 15 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, EPICS frontend does not compile under midas-2019-09-i
|
I fixed the compiler errors in epics_ca.cxx, can you try again? (see https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/commits/)
But, I do not see errors with ca_create_channel() and ca_create_subscription().
|
|
15 Jan 2020, Peter Kunz, Forum, EPICS frontend does not compile under midas-2019-09-i
|
Hi Konstantin,
I have EPICS Base Release 3.14.8.2 and got your example running with it, though I had to make one change.
For some reason it wouldn't find libca.so, but when I linked the static library libca.a instead, it worked.
|
|
15 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, EPICS frontend does not compile under midas-2019-09-i
|
> I have EPICS Base Release 3.14.8.2 and got your example running with it...
Ok, good.
|
|
15 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, EPICS frontend does not compile under midas-2019-09-i
|
>
> > I have EPICS Base Release 3.14.8.2 ...
>
|
|
16 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, cmake complie issues, Fedora 31 ROOT?
|
> Complile including ROOT throws an error with ROOT 6.18/04 on Fedora 31 ...
> /usr/include/root/ROOT/RStringView.hxx:32:37: error: ‘experimental’ in namespace ‘std’ ...
|
|
17 Jan 2020, Lukas Gerritzen, Forum, cmake complie issues, Fedora 31 ROOT?
|
> In any case, we are setup for an eventual collision between MIDAS CFLAGS (-std=gnu++11) and ROOT CFLAGS (-std=something else).
Are there good reasons to not compile MIDAS with set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)? So far this was an easier "fix" for me than to recompile ROOT with c++11. |
|
17 Jan 2020, Stefan Ritt, Forum, cmake complie issues, Fedora 31 ROOT?
|
> > In any case, we are setup for an eventual collision between MIDAS CFLAGS (-std=gnu++11) and ROOT CFLAGS (-std=something else).
>
> Are there good reasons to not compile MIDAS with set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)? So far this was an easier "fix" for me than to recompile ROOT with c++11.
|
|
17 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, cmake complie issues, Fedora 31 ROOT?
|
> > In any case, we are setup for an eventual collision between MIDAS CFLAGS (-std=gnu++11) and ROOT CFLAGS (-std=something else).
>
> Are there good reasons to not compile MIDAS with set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)? So far this was an easier "fix" for me than to recompile ROOT with c++11.
|
|
17 Jan 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, cmake complie issues, Fedora 31 ROOT?
|
> > In any case, we are setup for an eventual collision between MIDAS CFLAGS (-std=gnu++11) and ROOT CFLAGS (-std=something else).
>
> Are there good reasons to not compile MIDAS with set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)? So far this was an easier "fix" for me than to recompile ROOT with c++11.
|
 12 Feb 2020, Marius Koeppel, Forum, Difference between "Event Data Size" and "All Bank Size"
|
Dear all,
we are trying to build Midas events on FPGAs and send them directly to the midas
|
|
12 Feb 2020, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Difference between "Event Data Size" and "All Bank Size"
|
Thanks for pointing out this error. The "All Bank Size" contains the size of all banks including their
bank headers, but NOT the global bank header itself. I modified the documentation accordingly.
|
|
13 Feb 2020, Marius Koeppel, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
Dear all,
we creating Midas events directly inside a FPGA and send them off via DMA into the PC RAM. For reading out this RAM via Midas the FPGA sends as a pointer |
|
13 Feb 2020, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
The rb_xxx functions are (thoroughly tested) robust against high data rate given that you use them as intended:
1) Once you create the ring buffer via rb_create(), specify the maximum event size (midas event, not bank size!). Later there is not protection any more, |
|
13 Feb 2020, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
The rb_xxx function are (thoroughly tested!) robust against high data rate given that you use them as intended:
1) Once you create the ring buffer via rb_create(), specify the maximum event size (overall event size, not bank size!). Later there is no protection any |
|
14 Feb 2020, Konrad Briggl, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
Hello Stefan,
is there a difference for the later data processing (after writing the ring buffer blocks)
if we write single events or multiple in one rb_get_wp - memcopy - rb_increment_wp cycle?
|
|
14 Feb 2020, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
rb_xxx functions are midas event agnostic. The receiving side in mfe.cxx (lines 1418 in receive_trigger_event) however pulls one event at a time. If you
have some inconsistency I would put some debugging code there.
|
|
20 Feb 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
> rb_xxx functions are midas event agnostic. The receiving side in mfe.cxx (lines 1418 in receive_trigger_event) however pulls one event at a time. If you
> have some inconsistency I would put some debugging code there.
|
|
20 Feb 2020, Konstantin Olchanski, Forum, Difference between "Event Data Size" and "All Bank Size"
|
> Thanks for pointing out this error. The "All Bank Size" contains the size of all banks including their
> bank headers, but NOT the global bank header itself. I modified the documentation accordingly.
>
|
|
20 Feb 2020, Marius Koeppel, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
We also agree and found the problem now. Since we build everything (MIDAS Event Header, Bank Header, Banks etc.) in the FPGA we had some struggle with
the MIDAS data format (http://lmu.web.psi.ch/docu/manuals/bulk_manuals/software/midas195/html/AppendixA.html). We thought that only the MIDAS Event needs |
|
20 Feb 2020, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Writting Midas Events via FPGAs
|
Actually the cause of all of the is a real bug in the midas functions. We want each bank 8-byte aligned, so there is code in bk_close like:
midas.cxx:14788:
|