> When making a link in the odb (web interface) a nice browser window pop's up. There is however not scrolling possible in the window. As a result, you can not reach a odb key if it is nested to deeply. 
> 
> Trying to type out the Link target in the field only allows for 32 characters

Thanks for reporting the bug with the pop-up not being able to scroll, I fixed that and committed the change.

I do however not understand the issue with 32 characters. The link NAME should not be more than 32 chars (which applies to all ODB keys). 
But if I try I can write more than 32 chars in the link target.

Stefan

Both the /Script and /CustomScript trees in the ODB allow users to trigger a 
script via Midas - which silently truncates command strings longer than 
256 characters.

I'd prefer that Midas place no limit on string length.  Failing that, it would be
helpful to have character limits called out in the documentation 
(https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Script_ODB_tree#.3Cscript-name.3E_key_or_subtree,
https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Customscript_ODB_tree).

As far as I can tell, odb.c allows arbitrarily large strings in the ODB data.  
(Although key *names* are restricted to 256 characters.)  I've submitted one 
possible version of an arbitrary-length exec_script() as a pull request 
(https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/pull-requests/).

Am I misunderstanding any critical pieces?  Does Midas intentionally treat 
strings in the ODB as limited to 256 characters?

Thank you for reporting this problem:

a) ODB key *names* are restricted to 31 characters (32 bytes, last byte is a NUL), not 256 characters.
b) ODB string length is unlimited (32-bit length field)
c) ODB C API "db_get_value" & co require fixed length buffer and most users of this API provide a 256-byte fixed buffer for strings, some of them also do not 
check the status code, resulting in silent truncation. (I think the ODB functions themselves report truncation to midas.log, so not completely silent).

We try to fix this where we must - but it is cumbersome with the current ODB API - as in your fix on has to:
- get the ODB key, extract size
- allocate buffer
- call db_get_value() & co
- use the data
- remember to free the buffer on each and every return path

The first three steps could become one if we had an ODB "get_data" function that automatically allocated the data buffer.

But the main source of bugs will be the last step - remember to free the buffer, always.

P.S.

We are not alone in pondering how to do this best. If you want to see it "done right",
read the fresh-off-the-presses book "Go Programming Language" by Alan Donovan and Brian Kernighan,
http://www.gopl.io/

Brian Kernighan is the "K" in K&R "C programming language", still around and kicking, now at Google.
Sadly the "R" passed away in 2011 - http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/14/technology/dennis-ritchie-programming-trailblazer-dies-at-70.html

K.O.

> Both the /Script and /CustomScript trees in the ODB allow users to trigger a 
> script via Midas - which silently truncates command strings longer than 
> 256 characters.
> 
> I'd prefer that Midas place no limit on string length.  Failing that, it would be
> helpful to have character limits called out in the documentation 
> (https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Script_ODB_tree#.3Cscript-name.3E_key_or_subtree,
> https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Customscript_ODB_tree).
> 
> As far as I can tell, odb.c allows arbitrarily large strings in the ODB data.  
> (Although key *names* are restricted to 256 characters.)  I've submitted one 
> possible version of an arbitrary-length exec_script() as a pull request 
> (https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/pull-requests/).
> 
> Am I misunderstanding any critical pieces?  Does Midas intentionally treat 
> strings in the ODB as limited to 256 characters?

Using low-level memory allocation routines in higher-level programs like mhttpd makes me nervous.

We could use vector arrays to allow variable-sized allocation, and use the data() member function to access the char* needed for functions like strlcat,
db_get_data, and db_sprintf.

This conforms to the c++ standard, but doesn't require explicit freeing by the user - at least, not when you're allocating std::vector<char>.

Amy

> Thank you for reporting this problem:
> 
> a) ODB key *names* are restricted to 31 characters (32 bytes, last byte is a NUL), not 256 characters.
> b) ODB string length is unlimited (32-bit length field)
> c) ODB C API "db_get_value" & co require fixed length buffer and most users of this API provide a 256-byte fixed buffer for strings, some of them also do not 
> check the status code, resulting in silent truncation. (I think the ODB functions themselves report truncation to midas.log, so not completely silent).
> 
> We try to fix this where we must - but it is cumbersome with the current ODB API - as in your fix on has to:
> - get the ODB key, extract size
> - allocate buffer
> - call db_get_value() & co
> - use the data
> - remember to free the buffer on each and every return path
> 
> The first three steps could become one if we had an ODB "get_data" function that automatically allocated the data buffer.
> 
> But the main source of bugs will be the last step - remember to free the buffer, always.
> 
> P.S.
> 
> We are not alone in pondering how to do this best. If you want to see it "done right",
> read the fresh-off-the-presses book "Go Programming Language" by Alan Donovan and Brian Kernighan,
> http://www.gopl.io/
> 
> Brian Kernighan is the "K" in K&R "C programming language", still around and kicking, now at Google.
> Sadly the "R" passed away in 2011 - http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/14/technology/dennis-ritchie-programming-trailblazer-dies-at-70.html
> 
> K.O.
> 
> > Both the /Script and /CustomScript trees in the ODB allow users to trigger a 
> > script via Midas - which silently truncates command strings longer than 
> > 256 characters.
> > 
> > I'd prefer that Midas place no limit on string length.  Failing that, it would be
> > helpful to have character limits called out in the documentation 
> > (https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Script_ODB_tree#.3Cscript-name.3E_key_or_subtree,
> > https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Customscript_ODB_tree).
> > 
> > As far as I can tell, odb.c allows arbitrarily large strings in the ODB data.  
> > (Although key *names* are restricted to 256 characters.)  I've submitted one 
> > possible version of an arbitrary-length exec_script() as a pull request 
> > (https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/pull-requests/).
> > 
> > Am I misunderstanding any critical pieces?  Does Midas intentionally treat 
> > strings in the ODB as limited to 256 characters?

> Using low-level memory allocation routines in higher-level programs like mhttpd makes me nervous.

It should not, people have used malloc() for decades now without much injury to themselves. (Thomas corrects me: some people had big injury to their pride, me included).

> We could use vector arrays to allow variable-sized allocation, and use the data() member function to access the char* needed for functions like strlcat,
> db_get_data, and db_sprintf.

I thought auto_ptr was the correct tool to allocate "I just need a few bytes for a few minutes" arrays, but there is some discrepancy
between delete and delete[] (with brackets) and auto_ptr p(new char[i]) is verboten (even though it compiles just fine).

I ended up writing a custom replacement for auto_ptr called auto_string - now in mhttpd.cxx available for use in other places like this.

Still I think a db_get_data() that returns allocated memory is the correct solution. But this memory still needs to be released and lacking auto_ptr it opens the door for memory leaks.

> This conforms to the c++ standard, but doesn't require explicit freeing by the user - at least, not when you're allocating std::vector<char>

I do not think std::vector<char> can be cast into "char*" and used as replacement of "char str[100]" or "char* str = malloc(i);"

In other new, the limit on the command length is now removed.

K.O.

> 
> Amy
> 
> > Thank you for reporting this problem:
> > 
> > a) ODB key *names* are restricted to 31 characters (32 bytes, last byte is a NUL), not 256 characters.
> > b) ODB string length is unlimited (32-bit length field)
> > c) ODB C API "db_get_value" & co require fixed length buffer and most users of this API provide a 256-byte fixed buffer for strings, some of them also do not 
> > check the status code, resulting in silent truncation. (I think the ODB functions themselves report truncation to midas.log, so not completely silent).
> > 
> > We try to fix this where we must - but it is cumbersome with the current ODB API - as in your fix on has to:
> > - get the ODB key, extract size
> > - allocate buffer
> > - call db_get_value() & co
> > - use the data
> > - remember to free the buffer on each and every return path
> > 
> > The first three steps could become one if we had an ODB "get_data" function that automatically allocated the data buffer.
> > 
> > But the main source of bugs will be the last step - remember to free the buffer, always.
> > 
> > P.S.
> > 
> > We are not alone in pondering how to do this best. If you want to see it "done right",
> > read the fresh-off-the-presses book "Go Programming Language" by Alan Donovan and Brian Kernighan,
> > http://www.gopl.io/
> > 
> > Brian Kernighan is the "K" in K&R "C programming language", still around and kicking, now at Google.
> > Sadly the "R" passed away in 2011 - http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/14/technology/dennis-ritchie-programming-trailblazer-dies-at-70.html
> > 
> > K.O.
> > 
> > > Both the /Script and /CustomScript trees in the ODB allow users to trigger a 
> > > script via Midas - which silently truncates command strings longer than 
> > > 256 characters.
> > > 
> > > I'd prefer that Midas place no limit on string length.  Failing that, it would be
> > > helpful to have character limits called out in the documentation 
> > > (https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Script_ODB_tree#.3Cscript-name.3E_key_or_subtree,
> > > https://midas.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php//Customscript_ODB_tree).
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell, odb.c allows arbitrarily large strings in the ODB data.  
> > > (Although key *names* are restricted to 256 characters.)  I've submitted one 
> > > possible version of an arbitrary-length exec_script() as a pull request 
> > > (https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/pull-requests/).
> > > 
> > > Am I misunderstanding any critical pieces?  Does Midas intentionally treat 
> > > strings in the ODB as limited to 256 characters?

mhttpd running as non-root cannot bind to standard https port 443. By default, mhttpd uses port 
8443 and it works just fine, but some applications such as the SSLlabs https tester insist on using 
port 443.

To connect mhttpd with port 443, I use the tcpproxy package from
git://git.spreadspace.org/tcpproxy.git

./tcpproxy -D -U -p 443 -r localhost4 -o 8443

(you can run this from rc.local)

(to remember, for best security one should run mhttpd behind an industry-standard https proxy)

K.O.

1. If I am not mistaken, the mhttpd.css is hard coded (path/name) into the mhttpd. Wouldn't it be beneficial to have ODB entries where to get is from? This way people could change the look and feel more freely.
   
2. Especially the look and feel of the runlog is unsatisfactorily from my point of view. See . The old style was much more readable. I could recover the old style look and feel by slightly changing the mhttpd.cxx where I changed in show_rawfile(const char*) "dialogTable" to "runlogTable" in the table class. This way I could tinker around with the mhttpd.css by adding the following stuff there:
   
   • adding .runlogTable in line 289 :
     
   • adding some style information for the runlogTable :
     

> If I am not mistaken, the mhttpd.css is hard coded (path/name) into the mhttpd.

mhttpd.css is served from $MIDASSYS/resources/mhttpd.css. The actual path is reported on the mhttpd 
"help" page.

(I think the internal mhttpd.css and mhttpd.js should be removed as no longer useful - nothing will work 
right if the real mhttpd.js and mhttpd.css cannot be served).

> Especially the look and feel of the runlog is unsatisfactorily from my point of view.

persons in charge of implementing the CSS stuff failed to convert quite a few pages, for example, the elog 
and the history editor pages were left completely broken. (mostly fixed now).

so thank you for reporting the runlog breakage, I hope Stefan & co can fix it quickly. (I cannot do - I have 
have no runlog pages on any of my test experiments).

> the old style was much more readable.

I think the new style is not too bad, except for a few visual artefacts here and there, the general comment 
that CSS is too complicated and hard to debug and the fact that over-subtle colouring yields inconsistent 
visuals between different monitors and ambient lighting conditions. (persons who select the colours always 
respond that "but to me, it looks just fine on my laptop", making it hard to resolve any issues).

> I could recover the old style look and feel by slightly changing the mhttpd.cxx

If you post the patches that fix it for you, I can commit them to midas. (git diff | mail olchansk@triumf.ca).

K.O.

Understand me right, I mostly like the new style, except the runlog as reported.
Attached you will find the diff's you were asking for. But as pointed out, I
haven't worked so far on CSS and hence this should be checked!!

I understand that the mhttpd.js needs to be the default one, however, mhttpd.css
might be left to the end-user to adopt to their specific needs. I shortly
checked in the mhttpd demon. It checks for the resources path in the ODB. If it
also would check for a CSS name, mhttpd.css could be changed/adopted by the
end-users without breaking things (at least it would then be their one business).

> > If I am not mistaken, the mhttpd.css is hard coded (path/name) into the mhttpd.
> 
> mhttpd.css is served from $MIDASSYS/resources/mhttpd.css. The actual path is
reported on the mhttpd 
> "help" page.
> 
> (I think the internal mhttpd.css and mhttpd.js should be removed as no longer
useful - nothing will work 
> right if the real mhttpd.js and mhttpd.css cannot be served).
> 
> > Especially the look and feel of the runlog is unsatisfactorily from my point
of view.
> 
> persons in charge of implementing the CSS stuff failed to convert quite a few
pages, for example, the elog 
> and the history editor pages were left completely broken. (mostly fixed now).
> 
> so thank you for reporting the runlog breakage, I hope Stefan & co can fix it
quickly. (I cannot do - I have 
> have no runlog pages on any of my test experiments).
> 
> > the old style was much more readable.
> 
> I think the new style is not too bad, except for a few visual artefacts here
and there, the general comment 
> that CSS is too complicated and hard to debug and the fact that over-subtle
colouring yields inconsistent 
> visuals between different monitors and ambient lighting conditions. (persons
who select the colours always 
> respond that "but to me, it looks just fine on my laptop", making it hard to
resolve any issues).
> 
> > I could recover the old style look and feel by slightly changing the mhttpd.cxx
> 
> If you post the patches that fix it for you, I can commit them to midas. (git
diff | mail olchansk@triumf.ca).
> 
> K.O.

 > If I am not mistaken, the mhttpd.css is hard coded (path/name) into the mhttpd.

I agree that this should be removed, Unfortunately I'm away right now, so I will fix it next week. Also will put in 
Andreas' diffs.

/Stefan

I put mhttpd.css and mhttpd.js into the ODB, so every experiment can change it. I put also Andreas' modifications of the CSS file for the runlog table and 
committed the changes.

/Stefan

I stumbled over an oddity which I would like to understand better. Here the
boundaries:
- Enable non-localhost RPC -> y
- Disable RPC hosts check  -> y

1) I am starting a run from ODBedit (start now -v):

07:13:11.272 2017/04/19 [ODBEdit,INFO] Run #26 started

07:13:25.516 2017/04/19 [Logger,LOG] File '/data/max/dlog/lem17_0026.root'
CRC32C checksum: 0x05ca4e7e, 1523383 bytes

On this little test experiment there is not much running, but it already shows
the effect I wanted to understand.

2) I am stopping the run from ODBedit (stop -v):

07:13:25.519 2017/04/19 [ODBEdit,INFO] Run #26 stopped

So, everything looks perfectly fine up to this point.

3) Now the 'strange' thing happens. To any point in time after this, I will stop
ODBEdit which results in the following messages:

07:13:32.335 2017/04/19 [ODBEdit,INFO] Program ODBEdit on host pc7962 stopped

07:13:32.335 2017/04/19 [Logger,ERROR] [midas.c:14079:rpc_server_receive,ERROR]
rpc check ok, abort canceled

This I do NOT understand! It looks as if the Logger (or any other client which
gets the run state transition) thinks that some Client (here ODBEdit) has a
broken connection. At least this is how I understand the comment in midas.c /
rpc_server_receive(). Is something broken in the de-registration from the RPC
server? By the way, all clients where running on the localhost, i.e. no remote
connection used here.

All this only happens if a run transition took place.

Unfortunately I do not understand the system well enough to suggest any fix to
this :-( and hence would appreciate any help. 

I should really get around to fix this junk error message:

> 07:13:32.335 2017/04/19 [Logger,ERROR] [midas.c:14079:rpc_server_receive,ERROR]
> rpc check ok, abort canceled

What happens is this. For each run transition, cm_transition does RPC calls
to each client telling them to transition. So even if you run only on localhost, there is still
tcp connections being created and broken to do these RPCs. These connections are
typically created and left open, but when you stop odbedit, it's connections would
be closed/broken. Now in the midas rpc code there is confusion between the main rpc
connection for remote clients and temporary rpc connections for run transitions. This
confusion is the cause of these junk error messages - first the code thinks that the main rpc
connection is closed it it should commit suicide (abort), then it find that it was
just an rpc connection and there is no need to die.

https://bitbucket.org/tmidas/midas/issues/44/junk-messages-about-rpc-check-ok-abort

>
> - Enable non-localhost RPC -> y
> - Disable RPC hosts check  -> y
> 

this is unsafe:

if you only run on localhost, "enable non-localhost rpc" should be "n" and midas will no listen to any 
outside connections (except for mhttpd, of course).

if you have remote clients, enable non-localhost rpc and enter their hostnames to the access control list.

"disable rpc hosts check" is for the case where you do not know the hostnames of your remote clients, 
for example when they come from dynamic ip addresses on a wifi network.

In this case you tell midas to accept connections from everybody everywhere in the world
and hopefully you have a firewall somewhere to prevent the evil hackers from actually connecting.
I hope this is not your situation.

K.O.

Dear MIDAQ developers,

I wonder if there is a non-intrusive way to have an external (wrt MIDAS)*SQL database 
serving as a primary source of the run number information for a MIDAS-based DAQ system? 
- like a plugin with a getNextRunNumber() function, for example, or a special client?

Here is the use case: 

- multiple subdetectors are taking test data during early commissioning 
- a postgres db is a single sorce of run numbers.
- test runs taken by different subsystems are assigned different [unique] run numbers and 
  the data taken by the subsystem are identified not by the run number/dataset name , but 
  by the run type, different for different susbsystems.

-- many thanks, regards, Pasha

> I wonder if there is a non-intrusive way to have an external (wrt MIDAS)*SQL database 
> serving as a primary source of the run number information for a MIDAS-based DAQ system? 
> - like a plugin with a getNextRunNumber() function, for example, or a special client?

One of my experiments has special rules for run numbering as well. I created a client that registers a begin-of-run transition handler with sequence 1 (so it's the first client to handle the begin-of-run transition). That client updates "/Runinfo/Run number" in the ODB. 

This mostly works. mlogger will create .mid files based on the new run number, the ODB dumps within those files show the new run number etc.

But there are 2 quirks. Let's say your client changed the number from 11 to 400. The message log will say "Run #11 started" and "Run #400 stopped". And the history system will record the start/stop times the same way. That only matters for when you're viewing history plots on the webpage and zoom in far enough to see the run transitions (represented by green and red vertical dashed lines) - the green line will be labelled 11 and the red line 400.

Depending on the exact logic you need, you may be able to avoid these quirks by also recomputing the run number before the user even tries to start a run (e.g. after the end of the previous run, or when the user changes an important setting in the ODB). If you're changing the run number between runs, make sure to set it to "desired number - 1", as midas will increment the run number automatically before handling the next start run request.

> - multiple subdetectors are taking test data during early commissioning 
> - a postgres db is a single sorce of run numbers.
> - test runs taken by different subsystems are assigned different [unique] run numbers and 
>   the data taken by the subsystem are identified not by the run number/dataset name , but 
>   by the run type, different for different susbsystems.

For that purpose I would not "mis-use" run numbers. Run number are meant to be incremented 
sequentially, like if you have a time-stamp in seconds since 1.1.1970 (Unix time). Intead, I 
would add additional attributes under /Experiment/Run Parameters like "Subsystem type", "Run 
mode (production/commissioning)" etc. You have much more freedom in choosing any number of 
attributes there. Then, send this attributes to your postgred db via "/Logger/Runlog/SQL/Links 
BOR". Then you can query your database to give you all runs of a certain subtype or mode.

See https://daq00.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Logging_to_a_mySQL_database

Stefan

> > - multiple subdetectors are taking test data during early commissioning 
> > - a postgres db is a single sorce of run numbers.
> > - test runs taken by different subsystems are assigned different [unique] run numbers and 
> >   the data taken by the subsystem are identified not by the run number/dataset name , but 
> >   by the run type, different for different susbsystems.
> 
> For that purpose I would not "mis-use" run numbers. Run number are meant to be incremented 
> sequentially, like if you have a time-stamp in seconds since 1.1.1970 (Unix time). Intead, I 
> would add additional attributes under /Experiment/Run Parameters like "Subsystem type", "Run 
> mode (production/commissioning)" etc. You have much more freedom in choosing any number of 
> attributes there. Then, send this attributes to your postgred db via "/Logger/Runlog/SQL/Links 
> BOR". Then you can query your database to give you all runs of a certain subtype or mode.
> 
> See https://daq00.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Logging_to_a_mySQL_database
> 
> Stefan

Ben, Stefan - thanks much for your suggestions!(and apologies for the thanks being delayed) 

Stefan, I don't think we're talking 'mis-use' - rather different subdetectors being commisisoned 
at different locations, on an uncorrelated schedule, using independent run control (RC) instances. 
At this point in time, we can't use a common RC instance. 
The collected data, however, are written back into a common storage, and we need to avoid two 
subdetectors  using the same run number. As all RC instances can connect to the same database and request a 
run number from there, an external DB serving run numbers to multiple clients looks as a reasonable solution, 
which provides unique run numbers for everyone. Of course, the run number gets incremented (although on the DB 
server side), and of course different susbystems are assigned different subsystem types. 

So, in essense, it is about _where_ the run number is incremented - the RC vs the DB. 
If there were a good strategy to implement a DB-based solution that w/o violating 
first principles of Midas:), I'd be happy to contribute. It looks like a legitimate use case.

-- let me know, regards, Pasha 

> Stefan, I don't think we're talking 'mis-use' - rather different subdetectors being commisisoned 
> at different locations, on an uncorrelated schedule, using independent run control (RC) instances. 
> At this point in time, we can't use a common RC instance. 
> The collected data, however, are written back into a common storage, and we need to avoid two 
> subdetectors  using the same run number. As all RC instances can connect to the same database and request a 
> run number from there, an external DB serving run numbers to multiple clients looks as a reasonable solution, 
> which provides unique run numbers for everyone. Of course, the run number gets incremented (although on the DB 
> server side), and of course different susbystems are assigned different subsystem types. 
> 
> So, in essense, it is about _where_ the run number is incremented - the RC vs the DB. 
> If there were a good strategy to implement a DB-based solution that w/o violating 
> first principles of Midas:), I'd be happy to contribute. It looks like a legitimate use case.

Ok, maybe attitude comes from the fact that I never used such a scheme in the last 30 years with midas.

If you go in this direction, there is an alternative to what Ben wrote: Use the sequencer to start a run.
The sequencer script can obtain a new run number from a central instance (e.g. by calling a shell script 
like 'curl ...' to obtain the new run number, then put it into /Runinfo/Run number as Ben wrote. This has
the advantage that the run is _started_ already with the correct number, so the history system is fine.

The script can then wait for n events, then stop the run etc. A sequencer script will also be necessary if
you want to configure your electronics (see next answer...)

Stefan

> 
> If you go in this direction, there is an alternative to what Ben wrote: Use the sequencer to start a run.
> The sequencer script can obtain a new run number from a central instance (e.g. by calling a shell script 
> like 'curl ...' to obtain the new run number, then put it into /Runinfo/Run number as Ben wrote. This has
> the advantage that the run is _started_ already with the correct number, so the history system is fine.
> 

Hi Stefan, this sounds like a perfect solution - thanks! - and leads to another, more technical, question:

- how does one communicate with an external shell script from MSL ? I looked at the MIDAS Sequencer page 
  
  https://daq00.triumf.ca/MidasWiki/index.php/Sequencer

  and didn't find an immediately obvious candidate among the MSL commands. 
  The closest seems to be 

  'SCRIPT script [, a, b, c, ...]' 

  but I couldn't easily figure how to propagate the output of the script back to MIDAS. 
  Let say, the script creates an ASCII file with the next run number. What is the easiest 
  way to import the run number into ODB? - Should an external script spawn a [short-lived] 
  MIDAS client ?  - That would work, but I'm almost sure there is a more straightforward solution. 

  Of course, the assumption that the 'SCRIPT' command provides the solution could be wrong.

-- thanks again, regards, Pasha

> - how does one communicate with an external shell script from MSL ? 

trying to answer my own question, as I didn't find a clear answer in the forum archive :

1. one could have a MSL script with a 'SCRIPT ./myscript.sh' command in it - 
   that would run a shell script named 'myscript.sh'
   [that was not obvious from the documentation on MIDAS wiki, and adding a couple of clarifying 
    sentences there would go long ways]

2. if a script produces an ascii file with a known name, for example, 'a.odb', with the following two lines:

--------------------------------------- a.odb
[/Runinfo]
Run number  = INT32 : 105
--------------------------------------- end a.odb

one can use the 'odbload' MSL command :

odbload a.odb

and get the run number set to 105. It works, but I'm curious if that is the right (envisaged) 
way of interacting with the shell scripts, or one could do better than that.

-- thanks, regards, Pasha