 29 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
I guess the simplest way to do that without breaking with existing code is to change the
second number to a float. So a
|
|
30 Apr 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> I guess the simplest way to do that without breaking with existing code is to change the
> second number to a float. So a
>
|
|
30 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> This would work fine in principle, but isn't implemented in the current MIDAS sequencer as we understand it. (We tried!) Is your proposal to rewrite
the sequencer
> to allow fractional waits? Right now the code seems to store the start_time as a DWORD and uses atoi to parse the wait time, and uses ss_time (which |
|
30 Apr 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> > This would work fine in principle, but isn't implemented in the current MIDAS sequencer as we understand it. (We tried!) Is your proposal to rewrite
the sequencer
> > to allow fractional waits? Right now the code seems to store the start_time as a DWORD and uses atoi to parse the wait time, and uses ss_time (which |
|
30 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
While I will do it, i'm not sure if this is what you want. If I understand correctly, some process gets triggered and then writes some values to the ODB,
then the sequencer
should continue. Putting a wait there is dangerous. Maybe your process always takes like 10-20 ms, so you put a wait of let's say 100ms, and things are |
|
30 Apr 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> While I will do it, i'm not sure if this is what you want. If I understand correctly, some process gets triggered and then writes some values to the ODB,
then the sequencer
> should continue. Putting a wait there is dangerous. Maybe your process always takes like 10-20 ms, so you put a wait of let's say 100ms, and things are |
|
02 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
Ok, I implemented the float second wait function. Internally it works in ms, so the maximum resolution is 0.001 s.
Best,
|
|
02 May 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> Ok, I implemented the float second wait function. Internally it works in ms, so the maximum resolution is 0.001 s.
>
> Best,
|
|
05 May 2024, Musaab Al-Bakry, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> > Ok, I implemented the float second wait function. Internally it works in ms, so the maximum resolution is 0.001 s.
> >
> > Best,
|
|
06 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
Indeed there was a sleep(100ms) in the sequencer in each loop. I reduced it now to 10ms. I need at least 10ms since otherwise
the sequencer would run in an infinite loop during the wait and burn 100% CPU. The smallest time slice on Linux to sleep is
10ms, so that's why I set it to that. Give it a try.
|
|
06 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
Actually I realized that a 1ms wait still works, so I reduced it to that.
Stefan |
|
07 May 2024, Musaab Al-Bakry, Forum, Midas Sequencer with less than 1 second wait
|
> Actually I realized that a 1ms wait still works, so I reduced it to that.
>
> Stefan
|
 04 Jul 2024, Nick Hastings, Forum, mfe.cxx with RO_STOPPED and EQ_POLLED
|
Dear Midas experts,
I noticed that a check was added to mfe.cxx in 1961af0d6:
|
|
04 Jul 2024, Nick Hastings, Forum, mfe.cxx with RO_STOPPED and EQ_POLLED
|
I just discovered https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/338/mfec-ro_stopped-is-now-forbidden
> Dear Midas experts,
|
|
06 Aug 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, mfe.cxx with RO_STOPPED and EQ_POLLED
|
> I noticed that a check was added to mfe.cxx in 1961af0d6:
>
> + /* check for consistent common settings */
|
|
15 Aug 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, "Safe" abort of sequencer scripts
|
We often use the MIDAS sequencer to temporarily control detector settings, such as:
* <change some setting>
|
|
19 Aug 2024, Stefan Ritt, Forum, "Safe" abort of sequencer scripts
|
This request came more than once in the past. One thing I could implement is a "atexit" function similarly to the C funciton atexit().
Then we would have a function in the script which gets called whenever one does "stop immediately". This function can then restore
|
|
22 Aug 2024, Scott Oser, Forum, "Safe" abort of sequencer scripts
|
> This request came more than once in the past. One thing I could implement is a "atexit" function similarly to the C funciton atexit().
>
> Then we would have a function in the script which gets called whenever one does "stop immediately". This function can then restore
|
05 Sep 2024, Jack Carlton, Forum, Python frontend rate limitations? 
|
I'm trying to get a sense of the rate limitations of a python frontend. I
understand this will vary from system to system.
|
|
05 Sep 2024, Ben Smith, Forum, Python frontend rate limitations?
|
> What limits the rate that poll_func is called in a python frontend?
First the general advice: if you reduce the "period" of your equipment, then your function will get called more frequently. You can set it to 0 and we'll |