MIDAS does not seem to be consistent (or at least convenient) with how it
handles booleans in AJAX functions.

When you request an ODB value that is a boolean with AJAX call like

http://neut14.triumf.ca:8081/?cmd=jcopy&odb=/Equipment/DCRC/Common/Hidden&format=json-nokeys

then you get

{ "Hidden/last_written" : 1437065425, "Hidden" : false }

This seems correct, since the JSON convention has booleans encoded as true/false.

But this convention does not work when trying to set the boolean value. For instance

http://neut14.triumf.ca:8081/?cmd=jset&odb=/Equipment/DCRC/Common/Hidden&format=json-nokeys&value=true

does not set the variable to true. To make this work you need to use the
characters y/n

http://neut14.triumf.ca:8081/?cmd=jset&odb=/Equipment/DCRC/Common/Hidden&format=json-nokeys&value=y

I tested this with ajax/jset, but the same problem seems to occur when using the
javascript function ODBSet. The documentation doesn't say what sort of encoding
to use when using these functions, so I guess the idea is that these functions
use MIDAS encoding for booleans. But it seems to me that it would be more
convenient if jset/ODBSet allowed the option to use json/javascript encoding for
boolean values; or at least had that as a format option for jset/ODBSet.  That
way my javascript could look like

var mybool = true;
URI_command =
"?cmd=jset&odb=/Equipment/DCRC/Common/Hidden&format=json-nokeys&value=" + mybool;

instead of

var mybool = true;
URI_command = ""
if(mybool){
  URI_command =
"?cmd=jset&odb=/Equipment/DCRC/Common/Hidden&format=json-nokeys&value=y";
else
  URI_command =
"?cmd=jset&odb=/Equipment/DCRC/Common/Hidden&format=json-nokeys&value=n";


__________________________________________________________
Cross-posting from bitbucket issue tracker:

https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/29/jset-odbset-using-true-false-for-booleans

New version of MIDAS has a feature where it seems to automatically resize the
message page horizontally in order to fix each MIDAS message into one line. 
Some of my MIDAS messages (in particular error messages, where I need details)
are very long.  The result is that the MIDAS page automatically becomes very
wide and I have to scroll a lot left/right in order to read my messages.  This
is annoying.

I would vote to roll-back this new feature.

> 
> I recommend that you use "mhttpd --mg" as the alternative for running "mhttpd -p" behind an apache 
> proxy. Using "mhttpd -p" (no HTTPS/SSL) on an internet-connected machine is insecure and should not be 
> done. (private network such as 192.168.x.y addresses is okey for now, I guess).

Finally reading through your documentation in detail [1,2].  I find that I don't understand this recommendation to use secure mongoose 
instead of putting mhttpd behind an apache proxy.  I think that it is nice to have secure mhttpd with mongoose as an option, but your 
documentation seems to imply that mhttpd-mongoose is much better than mhttpd-behind-apache and that the latter solution is strongly 
deprecated.

Perhaps I am not understanding the benefits of the new system.  In reference [2] you say "If this is not possible, somewhat better security 
for HTTP is gained by using a password protected SSL (https) proxy."  This seems to imply that the security of mhttpd-mongoose is better 
than the security of mhttpd-behind-apache.  Is that correct?  I thought that they provided similar security (assuming you follow 
recommended configurations for APACHE).

Setting up apache is trivial and it seems that mhttpd-behind-apache has other advantages, like being able to put other web resources 
(ganglia, cameras, elog, etc) behind the same secure server.  Also you can start to build complicated custom pages that are served directly 
from apache and just use MIDAS AJAX calls.  I was imagining slowly moving away from using mhttpd at all and just having html/js/css 
resources served up by apache.

So, unless I'm missing something, at this point I would continue to recommend people use mhttpd-behind-apache and I'd suggest this be 
presented as an equally valid option in the documentation.

[1] https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Mhttpd
[2] https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Setup_MIDAS_experiment#Install_SSL_proxy

> > 
> > I find that I don't understand this recommendation to use secure mongoose 
> > instead of putting mhttpd behind an apache proxy.
> >
> 
> This is a very valid question.
> 
> I think for a small operation that does not require root access to the host computer, mhttpd+mongoose is a good light weight solution.
> ...
> So, which one to use?
> 
> - for maximum security, use httpd apache (but remember to restrict access to mhttpd web port to be "only from the proxy")
> - for light-weight cases, or when root access is not available use built-in https in mhttpd.
> 
> The midas wiki documentation should probably be updated to explain all of this.


Thanks for the detailed explanation.  I agree with your recommendations.  I was mostly interested in having both options treated equally in the documentation.

My only small complaint is that since the default mhttpd comes with mongoose security turned on, you need to explicitly disable the mhttpd+mongoose security first before you can start setting up apache.  I guess that the motivation is 
that we should force people to disable security, rather than hoping that they will enable it.  That's a convincing argument; so all I really need is that this procedure be well documented.

On my macbook (OS X 10.10.3) I get this error message when starting mhttpd with mongoose-SSL:

[mhttpd,ERROR] [mhttpd.cxx:17092:mongoose,ERROR] mongoose web server error: set_ssl_option: 
openssl "modern cryptography" ECDH ciphers not available

mhttpd seems to start fine anyway and safari connects to the secure midas page without complaining 
about the SSL (it complains about the certificate of course).  So maybe this error message is 
relatively harmless?

I don't get this error message with Scientific Linux 6.7.

Hi,

We have recently been changing the code in mhttpd that maps custom web pages and resources to 
particular files on the server file system.  Ie, changing the code that uses the ODB keys in /Custom to 
map a web address like 

http://myhost:8081/CS/MyCustomPage 

to some file like

/home/user/resource/mypage.html

This mapping gets complicated when you use the /Custom/Path key to specify a location for web 
resources like images.  We have tried to summarize how the current system works on the wiki

https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Custom_ODB_tree

Please provide any suggestions on how either the documentation or the actual algorithm can be 
improved.

There were some complaints that the MIDAS sequencer was slow.  Specifically, the
complaint was that even lines in the sequence that didn't do any (like COMMENT
commands) tooks > 100ms to execute.  These slow sequencer steps could be a
little annoying if a script had to change a large number of ODB variables before
starting.

I tested this a little using a trivial sequence; note that I did all tests using
mhttpd with mongoose enabled on a newer macbook pro.  I found that with the
mongoose server each line in a sequencer script was taking ~100ms.  This is
consistent with the loop in the main thread, which is only doing a cm_yield and
a sleep:

   while (!_abort) {
      status = ss_mutex_wait_for(request_mutex, 0);
      status = cm_yield(0);
      if (status == RPC_SHUTDOWN)
         break;
      sequencer();
      status = ss_mutex_release(request_mutex);
      ss_sleep(100);
   }

I tested reducing the sleep to 20ms.  As expected, this made the sequencer more
zippy, able to execute ~50 commands per second.

I tried to think what would be downsides to making this change.  I think that
the main web communication should not be affected, because that communication is
all handled by the separate mongoose thread.

I checked how much extra CPU was used if the sleep was reduced from 100ms to
20ms.  I found that when a sequence was not running the CPU increased from 0% to
0.2% with my change.  When a sequence was running the CPU increased from 0.8% to
4% with my change.  4% is a little high, though I'd say still reasonable.  I
found that most of the CPU usage was occuring because every call to
'sequencer()' resulted in a call to db_set_record("/Sequencer/State"...).  I
guess that making that call 50 times causes the somewhat heavy CPU usage.

I would argue that it would still be worth making that change, so that the
sequencer can be more zippy.

> There were some complaints that the MIDAS sequencer was slow.  Specifically, the
> complaint was that even lines in the sequence that didn't do any (like COMMENT
> commands) tooks > 100ms to execute.  These slow sequencer steps could be a
> little annoying if a script had to change a large number of ODB variables before
> starting.
> ...
> I checked how much extra CPU was used if the sleep was reduced from 100ms to
> 20ms.  I found that when a sequence was not running the CPU increased from 0% to
> 0.2% with my change.  When a sequence was running the CPU increased from 0.8% to
> 4% with my change.  4% is a little high, though I'd say still reasonable.  I
> found that most of the CPU usage was occuring because every call to
> 'sequencer()' resulted in a call to db_set_record("/Sequencer/State"...).  I
> guess that making that call 50 times causes the somewhat heavy CPU usage.

One additional point: I think that it would be reasonably simple to reduce this CPU
usage even while a sequence was going on.  I would guess that for many sequences a
lot of time was spent in a 'WAIT SECONDS' command, since you would presumably want
to wait while data was being taken or conditions stabilizing.  I think that if you
are in a 'WAIT SECONDS' command that hasn't been satisfied then there probably isn't
any reason to do the db_set_record at the end of the sequencer() method.

> > I checked how much extra CPU was used if the sleep was reduced from 100ms to
> > 20ms.  I found that when a sequence was not running the CPU increased from 0% to
> > 0.2% with my change.  When a sequence was running the CPU increased from 0.8% to
> > 4% with my change.  4% is a little high, though I'd say still reasonable.  I
> > found that most of the CPU usage was occuring because every call to
> > 'sequencer()' resulted in a call to db_set_record("/Sequencer/State"...).  I
> > guess that making that call 50 times causes the somewhat heavy CPU usage.
> > 
> > I would argue that it would still be worth making that change, so that the
> > sequencer can be more zippy.
> 
> The minimal time slice on most systems is 10 ms, and nothing prevents us from switching to
> that. The original 100 ms was more for the fact that you can see the sequencer statements
> executed one after the other (with the color bar). But this is more a "debugging" feature which 
> we not really need. 

OK, I made this change; sleep is now 10ms on main thread.  Seems to work fine on SL6 and MacOS.

> To do it "right" the sequencer would have to _return_ a sleep time. Like if it is in a wait loop (as
> most of the time), the sleep time could be close to 1 second, to correctly update the wait
> progress bar. If the sequencer executes ODB set statements, the wait time could be zero, so
> thousands of statements can be executed in one second. The problem we will then have of course
> that the sequencer will block the "request_mutex" almost always, which would prevent the
> mongoose server from serving anything. So this should be carefully tested. It could be (on most OS)
> that releasing the mutex by the main loop immediately switches to the mongoose thread, which would
> make the web server still quite responsive, but I'm not sure about that. So as a first change making
> the sleep time 10ms should be fine.

Hmm, yeah, I'm not sure about how to handle reducing the wait time to zero after ODB set commands.

But it does seem like it would be straight-forward to increase the sleep time for waits; I'll look into
a clean way of doing that.

We have started a new elog for discussions of the ROOTANA MIDAS analyzer package
[1], which is used at TRIUMF and elsewhere for quick displays of MIDAS data. 
The forum is available here

https://midas.triumf.ca/elog/Rootana

I would note that we have recently finished implementing a system in rootana for
easy web displays of MIDAS data, using ROOT's THttpServer to post histograms. 
Details on this new scheme are here

https://midas.triumf.ca/elog/Rootana/1

and

https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Rootana_javascript_displays

Please sign up for the forum if you are interested in getting ROOTANA-related
discussions.

Thomas

[1] https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/ROOTANA

I recently upgraded my macbook to MacOS 10.11.  The compilation of MIDAS failed after the upgrade, 
complaining about  

gcc  -c -g -O2 -Wall <snip> src/mongoose.c
src/mongoose.c:322:10: fatal error: 'openssl/ssl.h' file not found

It seems that MacOS has now fully removed openssl header files (they were deprecated for a while).  There 
seems to be some notes on that here

http://lists.apple.com/archives/macnetworkprog/2015/Jun/msg00025.html

Konstantin suggested installing open-source builds of openssl using MacPorts.  I did that and MIDAS 
compiled fine.  I documented the procedure here:

https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Installation/Compilation_problems#MacOS_10.11_.28El_Capitan.2
9_openssl_errors

> > I've recently run into issues when using JSON.parse on ODB keys containing 
> > 8-bit data.
> 
> I am tempted to take a hard line and say that in general MIDAS TID_STRING data should be valid 
> UTF-8 encoded Unicode. In the modern mixed javascript/json/whatever environment I think
> it is impractical to handle or permit invalid UTF-8 strings.
> ....
> But in your specific case, why do you have random control characters in your TID_STRING data? 
> Maybe you are using TID_STRING as general storage instead of arrays of TID_CHAR or 
> TID_DWORD?

I'm a little confused by this report and want to make sure I understand the situation.  Konstantin points
out that the TID_STRING should be valid UTF-8.  But I think that Amy agreed that the string was valid UTF-8.
 My understanding was that Amy's contention was that the valid UTF-8 string didn't get returned as valid JSON.

But I am having trouble reproducing your behaviour Amy.  I created a ODB string variable with a tab control
control character

  sprintf(mystring,"first line \t second line");
  status = db_set_value(hDB, 0,"/test2/mystring", &mystring, size, 1, TID_STRING);

and what I tried to pull the ODB using jcopy

http://neut18:8081/?cmd=jcopy&odb=/test2/mystring&format=json

I got 

{
"mystring/key" : { "type" : 12, "item_size" : 32, "access_mode" : 7, "last_written" : 1477416322 },
"mystring" : "first line \t second line"
}

which seems to be valid JSON.  

I only tried this with tab.  Are there other control characters that you are having trouble with?  Or maybe
I misunderstand the question?





> 
> > 
> > For JSON.parse to successfully parse a string, (A) the string must be valid 
> > UTF-8, (B) several whitespace characters, control characters, and the 
> > characters " and \ must be escaped, and (C) you've got to follow the key-
> > value rules laid out in http://www.json.org/.
> > 
> > The web browser takes care of (A), and I verified that for this key Midas 
> > handled (C) correctly.  In principle, the function json_write in odb.c 
> > handles (B) - but json_write does not escape control characters.
> > 
> > To manage this problem, I modified json_write (in odb.c) to replace any 
> > control character with the more-inocuous character, 'C'.  My default case 
> > now looks like:
> > 
> > default:
> >          {
> >            // if a char is a control character,
> >            // print 'C' in its place
> >            // note that this loses data:
> >            // a more-correct method would be to print
> >            // \uXXXX, where XXXX is the character in hex
> >            if(iscntrl(*s)){
> >              (*buffer)[(*buffer_end)++] = 'C';
> >              s++;
> >            } else {
> >              (*buffer)[(*buffer_end)++] = *s++;
> >            }
> >          }
> >       
> > Where the call to iscntrl(*s) requires the addition of the ctype.h header 
> > file.
> > 
> > I'm guessing a blanket replacement of control characters with 'C' isn't 
> > something all Midas users would want to do.  Replacing the control character 
> > with its hex value seems like a good choice - but not without adding bounds 
> > checking!
> > 
> > An alternative to changing odb.c could be to add a regex to Midas response 
> > text which removes all control characters (U+0000 - U+001F): 
> > 
> > var resp_lint = req.response.replace(/[\u{0000}-\u{001F}]/gmu, '');
> > var json_obj = JSON.parse(resp_lint);
> > 
> > Unfortunately, the 'u' regex flax doesn't work on the Firefox version 
> > included in Scientific Linux 6.8.  

Hi Tim,

I reproduced your problem and then managed to go through a procedure to increase the number of allowable open records.  The following is the procedure that I used 

1) Use odbedit to save current ODB

odbedit
save current_odb.odb

2) Stop all the running MIDAS processes, including mlogger and mserver using the web interface. Then stop mhttpd as well.

3) Remove your old ODB (we will recreate it after modifying MIDAS, using the backup you just made).

mv .ODB.SHM .ODB.SHM.20161104
rm /dev/shm/thomas_ODB_SHM

4) Make the following modifications to midas.  In this particular case I have increased the max number of open records from 256 to 1024.  You would need to change the constants if you want to change to other values

diff --git a/include/midas.h b/include/midas.h
index 02b30dd..33be7be 100644
--- a/include/midas.h
+++ b/include/midas.h
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ typedef std::vector<std::string> STRING_LIST;
-#define MAX_OPEN_RECORDS       256           /**< number of open DB records   */
+#define MAX_OPEN_RECORDS       1024           /**< number of open DB records   */
diff --git a/src/odb.c b/src/odb.c
index 47ace8f..ac1bef3 100755
--- a/src/odb.c
+++ b/src/odb.c
@@ -699,8 +699,8 @@ static void db_validate_sizes()
-   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_CLIENT) == 2112);
-   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_HEADER) == 135232);
+   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_CLIENT) == 8256);
+   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_HEADER) == 528448);

The calculation is as follows (in case you want a different number of open records): 
DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 8*MAX_OPEN_ERCORDS = 64 + 8*1024 = 8256
DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 64*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 64*8256 = 528448

5) Rebuild MIDAS

make clean; make

6) Create new ODB

odbedit -s 1000000

Change the size of the ODB to whatever you want.

7) reload your original ODB 

load  current_odb.odb

8) Rebuild your frontend against new MIDAS; then it should work and you should be able to produce more open records.

8.5*) Actually, I had a weird error where I needed to remove my .SYSTEM.SHM file as well when I first restarted my front-end.  Not sure if that was some unrelated error, but I mention it here for completeness.

This was a procedure based on something that originally was used for T2K (procedure by Renee Poutissou).  It is possible that not all steps are necessary and that there is a better way.  But this worked for me.

Also, any objections from other developers to tweaking the assert checks in odb.c so that the values are calculated automatically and MIDAS only needs to be touched in one place to modify the number of open records?

Let me know if it worked for you and I'll add these instructions to the Wiki.

Thomas


> oOne additional comment. I was able to trace the setting of the error code DB_NO_MEMORY 
> to a call to the db_add_open_record() by mserver that is initiated during the start-up 
> of my frontend via an RPC call. I checked with a debug printout that I have indeed 
> reached the number of MAX_OPEN_RECORDS
> 
> > Hi Midas forum,
> > 
> > I'm having a problem with odb hotlinks after increasing sub-directories in an 
> > odb. I now get the error code DB_NO_MEMORY after some db_open_record() calls. I 
> > tried 
> > 
> > 1) increasing the parameter DEFAULT_ODB_SIZE in midas.h and make clean, make
> > but got the same error
> > 
> > 2) increasing the parameter  MAX_OPEN_RECORDS in midas.h and make clean, make
> > but got fatal errors from odbedit and my midas FE and couldnt run anything
> > 
> > 3) deleting my expts SHM files and starting odbedit with "odbedit -e SLAC -s 
> > 0x1000000" to increse the odb size but got the same error?
> > 
> > 4) I tried a different computer and got the same error code DB_NO_MEMORY
> > 
> > Maybe I running into some system limit that restricts the humber of open records? 
> > Or maybe I've not increased the correct midas parameter?
> > 
> > Best ,Tim.

Hi Tim,

I reproduced your problem and then managed to go through a procedure to increase the number
of allowable open records.  The following is the procedure that I used 

1) Use odbedit to save current ODB

odbedit
save current_odb.odb

2) Stop all the running MIDAS processes, including mlogger and mserver using the web
interface. Then stop mhttpd as well.


3) Remove your old ODB (we will recreate it after modifying MIDAS, using the backup you just
made).

mv .ODB.SHM .ODB.SHM.20161104
rm /dev/shm/thomas_ODB_SHM

4) Make the following modifications to midas.  In this particular case I have increased the
max number of open records from 256 to 1024.  You would need to change the constants if you
want to change to other values

diff --git a/include/midas.h b/include/midas.h
index 02b30dd..33be7be 100644
--- a/include/midas.h
+++ b/include/midas.h
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ typedef std::vector<std::string> STRING_LIST;
-#define MAX_OPEN_RECORDS       256           /**< number of open DB records   */
+#define MAX_OPEN_RECORDS       1024           /**< number of open DB records   */
diff --git a/src/odb.c b/src/odb.c
index 47ace8f..ac1bef3 100755
--- a/src/odb.c
+++ b/src/odb.c
@@ -699,8 +699,8 @@ static void db_validate_sizes()
-   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_CLIENT) == 2112);
-   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_HEADER) == 135232);
+   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_CLIENT) == 8256);
+   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_HEADER) == 528448);

The calculation is as follows (in case you want a different number of open records): 
DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 8*MAX_OPEN_ERCORDS = 64 + 8*1024 = 8256
DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 64*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 64*8256 = 528448

5) Rebuild MIDAS

make clean; make

6) Create new ODB

odbedit -s 1000000

Change the size of the ODB to whatever you want.

7) reload your original ODB 

load  current_odb.odb

8) Rebuild your frontend against new MIDAS; then it should work and you should be able to
produce more open records.

8.5*) Actually, I had a weird error where I needed to remove my .SYSTEM.SHM file as well
when I first restarted my front-end.  Not sure if that was some unrelated error, but I
mention it here for completeness.

This was a procedure based on something that originally was used for T2K (procedure by Renee
Poutissou).  It is possible that not all steps are necessary and that there is a better way.
 But this worked for me.

Also, any objections from other developers to tweaking the assert checks in odb.c so that
the values are calculated automatically and MIDAS only needs to be touched in one place to
modify the number of open records?

Let me know if it worked for you and I'll add these instructions to the Wiki.

Thomas



> oOne additional comment. I was able to trace the setting of the error code DB_NO_MEMORY 
> to a call to the db_add_open_record() by mserver that is initiated during the start-up 
> of my frontend via an RPC call. I checked with a debug printout that I have indeed 
> reached the number of MAX_OPEN_RECORDS
> 
> > Hi Midas forum,
> > 
> > I'm having a problem with odb hotlinks after increasing sub-directories in an 
> > odb. I now get the error code DB_NO_MEMORY after some db_open_record() calls. I 
> > tried 
> > 
> > 1) increasing the parameter DEFAULT_ODB_SIZE in midas.h and make clean, make
> > but got the same error
> > 
> > 2) increasing the parameter  MAX_OPEN_RECORDS in midas.h and make clean, make
> > but got fatal errors from odbedit and my midas FE and couldnt run anything
> > 
> > 3) deleting my expts SHM files and starting odbedit with "odbedit -e SLAC -s 
> > 0x1000000" to increse the odb size but got the same error?
> > 
> > 4) I tried a different computer and got the same error code DB_NO_MEMORY
> > 
> > Maybe I running into some system limit that restricts the humber of open records? 
> > Or maybe I've not increased the correct midas parameter?
> > 
> > Best ,Tim.

The procedure I wrote seemed to work for Tim too, so I added a page to the wiki about it here:

https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/FAQ


> Hi Tim,
> 
> I reproduced your problem and then managed to go through a procedure to increase the number
> of allowable open records.  The following is the procedure that I used 
> 
> 1) Use odbedit to save current ODB
> 
> odbedit
> save current_odb.odb
> 
> 2) Stop all the running MIDAS processes, including mlogger and mserver using the web
> interface. Then stop mhttpd as well.
> 
> 
> 3) Remove your old ODB (we will recreate it after modifying MIDAS, using the backup you just
> made).
> 
> mv .ODB.SHM .ODB.SHM.20161104
> rm /dev/shm/thomas_ODB_SHM
> 
> 4) Make the following modifications to midas.  In this particular case I have increased the
> max number of open records from 256 to 1024.  You would need to change the constants if you
> want to change to other values
> 
> diff --git a/include/midas.h b/include/midas.h
> index 02b30dd..33be7be 100644
> --- a/include/midas.h
> +++ b/include/midas.h
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ typedef std::vector<std::string> STRING_LIST;
> -#define MAX_OPEN_RECORDS       256           /**< number of open DB records   */
> +#define MAX_OPEN_RECORDS       1024           /**< number of open DB records   */
> diff --git a/src/odb.c b/src/odb.c
> index 47ace8f..ac1bef3 100755
> --- a/src/odb.c
> +++ b/src/odb.c
> @@ -699,8 +699,8 @@ static void db_validate_sizes()
> -   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_CLIENT) == 2112);
> -   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_HEADER) == 135232);
> +   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_CLIENT) == 8256);
> +   assert(sizeof(DATABASE_HEADER) == 528448);
> 
> The calculation is as follows (in case you want a different number of open records): 
> DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 8*MAX_OPEN_ERCORDS = 64 + 8*1024 = 8256
> DATABASE_HEADER = 64 + 64*DATABASE_CLIENT = 64 + 64*8256 = 528448
> 
> 5) Rebuild MIDAS
> 
> make clean; make
> 
> 6) Create new ODB
> 
> odbedit -s 1000000
> 
> Change the size of the ODB to whatever you want.
> 
> 7) reload your original ODB 
> 
> load  current_odb.odb
> 
> 8) Rebuild your frontend against new MIDAS; then it should work and you should be able to
> produce more open records.
> 
> 8.5*) Actually, I had a weird error where I needed to remove my .SYSTEM.SHM file as well
> when I first restarted my front-end.  Not sure if that was some unrelated error, but I
> mention it here for completeness.
> 
> This was a procedure based on something that originally was used for T2K (procedure by Renee
> Poutissou).  It is possible that not all steps are necessary and that there is a better way.
>  But this worked for me.
> 
> Also, any objections from other developers to tweaking the assert checks in odb.c so that
> the values are calculated automatically and MIDAS only needs to be touched in one place to
> modify the number of open records?
> 
> Let me know if it worked for you and I'll add these instructions to the Wiki.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> > oOne additional comment. I was able to trace the setting of the error code DB_NO_MEMORY 
> > to a call to the db_add_open_record() by mserver that is initiated during the start-up 
> > of my frontend via an RPC call. I checked with a debug printout that I have indeed 
> > reached the number of MAX_OPEN_RECORDS
> > 
> > > Hi Midas forum,
> > > 
> > > I'm having a problem with odb hotlinks after increasing sub-directories in an 
> > > odb. I now get the error code DB_NO_MEMORY after some db_open_record() calls. I 
> > > tried 
> > > 
> > > 1) increasing the parameter DEFAULT_ODB_SIZE in midas.h and make clean, make
> > > but got the same error
> > > 
> > > 2) increasing the parameter  MAX_OPEN_RECORDS in midas.h and make clean, make
> > > but got fatal errors from odbedit and my midas FE and couldnt run anything
> > > 
> > > 3) deleting my expts SHM files and starting odbedit with "odbedit -e SLAC -s 
> > > 0x1000000" to increse the odb size but got the same error?
> > > 
> > > 4) I tried a different computer and got the same error code DB_NO_MEMORY
> > > 
> > > Maybe I running into some system limit that restricts the humber of open records? 
> > > Or maybe I've not increased the correct midas parameter?
> > > 
> > > Best ,Tim.

> > I've recently run into issues when using JSON.parse on ODB keys containing 
> > 8-bit data.
> 
> I am tempted to take a hard line and say that in general MIDAS TID_STRING data should be valid 
> UTF-8 encoded Unicode. In the modern mixed javascript/json/whatever environment I think
> it is impractical to handle or permit invalid UTF-8 strings.
> 
> Certainly in the general case, replacing all control characters with something else or escaping them or 
> otherwise changing the value if TID_STRING data would wreck *valid* UTF-8 strings, which I would 
> assume to be the normal use.
> 
> In other words, non-UTF-8 strings are following non-IEEE-754 floating point values into oblivion - as 
> we do not check the TID_FLOAT and TID_DOUBLE is valid IEEE-754 values, we should not check 
> that TID_STRING is valid UTF-8.

I agree that I think we should start requiring strings to be UTF-8 encoded unicode. 

I'd suggest that before worrying about the TID_STRING data, we should start by sanitizing the ODB key names.
 I've seen a couple cases where the ODB key name is a non-UTF-8 string.  It is very awkward to use odbedit
to delete these keys.

I attach a suggested modification to odb.c that rejects calls to db_create_key with non-UTF-8 key names.  It
uses some random function I found on the internet that is supposed to check if a string is valid UTF-8.  I
checked a couple of strings with invalid UTF-8 characters and it correctly identified them.  But I won't
claim to be certain that this is really identifying all UTF-8 vs non-UTF-8 cases.  Maybe others have a
better way of identifying this.

> I switched mhttpd to use the new javascript based run start and stop pages.

One initial complaint: the transition.html page doesn't seem to deal well with a frontend program using
a deferred transition.  Specifically, I find with my simulated frontend ([1]), which has a deferred
end-of-run transition, that two problems happen:

i) the page doesn't give any indication that a frontend has a deferred transition; in fact it says that
the frontend immediately has finished the transition.
ii) once the deferred transition has finished, the page doesn't switch to saying that the run has
stopped.  In fact, even if I reload the transition page it still continues to show that the run is
ongoing; the status page, by contrast, shows that the run has stopped.

I separately still think that the transition page should automatically go away after 5 seconds
(assuming that all the transitions were successful).  I think it is annoying that you need to click
back to the status page.

[1] https://github.com/thomaslindner/fesimdaq

> > In other words, non-UTF-8 strings are following non-IEEE-754 floating point values into oblivion - as 
> > we do not check the TID_FLOAT and TID_DOUBLE is valid IEEE-754 values, we should not check 
> > that TID_STRING is valid UTF-8.
> ...
> I attach a suggested modification to odb.c that rejects calls to db_create_key with non-UTF-8 key names.  It
> uses some random function I found on the internet that is supposed to check if a string is valid UTF-8.  I
> checked a couple of strings with invalid UTF-8 characters and it correctly identified them.  But I won't
> claim to be certain that this is really identifying all UTF-8 vs non-UTF-8 cases.  Maybe others have a
> better way of identifying this.

At Konstantin's suggestion, I committed the function I found for checking if a string was UTF-8 compatible to
odb.c.  The function is currently not used; I commented out a proposed use in db_create_key.  Experts can decide
if the code was good enough to use.

> At Konstantin's suggestion, I committed the function I found for checking if a string was UTF-8 compatible to
> odb.c.  The function is currently not used; I commented out a proposed use in db_create_key.  Experts can decide
> if the code was good enough to use.

After more discussion, I have enabled the parts of the ODB code that check that key names are UTF-8 compliant. 

This check will show up in (at least) two ways:

1) Attempts to create a new ODB variable if the ODB key is not UTF-8 compliant.  You will see error messages like

[fesimdaq,ERROR] [odb.c:572:db_validate_name,ERROR] Invalid name "Eur€" passed to db_create_key: UTF-8 incompatible
string

2) When a program first connects to the ODB, it runs a check to ensure that the ODB is valid.  This will now include
a check that all key names are UTF-8 compliant. Any non-UTF8 compliant key names will be replaced by a string of the
pointer to the key.  You will see error messages like:

[fesimdaq,ERROR] [odb.c:572:db_validate_name,ERROR] Invalid name "Eur€" passed to db_validate_key: UTF-8
incompatible string
[fesimdaq,ERROR] [odb.c:647:db_validate_key,ERROR] Warning: corrected key "/Equipment/SIMDAQ/Eur€": invalid name
"Eur€" replaced with "0x7f74be63f970"

This behaviour (checking UTF-8 compatibility and automatically fixing ODB names) can be disabled by setting an
environment variable

MIDAS_INVALID_STRING_IS_OK

It doesn't matter what the environment variable is set to; it just needs to be set.  Note also that this variable is
only checked once, when a program starts.

> > > I think there sneaked in a little bug in the mhttpd: when starting an experiment
> > > from scratch and starting the mhttpd, the Menu Buttons are missing
> 
> Ok, the original problem with a small bug in the javascript code for the menu buttons (fixed now),
> but I was moved to implement something I wanted to do for a long time.
> 

Is this change back-wards compatible with an old ODB?  Ie, if I upgrade MIDAS, will it notice that I have the old-style key "/Experiment/Menu Buttons" 
and replace it equivalently set keys in /Experiment/Menu?  Or will it just continue to use the old-style ODB key?