```
        print(f"c_start_time={c_start_time.value}, c_end_time={c_end_time.value}, c_interval={c_interval.value}, c_event_name={c_event_name.value}, c_tag_name={c_tag_name.value}")
```

Then run the following and send the output:

```
import midas.client
c = midas.client.MidasClient("history_test")
data = c.hist_get_recent_data(1,1,"test_slow/data","data")
```

For me, I get:
c_start_time=1742254428, c_end_time=1742258028, c_interval=1, c_event_name=b'test_slow/data', c_tag_name=b'data'

I want to check that the UNIX timestamps match what you expect for your server, and that nothing weird is going on with the python/C string conversions.


Thanks,
Ben

Hi,

I have just installed Midas and set-up the ODB for a SuperCDMS test-facility (on
a SL6.7 machine). All works fine except that I receive the following error message:

[mserver,ERROR] [odb.c:944:db_validate_db,ERROR] Warning: database data area is
100% full

Which is puzzling for the following reason:

-> I have created the ODB with: odbedit -s 4194304
-> Checking the size of the .ODB.SHM it says: 4.2M
-> When I save the ODB as .xml and check the file's size it says: 1.1M
-> When I start odbedit and check the memory usage issuing 'mem', it says: 
...
Free Key area: 1982136 bytes out of 2097152 bytes
...
Free Data area: 2020072 bytes out of 2097152 bytes
Free: 1982136 (94.5%) keylist, 2020072 (96.3%) data

So it seems like nearly all memory is still free. As a test I created more
instances of one of our front-ends and checked 'mem' again. As expected the free
memory was decreasing. I did this ten times in fact, reaching

...
Free Key area: 1440976 bytes out of 2097152 bytes
...
Free Data area: 1861264 bytes out of 2097152 bytes
Free: 1440976 (68.7%) keylist, 1861264 (88.8%) data

So I could use another >20% of the database data area, which is according to the
error message 100% (resp. >95%) full. Am I misunderstanding the error message?
I'd appreciate any comments or ideas on that subject!

Thanks, Belina

I am having difficulty getting the custom scripts to work within the updated MIDAS. Before the 
update I was using something like : 

<input type=submit name=customscript value="test">

on my custom page to run a script under /CustomScript/test, however, with the update to 
MIDAS this is no longer working. I can't find any information about this functionality being 
updated in the latest version - has this changed? Or should it still work? 

Thanks,
Becky (g-2 DAQ)