 19 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error 
|
Dear Konstantin,
Thank you for your interest in my problem.
|
|
19 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
ok, thank you for your information. I cannot reproduce this problem, I use vanilla Ubuntu
LTS 22, ROOT binary kit root_v6.30.02.Linux-ubuntu22.04-x86_64-gcc11.4 from root.cern.ch
and latest midas from git.
|
|
19 Mar 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> ok, thank you for your information. I cannot reproduce this problem, I use vanilla Ubuntu
> LTS 22, ROOT binary kit root_v6.30.02.Linux-ubuntu22.04-x86_64-gcc11.4 from root.cern.ch
> and latest midas from git.
|
|
28 Mar 2024, Grzegorz Nieradka, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
I found solution for my trouble. With MIDAS and ROOT everything is OK,
the trobule was with my Ubuntu enviroment.
|
|
02 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, Midas (manalyzer) + ROOT 6.31/01 - compilation error
|
> I found solution for my trouble. With MIDAS and ROOT everything is OK,
> the trobule was with my Ubuntu enviroment.
|
 15 Apr 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, open MIDAS RPC ports
|
we had a bit of trouble with open network ports recently and I now think security of MIDAS RPC
ports needs to be tightened.
|
|
15 Apr 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, open MIDAS RPC ports
|
One thing coming to my mind is the interface binding. If you have a midas host with two networks
("global" and "local"=192.168.x.x), you can tell to which interface a socket should bind.
By default it binds both interfaces, but we could restrict the socket only to bind to the local
|
|
30 Apr 2024, Luigi Vigani, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Good afternoon,
After updating Midas to the latest develop commit
|
|
03 May 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Could you please export and send me the /Sequencer ODB tree (or just /Sequencer/Param and /Sequencer/Variables) in both cases while the sequence is running.
|
|
03 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Ok, here is the complete code to reproduce the problem. Load parameter_test.msl which includes functions.msl. From the screenshot you see the variables
containing
garbage, and you also see that from the ODB screenshot. For completeness, I added Sequencer.json which contains the whole sequencer tree.
|
|
03 May 2024, Luigi Vigani, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
It is pretty much the same as Stefan, I attach here the screenshots. Also in my case it works sometimes, and sometimes partially (one or 2 params, like
in
attachment 3).
|
|
03 May 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
I have been able to reproduce the problem only once. From what I see, it seems that the Variables ODB tree is not initialized properly from the Param tree.
Below are the messages from the failed run compared to a successful one. As far as I could see, the javascript code does not change anything in the Variables
ODB tree (only monitors it). The actual changes are done by the sequencer program, or am I wrong?
|
|
03 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Ahh, that rings a bell:
1) JS opens start dialog box
|
|
03 May 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Thanks for the hint Stefan. I pushed a possible fix but I cannot test it since I cannot reproduce the issue.
> Ahh, that rings a bell:
|
|
03 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
Seems to me like the problem happens less frequently, but I still see it (1 out of 5 or so). The fact that /Sequencer/Params/Value is empty tells me that
the GUI
has the problem and not the sequencer side.
|
|
10 May 2024, Zaher Salman, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
I think that I finally managed to fix the problem. The default values of the parameters are now written first in one go, then the sequencer waits for confirmation
that everything is completed before proceeding. Please test and let me know if there are still any issues.
|
|
13 May 2024, Luigi Vigani, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
[quote="Zaher Salman"]I think that I finally managed to fix the problem. The default values of the parameters are now written first in one
go, then the sequencer waits for confirmation that everything is completed before proceeding. Please test and let me know if there are still any issues.
Zaher [/quote] |
|
13 May 2024, Luigi Vigani, Bug Report, Params not initialized when starting sequencer
|
[quote="Zaher Salman"]I think that I finally managed to fix the problem. The default values of the parameters are now written first in one go, then the
sequencer waits for confirmation that everything is completed before proceeding. Please test and let me know if there are still any issues.
|
|
16 May 2024, Konstantin Olchanski, Bug Report, midas alarm borked condition evaluation
|
I am updating the TRIUMF IRIS experiment to the latest version of MIDAS. I see following error messages in midas.log:
19:06:16.806 2024/05/16 [mhttpd,ERROR] [odb.cxx:6967:db_get_data_index,ERROR] index (29) exceeds array length (20) for key
|
|
17 May 2024, Stefan Ritt, Bug Report, midas alarm borked condition evaluation
|
This is a common problem I also encountered in the past. You get a low-level ODB access error (could also be a read of a non-existing key) and you
have no idea where this comes from. Could be the alarm system, a mhttpd web page, even some user code in a front-end over which the midas library
has no control.
|